This is highly probative evidence for an obstruction of justice investigation.
|
|
"Any probative value of the evidence is outweighed by unfair prejudice," they said.
|
|
"We're here to talk about people with pertinent and probative evidence," Schiff said.
|
|
In Kagan's case, her solicitor general records likely would have held limited probative value.
|
|
It cannot, in his view, meet anything like the heavy probative burden required of credible research.
|
|
However, instead of sound negative, simply ask probative questions to understand what your colleague is saying.
|
|
It has neither proved, nor provided any probative evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians.
|
|
The latter attack constitutes highly-probative evidence for a potential case against him of obstruction of justice.
|
|
" But, as Bandes and Jessica Salerno, a psychologist at Arizona State, have argued, it's hard to say what lies between probative value and prejudicial force: "If the probative purpose of the evidence is to evoke the life lost with vividness and particularity, what is the measure of undue prejudice?
|
|
" Dauber says the intention of the photo in the gang rape case was "far more prejudicial than probative.
|
|
First, develop meaningful probative questions designed to discover, isolate and focus upon pertinent circumstances, facts and forensic evidence.
|
|
Crotty rejected that motion on Wednesday, calling the recordings "probative of the defendants' motive to carry out the scheme."
|
|
Additional untested evidence, like Mickey's sexual assault kit, "could have potential probative value," the commission noted in its report.
|
|
"The police did not make any inquiry to determine whether a swab would be probative," Justice Rosalie Abella wrote.
|
|
The point is that the probative value of a Trump statement about Iran is, to be generous, roughly zero.
|
|
"Under those circumstances, videos and photographs would be no more evidential, no more probative, than a drawing," Fallis says.
|
|
However, in such circumstances, flight is not necessarily probative of a suspect's state of mind or consciousness of guilt.
|
|
The mere fact that he thinks that's probative on the issue of racism demonstrates that he just doesn't get it.
|
|
Dempsey said these witnesses had clear probative value, which means they were useful evidence to prove something important in the trial.
|
|
Further, the questions asked of Stone go to the core of the collusion issue, and are therefore highly relevant and probative.
|
|
Some experts say the tactic is unduly suggestive, ineffectively tests a witness's memory, and provides more theatrical flourish than probative evidence.
|
|
"That is the most probative information of how he ruled in abortion cases and may rule in the future," Ruskay-Kidd said.
|
|
Judge O'Neill said in his ruling that he had carefully weighed the probative value versus the risk of unfair prejudice in his decision.
|
|
The questions asked, taken in context, reflect an investigation into matters which are probative of the issues to be tried in this case.
|
|
They can't show it "because the prejudicial effect of the videotape, which includes a number of extraneous matters, outweighs its probative value," she wrote.
|
|
The court said before letting the evidence in the judge had to weigh the evidence's "probative value" versus the "prejudicial" effect on the jury.
|
|
Judges are finding these types of witnesses to be more probative to the prosecution's case than prejudicial to the defense in the wake of #MeToo.
|
|
"I would rather risk interviewing a witness in good faith who ultimately produces little probative information than risk not interviewing one who does," he wrote.
|
|
In October 2001, a Commerce Department investigation found "no probative evidence" that imports of iron ore and semi-finished steel threaten to impair U.S. national security.
|
|
Cosby was consistent with the rules and orders of the court and permitted us to obtain information probative of the liability and damages issues in the case.
|
|
In Mr. Lewis's case, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania upheld his conviction, affirming the trial court's decision that the slow-motion video was more probative than prejudicial.
|
|
Mr. Cohen's claims about coded signals from President Trump indicating that he should lie to Congress fall short of the probative value of a stained blue dress.
|
|
"The families of those killed and injured in Benghazi and the American people deserve to hear from any witness who can potentially provide relevant, probative evidence," Gowdy said.
|
|
"I now wish that I had been more probative in my approach in delving deeper into the explanations I was receiving about what was being done," he said.
|
|
Legally, the president's attempt to dictate his son's response may be probative (meaning it constitutes evidence) as to motive in an obstruction of justice case developed by Mueller.
|
|
"These records are highly probative and can help the state," Anne Arundel County State's Attorney Anne Leitess said, adding that Ramos's mental health is "highly relevant," according to NBC.
|
|
This is often how criminal investigations work: Gather all the material possible, then winnow it down to the most relevant and probative information upon which to assess potential charges.
|
|
It is probative evidence of obstruction that Trump has launched aggressive, sustained and unprecedented attacks against the Justice Department and FBI in an attempt to impede their investigation and discredit their leaders.
|
|
Asked about his release, Christophe Rouget, a spokesman for one of the main police unions, said, "We live in a state of laws, after all," citing the lack of probative evidence against him.
|
|
In this flavor of copyright infringement lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove either that the new work shows "probative similarity" to the original, and also that the infringer had access to the infringed work.
|
|
It's hard to predict how much weight Judge Brinkema's decision will have because it's hard to imagine a repeat scenario in which prosecutors have mistakenly disclosed strong but not probative evidence of a secret criminal case.
|
|
But relevant evidence can be excluded if its probative value, meaning its relevance to make a fact at issue in the case more or less likely true, is outweighed by its unfair prejudice to the defendant.
|
|
Despite what many talking heads or columnists are saying, we — and they — really don't know the answer, because we're all simply not sure if the right (or at least most probative) questions were asked of Mueller.
|
|
Lynne M. Abraham, a former Philadelphia district attorney and judge, said that in deciding whether to permit the testimony the judge would have to determine whether the testimony's probative value would outweigh any prejudice against the defendant.
|
|
And he aggressively tries to hide crucial information, including his tax returns and full details about any business ties to Russia, that could clear him and others of wrongdoing or provide probative evidence of wrongdoing if it occurred.
|
|
If Trump knew that Flynn lied to the FBI, then pressured former FBI Director James Comey to not prosecute Flynn, then fired Comey after he did not comply, this is powerful and probative evidence of obstruction of justice.
|
|
This pattern of behavior would almost certainly be viewed by special counsel Robert Mueller as probative evidence that there was known coordination and collusion between Trump associates and Russians seeking to decide the outcome of the American election.
|
|
Indeed, the only probative evidence on this point was a declaration by prominent former national security officials, submitted by the State of Washington (which had challenged the ban), explaining how the order would make the country less safe.
|
|
It would seem that the power the law bestows upon and channels through them, for all its apparent ubiquity in the alterative reality Young conjures, is nevertheless uneasy, fugitive, still subject to the probative gaze of the camera/viewer.
|
|
Repeated misrepresentations by various Trump associates regarding their meetings with Russians suggests what lawyers call "consciousness of guilt" that is probative evidence of potential crimes that would affect the decision of a special counsel about whether to bring charges.
|
|
KING: With regard to your memos, isn't it true that in a — in a court case, when you're weighing evidence, contemporaneous memos and contemporaneous statements to third parties are considered probative in terms of the — the — the validity of — of testimony?
|
|
"The government will not be permitted to introduce the clip itself in its case in chief because the prejudicial effect of the videotape, which includes a number of extraneous matters, outweighs its probative value," Jackson, an Obama appointee, ruled Monday.
|
|
In a brief decision on Friday, Montgomery County Judge Steven O'Neill ruled that "following a careful balancing of the probative value of the other acts evidence and the prejudice to the Defendant," only alleged "victim 6" would be permitted to testify at trial.
|
|
"The government will not be permitted to introduce the clip itself in its case in chief because the prejudicial effect of the videotape, which includes a number of extraneous matters, outweighs its probative value," wrote Jackson, an appointee of President Barack Obama.
|
|
Dr Deméré's arguments that the fragmentation patterns of the mastodon's bones and the ways those bones are gathered around the putative anvils both indicate deliberation, and that the flakes from the cobbles were caused by hammerstones hitting those anvils, are persuasive, but not probative.
|
|
" House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, said it was clear Republicans were "still reeling from the revelation of John Bolton's book and what he has to say, the very relevant and probative quality of the testimony that he should give the Senate.
|
|
He agreed with MacCallum when she characterized the publicly stated origin of the probe — the Papadopoulos tip — as "really a very thin thread to go on," arguing Papadopoulos' boast "had very little probative value" based on "rampant speculation" to that effect in political and media circles.
|
|
"This would be of probative value if the State intends to prove that Ms. Black's hours-long delay in reporting the boys' disappearance to Perry Cohen's parents and her failure to report the overdue vessel to the authorities in a timely manner may have diminished the likelihood of the boys being rescued safely," the report reads.
|
|
"Without any newly discovered evidence that is reliable, credible and probative of innocence, the district court properly found that 'MacDonald has failed to establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that no reasonable factfinder would have found him guilty of the murder of his wife and two daughters,' " assistant U.S. attorneys Leslie Cooley and Jennifer May-Parker wrote.
|
|
He then hired a racist Attorney General denounced for attempting to suppress elderly black voters by none other than Coretta Scott King, a senior policy advisor whose senior yearbook quote included the phrase "There is room here for only 100 percent Americanism, only for those who are American and nothing else," and Steve fucking Bannon (probative link unnecessary).
|
|
Even in the face of the president's willful obstruction, the powerful, probative, and compelling evidence produced demonstrates that the president violated his oath of office, disregarded the nation's security, endeavored to corrupt the 220006 presidential election, and then launched a cover-up to prevent Congress from learning the full extent of his transgressions and acting to prevent their recurrence.
|
|
They point out that potentially available witnesses, such as former national security adviser John Bolton and acting White House chief of staff Mick MulvaneyJohn (Mick) Michael MulvaneyWhat to watch for on Day 3 of Senate impeachment trial Biden says he would not engage in witness swap in impeachment trial Schumer blasts GOP votes over witnesses, documents at trial MORE, have probative testimony on these contested matters.
|
|
Trump's new travel ban blocked: What you need to know "The substantive revisions reflected in EO-2 have reduced the probative value of the President's statements to the point that it is no longer likely that plaintiffs can succeed on their claim that the predominate purpose of EO-2 is to discriminate against Muslims based on their religion and that EO-2 is a pretext or a sham for that purpose," Trenga added.
|
|
In a popular 1970s song, the splendid Carly Simon introduced the attendance of a former suitor (reportedly the actor Warren Beatty) at a solar eclipse as probative evidence of his putatively insufferable vanity: Well I hear you went to SaratogaAnd your horse, naturally, wonThen you flew your Learjet up to Nova ScotiaTo see the total eclipse of the sunWell, you're where you should be all the timeAnd when you're not, you're with some underworld spy Or the wife of a close friend,Wife of a close friend, andYou're so vainYou probably think this song is about you On a higher plane, Wordsworth wrote about an eclipse in 1820: High on her speculative tower Stood Science waiting for the hour When Sol was destined to endure That darkening of his radiant face The solar eclipse is no longer mysterious, supernatural, foreboding, or ominous (or even "total"; owing to the solar corona, the darkness of a "total" eclipse is only partial).
|
|
126) to exclude unreliable evidence (i.e. the prejudicial value outweighs the probative value).
|
|
Expert Evidence, 5, 2–28. and, specifically, the probative value of psychologists' testimony on eyewitness issues in the cases of exonerations by DNA evidence.Konečni, V. J., Ebbesen, E. B., & Nehrer, E. (2000). Retrospective implications for the probative value of psychologists' testimony on eyewitness issues of exonerations by DNA evidence.
|
|
Law and Human Behavior, 10, 117–126. They also published extensive critiques of what they believed were mistaken, yet entrenched, views on another major issue in legal psychology, namely, the probative value of prior eyewitness memory research in general,Ebbesen, E. B., & Konečni, V. J. (1997). Eyewitness memory research: Probative v. prejudicial value.
|
|
If the witness is defendant, the burden is on the prosecution to show that the probative value of the impeachment (demonstrating the defendant witness's propensity to lie) outweighs the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant.FRE 609(a)(1)(B), Cornell University Law School, Legal Information Institute The probative value must merely outweigh unfair prejudice. If the witness is a person other than the defendant, the evidence of the prior felony conviction for a crime not involving dishonesty or false statement is admissible unless the party objecting to the evidence succeeds in the more difficult task of proving that the probative value of the felony conviction is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant. The probative value must substantially outweigh unfair prejudice.
|
|
However, other countries had no specific probative measure in the field of infringement, which was a serious obstacle to the enforcement of intellectual property rights. The saisie- contrefaçon is a probative measure now intended to exist in all the member states of the European Union as a result of Directive No. 2004/48/EC.
|
|
Peake, 22 Vet. App. 295, 297 (2008). The examiner opined on both occasions that the claimant's major depressive disorder was not caused by Guillain–Barré Syndrome. The Board placed more probative value on the VA examiner's opinion, reasoning that the private doctors did not conduct an in-depth review of the claims folder, thereby reducing the probative weight of their opinions.
|
|
Dirkschneider, 543 F. Supp. 466, 482 n.10, 214 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 417 (D. Neb. 1981). Some courts also use "probative similarity" to describe this standard.
|
|
Two possibilities arose for doing so. First, "an item of evidence might be viewed as an island," such that its probative value and danger for unfair prejudice would be assessed in a vacuum. Second, the item of evidence in question could be measured in relation to "the full evidentiary context of the case as the court understands it when the ruling must be made." Under the first approach, the party offering the evidence would have an incentive to organize its case around the most unfairly prejudicial evidence it can find that is highly probative, and leave out equally probative evidence that is less prejudicial.
|
|
The law of evidence. IRWIN Law Inc., Third Edition, 2002, p.30 The sole discretion to exclude evidence is based on the weighing of prejudicial value and probative value.
|
|
Probative evidence "seeks the truth". Generally in law, evidence that is not probative (doesn't tend to prove the proposition for which it is proffered) is inadmissible and the rules of evidence permit it to be excluded from a proceeding or stricken from the record "if objected to by opposing counsel". A balancing test may come into the picture if the value of the evidence needs to be weighed versus its prejudicial nature.
|
|
But neither s 55 nor s 56 of the Act requires that evidence be probative to a particular degree for it to be admissible. Evidence that is of only some, even slight, probative value will be admissible, just as it is at common law.IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14. Therefore, evidence is either relevant or it is not and if the evidence is not relevant then no further question arises about its admissibility.
|
|
The remarkable effectiveness of the saisie-contrefaçon led to its progressive extension – recently through French Act No. 2007-1544 of 29 October 2007 – to all intellectual property rights, its criminal and protective nature correspondingly tending to diminish in favour of a probative nature. Today, the saisie-contrefaçon has an exclusively probative nature, except in the field of copyright and related rights where, for the historical reasons set out above, it has also retained its protective nature.
|
|
It said: "Our review leads us to conclude that information regarding the purposes for which the United States previously paid Noriega potentially had some probative value;... Thus, the district court may have overstated the case when it declared evidence of the purposes for which the United States allegedly paid Noriega wholly irrelevant to his defense". The Court of Appeals refused to set aside the verdict because it felt that "the potential probative value of this material, however, was relatively marginal".
|
|
Critics have suggested that even a successful demonstration would lack probative impact beyond the realm of diminutive sheets of folded paper—they can only fall. Supporters countered that the broadening of knowledge was justification enough.
|
|
When referring to evidence presented at a trial, the balancing test allows the court to exclude relevant evidence if its "probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." In other words, if a particular piece of evidence is substantially more prejudicial than it is probative, it may not be allowed in as evidence.Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 403.
|
|
Only by attaching copies of the judicial proceedings wherein one party petitions the second party to either contest or accept the act in open court could the instrument be made probative, i.e., imbued with fides publica, "public faith and credit". In later years, it became possible to register and deposit the acts of a tabellio in public archives to make them probative. Both exceptores and tabelliones were organized into civil guilds (collegia, scholae) to ensure the official recording of both public and private acts.
|
|
The rules on admissibility of evidence are meant to be the only standards for admitting evidence. All relevant evidence is admissible, and all evidence against a defendant is prejudicial against the defendant, but the evidence is inadmissible if the danger of unfair prejudice substantially outweighs its probative value. The other rules, including the rule about similar acts evidence, are intended to limit the purpose for which otherwise probative evidence may be admitted. The text of these rules does not require any other preliminary showing before admitting the evidence.
|
|
Reliability considers the probative force of the evidence (the legal relevance), rather than the evidence's ability to affect the probability of the existence of a fact in issue (the logical relevance).IMM v R [2016] HCA at [43], [49].
|
|
Both Koenigs denied these allegations. In separate statements the brothers mentioned Paul's membership in Tammany Hall as probative of their claims that Paul was a member of the Democratic Party, and, as such, unlikely to have associated with them.
|
|
Where the material evidence is being considered for exclusion: Judges may face the need to weigh the probative value versus the prejudicial impact in nearly any case. A part of this is symbolized by a weighing scale and represents justice.
|
|
They concluded that the probative value of the confession, which was supported by discovery of new evidence, outweighed any prejudicial effect. The Court also found no abuse of process in the conduct of the undercover officers involved in the investigation.
|
|
"The Probative Value of Belated Testimony." In addition, he formulates decision-making strategies for determining findings of fact, e.g. "Judicial Discretion in Fact-Finding, Freedom of Proof, and Professionalism of the Courts." He addresses the theoretical and practical difficulties in identifying suspects, e.g.
|
|
C. Cir. 2001) ("knowledge of intent may help the court to interpret facts and predict consequences"). The Government argued that the specific evidence in the record of how Dentsply "intended for its exclusive dealing to harm competition" was highly probative,Id. and Stucke shares that view.
|
|
O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2005] UKHL 26 was an English evidence law decision of the House of Lords which held that evidence of previous bad behaviour, known as similar fact evidence, may be admitted in civil case proceedings if it is probative of a relevant matter.
|
|
Atangana negotiated a cut of 5% for the collectors, much to their delight. Atangana (foreground, right side) during the German colonial period Hans Dominik became the Jaunde post commander in 1904. For the next six years, Atangana accompanied him on at least fifteen administrative patrols and probative excursions.Quinn, "Atangana", 488.
|
|
It was later proven that this damage happened before David even moved into the house. In 1991 David's conviction was overturned when the Illinois Appellate Court reversed the conviction outright, holding that the evidence against him had been no more probative than that against his wife. The murder of Jaclyn remains unsolved.
|
|
In 1970, the Supreme Court of Canada was concerned with exclusionary discretion within the judicial system. In R. v. Wray, the term "probative value" is used to explain that "judges in criminal cases do not have a discretion to exclude evidence because of how it was obtained."Paciocco, David M. & Stuesser, Lee.
|
|
Section 3(4) of the Law of Evidence Amendment ActAct 45 of 1988. defines hearsay evidence as “evidence, whether oral or in writing, the probative value of which depends upon the credibility of any person other than the person giving such evidence.” When the probative value of an informal admission depends primarily on its maker (which will almost invariably be the case), it will be a hearsay statement. As, however, section 3 of the Law of Evidence Amendment ActAct 45 of 1988. is “subject to the provisions of any other law,”s 3(1). existing statutory provisions will remain the primary route to admission, and the common law will remain “any other factor” to be taken into account by the court in the exercise of its discretion to admit hearsay in the interests of justice.s 3(1)(c)(vii). While Paizes also takes the view that section 3(4) brings confessions and admissions within the hearsay rule, and that the probative value of a statement depends on the credibility of its maker,Paizes in Du Toit et al Commentary 24-50J.See Paizes 1985 SALJ 258.See S v Holshauzen 1984 (4) SA 852 (A).
|
|
In a dissent joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist, Justice O'Connor, and Justice Thomas, Justice Breyer characterized the case as one about relevance and not hearsay. Breyer argued that the timing of the alleged motive to fabricate should go to the probative force of the testimony, not its reliability. Breyer thought that a post-motive consistent statement could be admitted to rebut a charge of fabrication, but that the probative force of the statement would simply be diminished. Breyer argued that FRE 801(d)(1)(B) could simply be a recognition that juries can have difficulty in separating the impeaching and substantive uses of hearsay statements, and so the rule declared as not hearsay prior consistent statements used to rebut charges of fabrication.
|
|
A document attested by the notary has indisputable probative force. Notary is responsible for the damage caused by its official activity. Along with legislation, insuring of notary's professional responsibility, operating since 2010, also provides a guarantee of citizen's immunity. Damage caused by culpable or careless acts of notaries is remunerated by the insurance company.
|
|
Since evidence that is relevant has the capability to affect the assessment of the probability of the existence of a fact in issue, it is "probative".Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 at [81]. This determination is known as logical relevance. Logical relevance merely requires evidence have a logical connection to the facts in issue.
|
|
Lamer and Wilson held that the polygraph evidence was admissible. The results went directly to a key issue of the case: who is to be believed, the informer or the defendants? The probative value of the evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect and so it would be unfair to deny the defendants access to a full defence.
|
|
This factor favored PEI somewhat. A defendant's intent to confuse constitutes probative evidence of likely confusion: Courts normally assume that the defendant's intentions were carried out successfully. In this case, the evidence did not definitively establish defendants' intent. At a minimum, however, it did suggest that defendants did nothing to prevent click-throughs that resulted from the confusion.
|
|
Of all the cases taken on by the Innocence Project, about 43% of clients were proven innocent, 42% were confirmed guilty, and evidence was inconclusive and not probative in 15% of cases. In about 40% of all DNA exoneration cases, law enforcement officials identified the actual perpetrator based on the same DNA test results that led to an exoneration.
|
|
Blackmun concurred, stating simply that he believed this case had cut back somewhat on the standards articulated in Zemel v. Rusk and Kent v. Dulles sub silencio and that it would have been better if the Court had forthrightly construed the law such that evidence of a longstanding Executive policy or construction in this area be probative of the issue of congressional authorization.
|
|
Morden J.A. interpreted the trial judge to mean that some similarities between the two programs could have resulted from Duncombe's style and experience, but that does not mean these were accepted as a justification for copying. Though the similarities may be attributable to the fact that Duncombe authored both programs, this is not probative of the copying issue.Delrina II at para 18.
|
|
The statement of these general principles > is easy, but it is obvious that it may often be very difficult to draw the > line and to decide whether a particular piece of evidence is on the one side > or the other. Evidence of similar facts can only be admitted if it is both relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
|
|
For example, in Oregon v. Romero (2003), the Oregon Court of Appeals held that the testimony of a defense expert about the results of a Gudjonsson suggestibility test—offered in support of the defendant's claim that her confession to police was involuntary—met "the threshold for admissibility" because "It would have been probative, relevant, and helpful to the trier of fact."Oregon v. Romero, 191 Or.App.
|
|
Justice William Young, giving the minority opinion held that the evidence of the 'van incident' was admissible on all charges.Mahomed v R [2011] NZSC 52 at [78]. McGrath and William Young JJ also held that for propensity evidence “if probative value and the risk of unfair prejudice were equal, exclusion would only be required by s 43”.Mahomed v R [2011] NZSC 52 at [66].
|
|
The SCPA permits competitive emulation of a chip by means of reverse engineering. The ordinary test for illegal copying (mask work infringement) is the "substantial similarity" test of copyright law,Brooktree, ¶¶ 31-33. but when the defense of reverse engineering is involved and supported by probative evidence (usually, the so-called paper trail of design and development work), the similarity must be greater.Brooktree, ¶¶ 48-66.
|
|
Accessed October 22, 2009. Some factors for determining the credibility of testimony in U.S. courts include: (1) the witness had personal knowledge, (2) he or she was actually present at the scene, (3) the witness paid attention at the scene, and (4) he or she told the whole truth. The probative value of a credible witness is not a required element in any criminal case.United States v.
|
|
If necessary, a Dutch notary will instruct and call on the services of other legal practitioners. However, under no circumstances may a notary represent clients in court. Apart from advising, a notary also draws, executes, and retains instruments either by statute or at the parties' request. Under Dutch law, a notarially executed instrument is probative as of the data certa (vaste datum) and subscription of the parties.
|
|
Courts have recognized the reliability and probative worth of written medical reports even in formal trials and, while acknowledging their hearsay character, have admitted them as an exception to the hearsay rule. Notable is Judge Parker's well-known ruling in the Warrisk Insurance case of Long v. United States 59 F.2d 602, 603-604 (CA4 1932) which deserves quotation here, but which, because of its length, we do not reproduce.
|
|
While defendants are entitled to assert the right against compelled self-incrimination in a civil court case, there are consequences to the assertion of the right in such an action. The Supreme Court has held that "the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano,425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976).
|
|
Taitz asked Malihi to fine Obama in contempt for failing to appear. On February 3, Malihi recommended that Obama remain on the ballot. Concerning Taitz's case Malihi wrote: "The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations". The Drudge Retort described the hearing as "Empty Table 1, Orly Taitz 0".
|
|
The majority judgment given by Justice Tipping began by noting that "The greater the linkage or coincidence provided by the propensity evidence, the greater the probative value that evidence is likely to have."Mahomed v R [2011] NZSC 52 at [3]. The judgment also stated that not "a great deal" could be gained from the pre-Evidence Act case law on propensity evidence.Mahomed v R [2011] NZSC 52 at [5].
|
|
Often, authentication and digital signing are applied in conjunction. In advanced electronic signatures, the signatory has authenticated and uniquely linked to a signature. In the case of a qualified electronic signature as defined in the eIDAS-regulation, the signer's identity is even certified by a qualified trust service provider. This linking of signature and authentication firstly supports the probative value of the signature – commonly referred to as non-repudiation of origin.
|
|
Oxford University Press, (1999) p. 261 Sometimes the silence of multiple sources may have a probative value that sheds light on the historical circumstance, for instance Jacob Neusner states that an argument from silence regarding the absence of an Exilarch sheds light on the relationship between Jews and the Parthian administration in Babylonia.A History of the Jews in Babylonia: Vol. 1, The Parthian Period by Jacob Neusner (1984) pp.
|
|
Writer/Director Joseph Nobile alleged that Margot Louise Watts, a/k/a M. L. Stedman, knowingly and willfully copied, plagiarized, pirated and misappropriated expressive content from his screenplay entitled The Rootcutter, subsequently re-titled A Tale of Two Humans, originally copyrighted in 2001. On January 26, 2017, Nobile filed suit against Watt's publishers, Simon & Schuster, Dreamworks et al. In spite of defendant's admission of having access and probative copying of plaintiff's screenplay, Judge Katherine Forrest of the US District Court in New York ruled against Nobile on October 16, 2017 and subsequently granted the defendants' motions for Attorney Fees "due to the objective unreasonableness of plaintiff’s claims, and to dissuade other would-be plaintiffs from filing similarly baseless suits...". Nobile appealed (oral argument link regarding access and probative copying by Watts starting at 15:00 min mark), and on September 21, 2018, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the original decisions.
|
|
R v Smith [2001] WASCA 102. However, logical relevance isn't sufficient to establish the potential admissibility of the evidence and is still possible for the evidence to be inadmissible. This determination is known as "legal relevance" as opposed to logical relevance and sets a demanding test for discretionary exclusion (but one that is not obligatory) where its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger that the evidence might be unfairly prejudicial.Evidence Act 1995, s135.
|
|
It was error for a partner's statement that the payment was a gift to be regarded as of only slight probative value because a declaration about intention by a person with knowledge was not excludable simply because it was made after the fact. The court was left with the definite and firm conviction that the tax court committed a mistake in finding that the payments were compensation rather than an excludable gift.
|
|
Since there was no evidence for each supplier that the supplier in fact had knowledge of the existence of such conspiracy, such a supplier could not be considered a spoke. "We, therefore, hold that on this record Elder-Beerman failed to offer sufficient probative evidence to establish the alleged single conspiracy upon which it bases its claim for damages." 459 F.2d at 147. One judge dissented as to the conspiracy issue.
|
|
Taitz asked Malihi to find Obama in contempt for failing to appear. On February 3, 2012, Malihi recommended that Obama remain on the ballot. Concerning Taitz's case Malihi wrote: "The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations". The Drudge Retort described the hearing as, "Empty Table 1, Orly Taitz 0".
|
|
An act is an instrument that records a fact or something that has been said, done, or agreed. Acts generally take the form of legal instruments of writing that have probative value and executory force. They are usually accepted as self-authenticating demonstrative evidence in court proceedings, though with the precarious status of notaries public and their acts under common law, this is not always so. Common types of acts are legislative, judicial, and notarial acts.
|
|
"The search was, at best, a general and unbounded pursuit of anything that might tend to indicate any sort of malfeasance—a search that is almost by definition, unreasonable." It had also been properly excluded since its prejudicial value outweighed its probative value. "It is now seventeen years since the search of Dr. Ortega's office occurred and his most personal letters and possessions were examined and seized. It is time to bring this matter to a conclusion", wrote Reinhardt.
|
|
In upholding a police search and seizure, he argued that every single police action should not be "placed under a scanning electron- microscope". In 2014, writing for the majority in R v Hart, Moldaver redefined the common law test for the admissibility of confessions obtained through a Mr. Big sting operation.R v Hart, 2014 SCC 52. He held that the confessions will only be admissible if they contain probative value and do not cause an abuse of process.
|
|
The almost total destruction of the oppidum occurred at the end of the third century BC and may be linked with the Second Punic War who opposed Rome and Carthage. This war resulted in the control by Rome of eastern Iberian peninsula and western Languedoc. The catapult bullets found in the levels of destruction of the oppidum would be probative evidence. The excavations have also revealed traces of funerary rituals and animal sacrifices mixing cremation of human remains.
|
|
The Court added that Congress chose to make the Patent Office, not the courts, "primarily responsible for protecting the public from the evil consequences that might result if practitioners should betray their high trust." 338 U.S. at 319-20. The Court concluded that it was "satisfied that the findings were amply supported whether the measure be 'substantial evidence' or 'substantial probative evidence' " and the charge of unfairness in the hearings was "wholly without support."338 U.S. at 320.
|
|
ZertES is similar to eIDAS in assuring the legal bindingness of electronic signatures and a tiered approach to legal value in court with qualified electronic signatures having a higher probative value than advanced electronic signatures. Cross-border communications between Switzerland and the Member state of the European Union occur on a daily basis, as the country is home to many internationally active banks and companies. Therefore, ZertES and eiDAS are comparable in technical design and carry similar legal implications.
|
|
Due to the nature of the complaint, the court case against the seven defendants was referred to the jury. The Brazilian constitution establishes that it is up to this court to adjudicate cases involving intentional crimes against life. However, in order to reach the trial stage, the law states that the complaint must be approved in the so-called "investigation stage", where the target of the trial is not the accused party, but the probative structure of the prosecution.
|
|
The contested facts need to be proven by evidence, while facts admitted by the opponent do not require evidence. The judge can only rule based on the evidence presented and cannot use his or her personal knowledge to rule on the case. The court has very wide discretion in assessing relevance and materiality of evidence, and virtually any type of evidence can be admitted to the court. Typically, documentary evidence tends to have higher probative value than oral testimony.
|
|
In court, a qualified electronic signature provided the highest level of probative value, which makes it difficult to refute its authorship. A qualified electronic signature, along with its qualified certificate is given the same consideration as a handwritten signature when used as evidence in legal proceedings. The validity of a qualified electronic signature that has been created with a qualified certificate must be accepted by other EU member states regardless of which member state the signature was produced in.
|
|
The Second Circuit has made a like ruling in White v. Zutell 263 F.2d 613, 615 (1959) and in so doing, relied on the Business Records Act,28 U.S.C. 1732 8\. Past treatment by reviewing courts of written medical reports in social security disability cases is revealing. Until the decision in this case, the courts of appeals, including the Fifth Circuit, with only an occasional criticism of the medical report practice, uniformly recognized reliability and probative value in such reports.
|
|
Congress did not intend to superimpose another level of judicial oversight onto the admissibility rules; rather, it intended to ensure that no artificial barriers stood in the way of admitting probative evidence. The rules require the trial court to make threshold determinations on admissibility, including whether evidence is relevant, and whether it is not unfairly prejudicial. The Court's power to make these determinations is sufficient to guard against the danger of unfair prejudice that might result from admitting similar acts evidence.
|
|
United States.In explaining his reasoning, Justice Rutledge writes, “I had thought that issue settled by this Court's invalidation on dual grounds, in Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, of a federal statute which in effect required the production of evidence thought probative by Government counsel – the Court there holding the statute to be 'obnoxious to the prohibition of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, as well as of the Fifth.' Id., at page 632, 6 S.Ct. at page 533.
|
|
The 1980 statement by the then Malaysian Prime Minister Tun Hussein Onn concerning the "unclear" position of the island had also been premised on these documents which former Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew had claimed were in Singapore's possession. The statement was therefore merely a friendly and respectful statement of a visiting prime minister at a press conference which had no probative value in court. All Hussein Onn had meant was that the matter required further discussion between the two countries..
|
|
However, that means the written document is allowed into evidence in the case and that evidence of its contents have to be further weighed by the trier of fact. The interesting dilemma is that both advocates and opponents must cite the Gospels in order to admit or omit their contents. Thus the probative value, and the logical and conditional relevancy of the Gospel materials is exhibited. Packham liberally cites the Gospel material and biblical higher critics in order to make his points.
|
|
While an advanced electronic signature is legally binding under eIDAS, a qualified electronic signature which has been created by a qualified trust service provider carries a higher probative value when used as evidence in court. Because the signature’s authorship is considered non-repudiable, the authenticity of the signature cannot be easily challenged. EU member states are obligated to accept qualified electronic signatures that have been created with qualified certificate from other Member states as valid. According to the eIDAS Regulation, i.e.
|
|
An item of evidence is said to be material if it has some logical connection to a fact of consequence to the outcome of a case. Materiality, along with probative value, is one of two characteristics that make a given item of evidence relevant.See Rule 401 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. This largely depends on the elements of the cause of action the plaintiff seeks to prove, or that the prosecutor must prove in a criminal case to secure a conviction.
|
|
The Padmakara Translation Group (2005: p. 157) rendered Mipham's advice that Buddhist logic is required to engage the text: > In general, it is important to be familiar with the teachings on probative > signs and reasoning and, within that context, the notions of other- > elimination, the three conditions of the correct sign, and all the methods > of proof or refutation. According to the doctrine of apoha (gshan-sel-wa in Tibetan), an entity is defined as the negation of its opposite; a cow is not a non-cow.
|
|
However it will reach a higher probative value when enhanced to the level of a qualified electronic signature. By requiring the use of a qualified electronic signature creation deviceeIDAS regulation Article 3 (12) and being based on a certificate that has been issued by a qualified trust service provider, the upgraded advanced signature then carries according to Article 25 (2) of the eIDAS Regulation the same legal value as a handwritten signature. However, this is only regulated in the European Union and similarly through ZertES in Switzerland.
|
|
Evidence that is not relevant is inadmissible. Evidence is relevant if it has a tendency to prove or disprove anything that is of consequence to the determination of the proceeding. Section 8 sets out a general rule that in any proceeding the Judge must exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by the risk that the evidence will have an unfairly prejudicial effect on the outcome of the proceeding, or needlessly prolong the proceeding. Section 9 deals with the admission of evidence by consent.
|
|
One of the fundamental rights afforded to parties in contested cases is the right to cross examine evidence presented against that party. Section 5 USC 556(d) contains the fundamental right to cross examine evidence used in adjudicative hearings on the record. The statute begins by articulating the substantial evidence test, which actually requires that decisions be made on “reliable, probative and substantial evidence”, as follows: > .....Any oral or documentary evidence may be received, but the agency as a > matter of policy shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, > or unduly repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or > order issued except on consideration of the whole record or those parts > thereof cited by a party and supported by and in accordance with the > reliable, probative, and substantial evidence.... The APA then continues by making it clear that reliability depends upon cross examination: > A party is entitled to present his case or defense by oral or documentary > evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination > as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
|
|
Law enforcement agencies have confiscated colors and other club paraphernalia of these types of clubs when they raid a clubhouse or the home of a MC member, and they often display these items at press conferences. These items are then used at trial to support prosecution assertions that MC members perform criminal acts on behalf of their club. Courts have found that the probative value of such items is far outweighed by their unfairly prejudicial effects on the defence.The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Case Nos.
|
|
In 1881, C. F. Ashmead Windle, an American, claimed she had found carefully worked-out jingles in each play that identified Bacon as the author.. This sparked a cipher craze, and probative cryptograms were identified in the works by Ignatius Donnelly,. Orville Ward Owen, Elizabeth Wells Gallup,. and Dr. Isaac Hull Platt. Platt argued that the Latin word honorificabilitudinitatibus, found in Love's Labour's Lost, can be read as an anagram, yielding Hi ludi F. Baconis nati tuiti orbi ("These plays, the offspring of F. Bacon, are preserved for the world.")..
|
|
Corby's lawyers argued that she had no knowledge of the cannabis until customs officials at the airport found it. Her defence centred on the theory that she had become an unwitting drug courier for what was supposed to have been an interstate shipment of drugs between Brisbane and Sydney in Australia. Her legal defence suggested that airport baggage handlers had put the drugs in Corby's bag, but they could not provide substantive probative evidence of this. According to her lawyers, the cannabis was meant to have been removed in Sydney.
|
|
In addition to remains, archaeologists are trained to look for objects contained in and around the excavation area. These objects can include anything from wedding rings to potentially probative evidence such as cigarette butts or shoe prints. Their training extends further to observing context, association and significance of objects in a crime scene and drawing conclusions that may be useful for locating a victim or suspect. A forensic archaeologist must also be able to utilize a degree of creativity and adaptability during times when crime scenes can not be excavated using traditional archaeological techniques.
|
|
Eyewitness testimony is generally presumed to be more reliable than circumstantial evidence. Studies have shown, however, that individual, separate witness testimony is often flawed, and parts of it can be meaningless. That can occur because of flaws in eyewitness identification (such as faulty observation and recollection, or bias) or because a witness is lying. If several people witness a crime, it is probative to look for similarities in their collective descriptions to substantiate the facts of an event but to keep in mind the contrasts between individual descriptions.
|
|
No blood-stained clothing of his was recovered. He had not driven to the farm as quickly as he could have after his father telephoned because he was afraid, they said. There was no probative value in the finding of a hacksaw in the garden, because Bamber had entered the house via the windows many times, before the killings and since. The defence argued that Sheila was the killer, and that she did know how to handle guns, because she had been raised on a farm and had attended shoots when she was younger.
|
|
The Court insisted that "the present record permits no inference that the California statute had a discriminatory objective." Nor has it been shown that "notwithstanding a legitimate state interest in some form of regulation," § 792 "exceeded the limits necessary to vindicate that interest"; or that § 792 was "an illegitimate attempt to control the conduct of producers beyond the borders of California." Nonetheless, the record was inadequate. Much of the proof was directed to other issues than those that would be probative on these points, and the court and parties left it uncertain what evidence entered the record.
|
|
'Regulation of seizure of motor vehicles (October 2012).' The Attorney General of the Republic instructed all representatives of the Public Ministry to only seize motor vehicles when they constitute a probative and binding element with the process that takes place. The instructions were given through circular number 03646, addressed to the attorney generals, deputies, the prosecutors, and their deputies, as well as to the supervisors. He pointed out that the warning was given to preserving the fundamental right of ownership inherent in every person, which may be violated at the time of kidnapping things, especially motor vehicles. .
|
|
Since the Bare Boys purchases were legal at the time, they did not prove that he was willing to break the law to acquire such materials. "... (E)vidence that merely indicates a generic inclination to act within a broad range, not all of which is criminal, is of little probative value in establishing predisposition", he wrote. "Evidence of predisposition to do what once was lawful is not, by itself, sufficient to show predisposition to do what is now illegal, for there is a common understanding that most people obey the law even when they disapprove of it".Jacobson, Id., at 551.
|
|
The value of a company's intangible assets, such as goodwill, is generally impossible to determine apart from the company's overall enterprise value. For this reason, the asset-based approach is not the most probative method of determining the value of going business concerns. In these cases, the asset-based approach yields a result that is probably lesser than the fair market value of the business. In considering an asset-based approach, the valuation professional must consider whether the shareholder whose interest is being valued would have any authority to access the value of the assets directly.
|
|
To these documents a notary affixes a notarial certificate which attests to the execution of the document, usually by the person who appears before the notary, known as an appearer or constituent (U.S.). In places where lawyer notaries are the norm, a notary may also draft legal instruments known as notarial acts or deeds which have probative value and executory force, as they do in civil law jurisdictions. Originals or secondary originals are then filed and stored in the notary's archives, or protocol. Notaries are generally required to undergo special training in the performance of their duties.
|
|
A "previous consistent statement" is a statement, written or oral, made by a witness prior to testifying, which corresponds with or is substantially similar to his testimony in court. The general rule is that a witness is not allowed to testify about, nor may another witness be called to support, a previous consistent statement. The rationale for the exclusion is the irrelevance of such statements, and their lack of probative value, and the ease with which they can be fabricated. To allow them would be to open the door to much time wasting and the exploration of collateral issues.
|
|
She noted for instance that at the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials (held after the first set of Nuremberg Trials) "American rules of evidence are not to be applied by the judges. Hearsay and double hearsay evidence is permitted, and it is left entirely to the discretion of the judges whether or not the defense be permitted to question the authenticity or probative value of evidence." Utley's book was excoriated by The New York Times but was according to her own publisher praised by Reinhold Niebuhr in The Nation magazine.Henry S. Regnery, Memoirs of a Dissident Publisher , Regnery Gateway Inc.
|
|
Over time, a split of authority grew among lower courts with regard to whether the Fourth Amendment's exigent circumstances exception allowed officers to always conduct warrantless blood tests on individuals suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol because evidence of alcohol was being destroyed by the body's natural metabolic processes.McNeely, 133 S. Ct. at 1558 (discussing split of authority). States that recognized this per se exigency argued that "[o]nce police arrest a suspect for drunk driving, each passing minute eliminates probative evidence of the crime."McNeely, 133 S. Ct. at 1575 (Thomas, J., dissenting).
|
|
In Rome, scribes (scribae) acted as court recorders and copyists of instruments, whereas the notarius took dictation and raw minutes or memoranda (notae) of proceedings in shorthand. Different kinds of notarius existed: some recorded proceedings, others transcribed state papers, some supplied magistrates with legal forms, and others registered judgements and decrees. A number were involved with the noncontentious jurisdiction of the courts by drawing up deeds, wills, and conveyances which could then be sealed before the presiding magistrate and affixed with the official seal of the court, thereby rendering them public and probative acts. Otherwise, most instruments were in private form.
|
|
In the second context, it is used after it has been shown that a defendant had copied to determine if what had been copied is legally actionable or amounts to misappropriation. Some courts use "striking" or "probative" instead of "substantial" to describe the level of similarity needed in the first context to avoid confusion. The second meaning, which Justice Jon O. Newman referred to in 1997 as the more proper use, defines "the threshold for determining that the degree of similarity suffices to demonstrate actionable infringement" exists, "after the fact of copying has been established." Ringgold v.
|
|
Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172 (1997), discussed the limitation on admitting relevant evidence set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403. Under this rule, otherwise relevant evidence may be excluded if the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, misleading the jury, or considerations of undue delay, wasting time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. In this case, Old Chief offered to stipulate to the fact of a prior conviction, which was an element of the crime with which he was charged.
|
|
Until the Federal Rules of Evidence were restyled in 2011, Rule 401 defined relevance as follows: > "Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence > of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more > probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. This definition incorporates the requirement that evidence be both material ("of consequence to the determination of the action") and have probative value ("having any tendency to make the existence of any [material] fact...more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence").Fisher, George. Evidence. pp. 18–19. Foundation Press, 2002.
|
|
Ouellet also confirmed that in 2011, he had "verbally" told Viganò about the restrictions on McCarrick. However, he argued that as these were not formal sanctions, Viganò's letter was "false" for claiming that Benedict imposed sanctions on McCarrick which Francis subsequently lifted. In other passages, Ouellet called Viganò's accusations "far-fetched," "blasphemous," "incomprehensible," and "abhorrent." Many journalists and analysts have pointed out that, despite denouncing the Archbishop, Ouellet confirmed in substance one of Viganò's key claims: Restrictions, even if non-canonical penalties, were imposed on McCarrick because the Vatican authorities were not only aware of the accusations but believed them to be true, even if they lacked probative evidence.
|
|
The danger associated with presenting this other act evidence is that the jury will convict the defendant because of his past actions, not because of his actions in this case. The balance struck by Rule 404 of the Federal Rules of Evidence is: Evidence of a person's prior actions that might adversely reflect on the actor's character is generally forbidden, but evidence that might relate to a relevant issue in the case, such as motive, opportunity, or knowledge, is admissible. In this case, the evidence that Huddleston knew that the televisions were stolen was probative of whether he knew that the videocassettes were stolen. Thus, it was properly admitted.
|
|
Huddleston has been criticized for making it too easy for prosecutors to prove prior, unconvicted offenses for use under FRE 404(b). In response, the American Bar Association has proposed to amend FRE 404 to require that prior offenses be proven by a clear and convincing standard.120 F.R.D. 299, at 330 (1988) Prior to the Court's decision, Edward Imwinkelried had proposed that prosecutors should be burdened to show that admitting the prior offense would be more probative than prejudicial.Imwinkelried, The Need to Amend the Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b): The Threat to the Future of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 30 Vill.
|
|
R v Hart [2014] SCC 52 Writing for a unanimous majority, Justice Moldaver declared that confessions arising from Mr. Big operations would henceforth be considered "presumptively inadmissible, subject to a two-pronged admissibility analysis". The court ruled that the onus is on the Crown to overcome this presumption by demonstrating that the probative value of the evidence resulting from a Mr. Big operation, including the confession, outweighs its prejudicial effect (prong 1). Confirmatory evidence would constitute a "powerful guarantee of reliability". In other words, evidence found during a Mr. Big operation would be a vital factor on the issue of reliability, and not the confession per se.
|
|
Affidavit of Howard Leslie Brennan, May 4, 1964, Warren Commission Hearings, vol. 11, p. 206–207. Because Brennan declined to make a positive identification in the police lineup, the commission regarded Brennan's subsequent testimony (that he sincerely believed he saw Oswald), as probative but not conclusive evidence that Oswald was the gunman in the sixth- floor window. In June 1967, the Associated Press released a 15-page report, prepared by journalists Bernard Gavzer and Sid Moody, that summarized the news agency's six-month investigation supporting the Warren Commission's findings; the report also addressed some of the allegations of its critics and accused them of building their cases upon deliberate omissions.
|
|
In 1983, the CWRIC issued its findings in Personal Justice Denied, concluding that the incarceration of Japanese Americans had not been justified by military necessity. The Commission even stated: "A grave injustice was done to American citizens and resident aliens of Japanese ancestry who, without individual review or any probative evidence against them..." The report determined that the decision to incarcerate was based on "racial prejudice, wartime hysteria, and a failure of political leadership." The Commission concluded that the incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II was a "grave injustice". Lastly, the Commission recommended legislative remedies: an official Government apology and redress payments to survivors.
|
|
Section 43 sets out the restrictions that apply to propensity evidence offered by the prosecution in a criminal proceeding. Such evidence is admissible only if it has a probative value which outweighs any unfairly prejudicial effect on the defendant. The section specifies several matters that the Judge may consider among others. The specified matters include the frequency of the alleged conduct, the timing of the conduct, the similarity between the conduct and the offence charged, the number of persons making allegations against the defendant and the risk of collusion or suggestibility, and the extent to which the conduct and the offence charged are unusual.
|
|
On June 23, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Cosby would be able to appeal his sexual assault conviction based upon questions on testimony from a witness being more prejudicial than probative. The court will hear his appeal on arguments of whether it were proper for five prosecution witnesses to testify in the case and include a deposition that Cosby admitted to giving quaaludes to other women in the past. The court also agreed to review whether a former prosecutor had informed Cosby that he would not be prosecuted for the assault, which resulted in Cosby's agreeing to testify in his accuser's civil lawsuit.
|
|
Substantial similarity, in US copyright law, is the standard used to determine whether a defendant has infringed the reproduction right of a copyright. The standard arises out of the recognition that the exclusive right to make copies of a work would be meaningless if copyright infringement were limited to making only exact and complete reproductions of a work. Many courts also use "substantial similarity" in place of "probative" or "striking similarity" to describe the level of similarity necessary to prove that copying has occurred.Abrams, Howard B. 2 Law of Copyright §14:5 A number of tests have been devised by courts to determine substantial similarity.
|
|
Thus, even if the trial court were to exclude the proffering party's preferred evidence, that party would still have equally probative evidence to fall back on. Thus, the Court reasoned that an assessment of prejudice must be conducted with reference to all the other actually available evidence in the hands of the proffering party. As a general rule, the prosecution is generally entitled to prove its case in the manner it sees fit. Jurors come to court expecting that evidence will be presented to them in narrative fashion, and there is a possibility that jurors may punish a party that does not meet this expectation.
|
|
In adopting the inevitable discovery doctrine in Nix, the Supreme Court discussed the basic reasoning underlying the doctrine. The rationale behind the inevitable discovery exception is the flip side to that underlying the exclusionary rule—the exclusionary rule's purpose is to deter police from violating constitutional and statutory rights. In other words, it functions to make sure the police should not be put in a better place than they would have been had they refrained from illegal conduct. At the same time, there are countervailing interests on the other side of the balance—most importantly, the public interest in having access to all probative evidence of a crime and not allowing guilty individuals to go free.
|
|
Huddleston argued that the mere fact that the evidence was probative was not sufficient to protect him from the danger that the jury might convict him because of the similar act or because, having heard of the similar act, it believed him to be an evil person, and thus might convict him for something other than the crime for which he was charged. This danger is unfair prejudice. Because unfair prejudice might result from introducing similar acts evidence, Huddleston argued that the Rules should require the judge to determine that the similar acts evidence was more likely than not true. The Court rejected this argument as inconsistent with the text and structure of the rules.
|
|
In unsuccessfully making its case, the government of Ohio relied on evidence of fraud from the 2004 petition drive that took place in Ohio to qualify Ralph Nader for the ballot. Judge Dlott criticized this evidence as not proving that the fraud was caused by the method of paying circulators by the signature. Judge Dlott also rejected the value of evidence presented in the case by John Lindback, the Director of the Election Division for the Oregon Secretary of State. Judge Dlott found that the materials presented by Lindback are "almost devoid of factual findings" and overall found that the Lindback exhibits "are not probative even to the extent that they are admissible".
|
|
Evidence Code for domestic violence advocates).CA Codes (evid:1037-1037.8) However, these privileges are not absolute, and may be overruled by a judge upon a showing that "the probative value of the information outweighs the effect of disclosure of the information on the victim, the counseling relationship, and the counseling services", or under a number of other limited circumstances. To respect and preserve the privacy of sensitive material contained in such reports, the judge may require the disclosure of confidential information to take place in camera. So called "priest–penitent" privilege, which precludes forced testimony of confessions made to a priest, minister, or religious adviser are statutorily defined in the United States.
|
|
In contrast, formal evidentiary tests given under implied consent requirements are considered mandatory. Refusal to take a preliminary breath test in the State of Michigan subjects a non-commercial driver to a "civil infraction" fine, with no violation "points", but is not considered to be a refusal under the general "implied consent" law. In some states, the state may present evidence of refusal to take a field sobriety test in court, although this is of questionable probative value in a drunk driving prosecution. Different requirements apply in many states to drivers under DUI probation, in which case participation in a preliminary breath test may be a condition of probation, and for commercial drivers under "drug screening" requirements.
|
|
In contrast, formal evidentiary tests given under implied consent requirements are considered mandatory. Refusal to take a preliminary breath test (PBT) in Michigan subjects a non-commercial driver to a "civil infraction" penalty, with no violation "points", but is not considered to be a refusal under the general "implied consent" law. In some states, the state may present evidence of refusal to take a field sobriety test in court, although this is of questionable probative value in a drunk driving prosecution. Different requirements apply in many states to drivers under DUI probation, in which case participation in a preliminary breath test (PBT) may be a condition of probation, and for commercial drivers under "drug screening" requirements.
|
|
The Court started out by rejecting the assumption that a private medical opinion not based on a complete review of the claims folder is always less sufficient than an opinion based on a complete review of the records. The Court supported this statement by noting that "[b]oth VA medical examiners and private physicians offering medical opinions in veterans benefits cases are nothing more or less than expert witnesses".Id. at 302. The Court, while pointing out that the Board of Veterans Appeals is not bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence, noted that the rules on expert witness testimony are useful in determining probative value as it pertains to medical opinions.
|
|
Justice Stewart, joined by Justice White, dissented, writing that the Fifth Amendment states that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself", and that California's "comment rule" did not "compel" the defendant nor anyone else to testify. Also, "the California procedure is not only designed to protect the defendant against unwarranted inferences which might be drawn by an uninformed jury; it is also an attempt by the State to recognize and articulate what it believes to be the natural probative force of certain facts." Justice Stewart wrote that the formulation of such rules "is properly a matter of local concern", and noted that the American Bar Association and the American Law Institute had endorsed the "comment" practice.
|
|
A forensic chemist from the St. Louis County Crime Laboratory testified that semen was present on swabs from the victim’s rape kit as well as on pantyhose, a towel and the victim’s bed sheets. A forensic hair expert testified that a head hair found on the victim’s bed sheet showed characteristics similar to Briscoe’s head hair. Because there is not adequate empirical data on the frequency of various class characteristics in human hair, an analyst’s assertion that hairs are consistent or similar is inherently prejudicial and lacks probative value. Briscoe's attorney used an alibi defence, stating that Briscoe was at his apartment, watching Game 7 of the 1982 World Series (in which the St. Louis Cardinals defeated the Milwaukee Brewers).
|
|
Nothing definite is known about when Pāṇini lived, not even in which century he lived. Pāṇini has been dated between the seventh or sixth and fourth century BCE. Von Hinüber (1989) based on numismatic arguments and Falk (1993) based on his Indic script studies, place him in mid-fourth century BCE. Others use internal evidence and textual evidence in ancient Indian texts to date him in the sixth or fifth century BCE, while Bod mentions the seventh to fifth century BCE. George Cardona (1997) in his survey and review of Pāṇini-related studies, states that the available evidence strongly supports a dating no later than between 400 to 350 BCE, while earlier dating depends on interpretations and is not probative.
|
|
In resource consent hearings the burden of proof generally falls on the consent applicant to satisfy a hearing panel that the purpose of the Resource Management Act is met by granting rather than refusing consent. Also, a burden of proof lies on any party who wishes a hearing panel (or the Environment Court) to make a determination of adverse or positive effects. A 'scintilla' of probative evidence may be enough to make an issue of a particular adverse effect 'live' and therefore requiring rebuttal if it is not to be found to be established.Carrying the burden: Considering the appropriate evidential tests in resource management decisions , By Claire Kirman, Ellis Gould and Catherine Somerville, Chapman Tripp, Resource Management Journal, August 2006.
|
|
An example: the Rebelde Army dam on the Almendares River was built to provide more water for agriculture, but it has never been filled, because much of it infiltrates into the limestone subsoil, an advantage, because it hydraulically enriches the water table, but then An unforeseen evil occurred: the Almendares stopped flowing from the Lenin Park downstream with sufficient force for the permanence of the current, which resulted in the stagnation of its waters, its greater contamination and rotting. It happened to its waters what happened to a sanitary service that does not discharge its excrement. A faithful and probative picture of what Federico Engels expressed about Nature taking revenge every time Man tries to modify it to a great extent ”.
|
|
' This statement even if it is general, [is :for him probative] since he maintains that statements universally accepted as general take precedence over those that are :specific. Then the Prophet said, ‘... except desolate plots of land; for these belong to God, His messenger then to you.' Now, that :which has been designated as God's and His messenger's falls under the jurisdiction of the Imam. It is thus not permissible for :anyone to act independently regarding such things without the latter's permission, just as is maintained in the case of the one- :fifth portion of booty.... And the Prophet's statement, 'Whoever reclaims a desolate plot of land ...’ merely clarifies the fact- :which we accept-that the means by which one gains ownership over restored land is reclamation, after he obtains permission from :the Imam.
|
|
The saisie-contrefaçon was introduced into French law by the Decree of 19–24 July 1793, which is the first general text concerning the rights of authors of intellectual works, for the protection of the right of reproduction (it was not applicable in the case of a violation of a performance right). At that time, only police commissioners and Justices of the Peace (the predecessors of instance court judges) were entitled to carry out a saisie-contrefaçon. The saisie-contrefaçon was conceived more as a type of protective measure (and was characterised as such by previous laws) than as a probative measure. The saisie-contrefaçon therefore had a monitoring and even criminal and protective nature, certain traits of which have remained in practice (for example, deposit of the seized objects at the court clerk’s office).
|
|
Also from Fulgentius in De Trinitate ad Felicem: Today these references are generally accepted as probative to the verse being in the Bible of Fulgentius.In the historic debate, Thomas Emlyn, George Benson, Richard Porson, Samuel Lee and John Oxlee denied these references as demonstrating the verse as in the Bible of Fulgentius, by a set of differing rationales. Henry Thomas Armfield reviews debate theories and history and offered his conclusion "Surely it is quite clear from the writings of Fulgentius, both that he had himself seen the verse in the copies of the New Testament; and that those with whom he argues had not the objection to offer that the verse was not then extant in St. John's Epistle." Armfield, The Three Witnesses, the Disputed Text, 1883, p.171.
|
|
Patterns of crime generated through data analytics are unlikely to generate the level of accurate predictive detail required for police officers to effect an arrest, when compared to informed tip offs. While in the US, courts have allowed profiling to be used in stopping and searching persons in the right context, notable judicial dissents and academic research highlight that profiling lacks probative value. In the UK, a House of Lords Report recommended that such technology be prohibited from use by local authorities, unless they were tied to the investigation of serious criminal offenses. In addition, a major factor in Europe is that predictive policing technology must be exercised in accordance with legislation that is sufficiently clear on the scope of use (foreseeability) and affords persons adequate legal protection from arbitrary uses of predictive data algorithms.
|
|
The Copyright Law of El Salvador has a application for authors who want to provide their rights from the illegal piracy, probative media means before third parties and attests to the existence of the work, interpretation or production. However, There are some limitations exceptions in copyright in which anyone can make use of the works without the authorization of the author or right holder. Examples are: Regarding works which is already lawfully disclosed, it is allowed without authorization of the author or remuneration. The reproduction of a work of art on permanent display in a street, square or other public place in an artistic medium different from that used for the making of the original; with regard to buildings, this right shall be limited to the outer walls.
|
|
In France, notarial instruments, whether in public (en minute) or private form (en brevet), have a high degree of authority and are considered probative instruments (acte authentique), received as firsthand and primary evidence in court, and thereby accorded high evidentiary value and executory force, and deemed to be proof of their contents. A notarial instrument also fixes the date at which its parties are bound without prior delivery and acceptance (as opposed to a deed or contract under common law) and the data certa (date certaine) of the act's execution so as to safeguard against third party claims. To be rebutted or challenged, a notarial act must be subjected to a rescissory action called an improbation action (inscription de faux) to prove the act contains errors or has been maliciously altered, interlineated, edited, or falsified.Serge Guinchard and Gabriel Montaignier, eds. (2007).
|
|
53–54 "It is admittedly an argument from silence, but in this case the silence is practically probative, because we have a story which gives a vivid picture of Jewish relations with the Parthian administration in Babylonia." An example of a convincing application is the silence of Cicero on works of oratory by Cato; the argument gaining its strength from the fact that Cato was such an important figure in Cicero's Brutus and he would have likely been cited if possible.The School of Rome: Latin Studies and the Origins of Liberal Education by W. Martin Bloomer (2011) p. 153 Although Cicero's silence on Cato is a convincing argument from silence, the same strength does not apply to Cicero's silence on the questorship of Caelius, Michael Alexander stating that a number of factors may have precluded Cicero from mentioning it.
|
|
The Korean rules of evidence confer a high probative value to so-called suspect interrogation records produced by the prosecutors, which is "a protocol containing a statement of a suspect or of any other person, prepared by a public prosecutor or a judicial police".Yong Chul Park, "Does it Matter Who Wrote It?: the Admissibility of Suspect Interrogation Record Written by Prosecutors in Korea", Journal of Korean Law, Volume 6, Number 2, 181 (2007) However, this document is technically hearsay under the English American legal system and contains a record of a confession made without assistance of legal counsel. While either the police officer or prosecutor can produce a suspect interrogation record, one made by a prosecutor is admissible if the suspect confirms the authenticity of the record at a preparatory hearing or during the trial.
|
|
DUI: Refusal to Take a Field Test, or Blood, Breath or Urine Test, NOLO Press Regardless of the terminology, in order to sustain a conviction based on evidential tests, probable cause must be shown (or the suspect must volunteer to take the evidential test without implied consent requirements being invoked). Refusal to take a preliminary breath test (PBT) in Michigan subjects a non-commercial driver to a "civil infraction" penalty, with no violation "points", but is not considered to be a refusal under the general "implied consent" law. In some states, the state may present evidence of refusal to take a field sobriety test in court, although this is of questionable probative value in a drunk driving prosecution. Different requirements apply in many states to drivers under DUI probation, in which case participation in a preliminary breath test (PBT) may be a condition of probation.
|
|
This rule was in error, the Court wrote, because it required the trial judge to focus on the strength of the prosecution's case instead of the probative value or the potential adverse effects of admitting the defense evidence of third-party guilt. The Court also believed that, as applied in this case, the rule did not seem to require any substantial examination of the credibility of the prosecution's witnesses or the reliability of its evidence. Holmes had argued that the forensic evidence was so unreliable that it should not have been admitted, yet in its evaluation of the "strength" of that evidence, the South Carolina Supreme Court made no mention of these defense challenges. The Court stated that the rule was no more logical than if it were to instead exclude the prosecutor's evidence of the defendant's guilt if the defendant were able to present evidence that, if believed, strongly supported a not guilty verdict.
|
|
Symbol of copyzero Copyzero is a mechanism of protection of works by means of a qualified digital signature and a time mark. This mechanism lies in converting the work into digital format and appending the digital signature (which characterizes the author of the work) and a time mark (which indicates the existence of the work since given time) to the file. In the Italian legal system, the digital signature has the same probative value as a certificate of SIAE (Società Italiana degli Autori ed Editori, Italian society of authors and publishers) but a cost much smaller (0,36 Euro, cost of one time mark, rather than corresponding 110 euro for renewal of the certificate every 5 years). The duration of a time mark is 4 years: in order to extend the period of validity it is sufficient to append a new time mark to the marked file before the old time mark expires.
|
|
Examples of motions in limine would be that the attorney for the defendant may ask the judge to refuse to admit into evidence any personal information, or medical, criminal or financial records, using the legal grounds that these records are irrelevant, immaterial, unreliable, or unduly prejudicial, and/or that their probative value is outweighed by the prejudicial result to the defendant, or that the admittance of such information or evidence would otherwise violate one of the court's rules of evidence. A party proffering certain evidence can also ask for the admission of certain information or evidence via a motion in limine. If the motion in limine to exclude evidence is granted, then the excluded records are prohibited from being presented without specific approval from the judge at the time the party wants to offer the evidence. A reference to such "highly prejudicial" evidence contrary to the tribunal's order is a ground for a mistrial.
|
|
Digital evidence or electronic evidence is any probative information stored or transmitted in digital form that a party to a court case may use at trial. Before accepting digital evidence a court will determine if the evidence is relevant, whether it is authentic, if it is hearsay and whether a copy is acceptable or the original is required. The use of digital evidence has increased in the past few decades as courts have allowed the use of e-mails, digital photographs, ATM transaction logs, word processing documents, instant message histories, files saved from accounting programs, spreadsheets, internet browser histories, databases, the contents of computer memory, computer backups, computer printouts, Global Positioning System tracks, logs from a hotel’s electronic door locks, and digital video or audio files. Many courts in the United States have applied the Federal Rules of Evidence to digital evidence in a similar way to traditional documents, although important differences such as the lack of established standards and procedures have been noted.
|
|
In what appears to have been a response to lingering skepticism, on September 16, 2008, the FBI asked the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to conduct an independent review of the scientific evidence that led the agency to implicate U.S. Army researcher Bruce Ivins in the anthrax letter attacks of 2001. However, despite taking this action, Director Mueller said that the scientific methods applied in the investigation had already been vetted by the research community through the involvement of several dozen nonagency scientists. The NAS review officially got underway on April 24, 2009. While the scope of the project included the consideration of facts and data surrounding the investigation of the 2001 Bacillus anthracis mailings, as well as a review of the principles and methods used by the FBI, the NAS committee was not given the task to "undertake an assessment of the probative value of the scientific evidence in any specific component of the investigation, prosecution, or civil litigation", nor to offer any view on the guilt or innocence of any of the involved people.
|
|
The English noun "probate" derives directly from the Latin verb probare,Collins Dictionary of the English Language to try, test, prove, examine,Cassell's Latin Dictionary more specifically from the verb's past participle nominative neuter probatum,Testamentum, the participle refers to, being a neuter noun "having been proved". Historically during many centuries a paragraph in Latin of standard format was written by scribes of the particular probate court below the transcription of the will, commencing with the words (for example): Probatum Londini fuit huismodi testamentum coram venerabili viro (name of approver) legum doctore curiae prerogativae Cantuariensis... ("A testament of such a kind was proved at London in the presence of the venerable man ..... doctor of law at the Prerogative Court of Canterbury...")Text from will of James Boevey (d.1696) The earliest usage of the English word was in 1463, defined as "the official proving of a will". The term "probative," used in the law of evidence, comes from the same Latin root but has a different English usage.
|
|
An electronic signature is intended to provide a secure and accurate identification method for the signatory to provide a seamless transaction. Definitions of electronic signatures vary depending on the applicable jurisdiction. A common denominator in most countries is the level of an advanced electronic signature requiring that: # The signatory can be uniquely identified and linked to the signature # The signatory must have sole control of the private key that was used to create the electronic signature # The signature must be capable of identifying if its accompanying data has been tampered with after the message was signed # In the event that the accompanying data has been changed, the signature must be invalidated Electronic signatures may be created with increasing levels of security, with each having its own set of requirements and means of creation on various levels that prove the validity of the signature. To provide an even stronger probative value than the above described advanced electronic signature, some countries like the European Union or Switzerland introduced the qualified electronic signature.
|
|
" On September 24, 1993, Maco held a news conference to say that he would not pursue the molestation allegation, despite having probable cause, citing a desire not to traumatize Dylan. In the official statement of decision of the prosecution, Maco acknowledged that even in the case of custody and with a more favorable standard of proof for the accusation than "beyond a reasonable doubt" it had been impossible to reach the conclusion that the abuse had occurred. He also said that the nature of the evidence was fertile ground for the defense and “would not have the same probative as it did in the New York Supreme Court custody case” and that he considered his duty “to avoid the unjustifiable risk of exposing a child to the rigors and uncertainties of a questionable prosecution". In a letter to the New York Department of Social Services, Allen's psychotherapist Kathryn Prescott said that his psychological profile "was definitely not that of a sexual offender" and also said, “There has never been any suggestion that Mr. Allen was suffering from a sexual perversion / deviant sexual behavior.
|
|