Both have to do with exchanging something for something else of value.
|
|
Washington (CNN)Quid pro quo: A Latin term meaning something for something.
|
|
The very essence of politics is quid pro quo—Latin for "something for something".
|
|
Quid pro quo is a Latin term that means "something for something," as CNN's Veronica Stracqualursi wrote last month.
|
|
But there will always be a tug and a push and a pull, and you will always feel like you're sacrificing something for something else.
|
|
Sondland says Trump wanted to withhold the aid over concerns about corruption in Ukraine and denies there was a "quid pro quo" - a Latin phrase meaning something for something - of any kind.
|
|
They took their authority from the Senate. Until the times of the Mithridatic Wars, the system seems to have been operative, supported by the custom of making an informal agreement, English "deal," featuring a quid pro quo, "something for something," for each side. Livy's basic word for this arrangement is a verb, convenire, "come together". AppianCivil Wars, Book I, "Introduction" explains in Greek that in the period of the civil wars, this arrangement ceased to be effective: the magistrates attacked each other with all the resources at their command.
|
|
Antichristus,Passional Christi und Antichristi Full view on Google Books a woodcut by Lucas Cranach the Elder, of the pope using the temporal power to grant authority to a ruler contributing generously to the Catholic Church Quid pro quo ("something for something" in LatinMerriam-Webster, the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (Fourth Edition)) is a Latin phrase used in English to mean an exchange of goods or services, in which one transfer is contingent upon the other; "a favor for a favor". Phrases with similar meanings include: "give and take", "tit for tat", "you scratch my back, and I'll scratch yours", and "one hand washes the other". Other languages use other phrases for the same purpose.
|
|
The Ellemann–Jensen doctrine is thus, that a small country - like Denmark - can affect world politics through successfully building alliances to promote its foreign policy goals. An unstated implication of this is obviously that a small country should therefore also be willing to adopt and support the goals of its allies in a quid pro quo (something for something) for them supporting its own goals. Under the following government led by the Danish Social Democrats the Ellemann–Jensen doctrine was carried on, and Denmark did not only dispatch peacekeepers to the Balkans in the 1990s, but also had no qualms about committing them to fight if need be. Denmark also became more vocal in the United Nations, launching - for instance - resolutions against human rights abuses in China.
|
|
While the model began as a temporary form of housing for workers migrating to cities, most view the foyer model as a philosophical approach applied to concrete implementations of transitional housing.Adam Steen, David Mackensie. Financial Analysis of Foyer and Foyer-line Youth Housing Models. Swinburne University, Homelessness Research Collective, June The Foyer Federation, an organization in the United Kingdom founded in 1992 to "innovate, champion service reform, and ensure the Foyer network can deliver the best quality offer for young people" defines the concept in a set of three promises: # a safe, balanced community of 16-25 year olds in transition # an integrated offer that covered housing, education, employment, and personal development skills # a relationship that tailored a 'something-for-something' deal between the young person, service, and locality, on which the offer of accommodation depended Anderson, I. and Quilgars, D., two researchers who studied the effectiveness of the initial U.K. foyers in the early 1990s described the foyer concept as an "integrated approach to meeting the needs of young people during their transition from dependence to independence by linking affordable accommodation to training and employment".
|
|