To be clear, I do not mean to suggest that these reexaminations are easy.
|
|
Its next move is to begin sending requests for ex parte reexaminations to the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
|
|
Murphy's mission in his storytelling seems to be offering critical reexaminations of major events of the 90s, many of which we may see differently from our current social and political climate.
|
|
The scientific consensus that most brains do not fully develop until age 25 has led to a host of reforms in the criminal justice system and reexaminations about how society should punish young adults.
|
|
His counterpart at Harvard, President Drew G. Faust, has pushed back against such reexaminations, saying that such name changes make it "too easy to feel innocent" about disturbing chapters of the past instead of learning from them.
|
|
At least 2126 workers have been killed in accidents during its construction, and 2000 people face criminal charges in Hong Kong over faked concrete quality tests, which have raised questions about the structure's integrity and required costly reexaminations.
|
|
Over the years, its emerging status as the stuff of internet legend spawned intense think pieces ranging from tongue-in-cheek feminist reexaminations of the text to deep dives into the ongoing question of who wrote it and why.
|
|
Pompeo said the committee will conduct "one of the most profound reexaminations of the unalienable rights in the world since the 1948 Universal Declaration," of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations, declaring that "all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights" and are entitled to a series of rights.
|
|
The NTP patents covering BlackBerry technology are currently undergoing a number of reexaminations because new prior art has been discovered which had not been considered by the patent office when the patent applications were first examined. Some of these reexaminations are inter partes, some of them are ex parte, some of them were initiated by the director. Some of the patents have had a number of reexaminations filed. These multiple reexaminations have been merged into single reexaminations, each for the patent in question.
|
|
In three of the cases, the patent office disagreed and felt that the new prior art was not sufficiently strong to warrant a reexamination. In the other seven cases, the patent office agreed and ordered reexaminations. All reexaminations were still ongoing as of January 2007.
|
|
747 requests for ex parte reexaminations were filed in FY2012 (corresponding to about 0.28% of the total number of patents issued that year), though roughly 90% of these requests were made by the patent owner.USPTO FY2012 Performance and Accountability Report, Tables 14A and 6 Some 640 requests for inter partes reexaminations were filed during FY2012, a figure that has been rising susbstantially every year and a fourfold increase since FY2008.USPTO FY2012 Performance and Accountability Report, Table 14B Statistics released by the USPTO for reexaminations for the period of 1981 to 2007 showed that for ex parte reexaminations, claims were changed in average 64% of the cases. In 26% of the cases, all claims are confirmed with no changes, while in 10% of the cases, all claims were invalidated.
|
|
The proceedings of all reexaminations are made available to the public on the USPTO's public PAIR (Patent Application Information Retrieval) web site.USPTO’s public PAIR (Patent Application Information Retrieval) Reexaminations are assigned serial numbers and cross referenced as child applications of originally issued patents. The process of reexamination has the potential to increase the quality of patents issued and to encourage public input in the process.
|
|
The patent office itself may initiate "director initiated" reexaminations, for example, when there is reason to question the validity of the patent. The director, for example, ordered reexaminations of the NTP, Inc. patents which covered BlackBerry mobile e-mail technology. Once a reexamination is ordered, a new examiner is assigned to the case, and the patent goes through another examination similar to the examination it received the first time around.
|
|
Ex parte reexaminations are initiated by members of the public, but once said members submit their request, they no longer actively participate in the proceedings. The correspondence is strictly between the examiner and the patent owner. The fee for filing a request for an ex parte reexamination is $6,000 as of January 16, 2018.USPTO Fee Schedule Inter partes reexaminations were initiated by members of the public, and said members of the public then participated in the proceedings.
|
|
On September 16, 2012, Leahy-Smith America Invents Act eliminated these proceedings and replaced them with two new post grant proceedings (Post-Grant Review and Inter Partes Review). Duplicate requests for Inter partes reexaminations by the same requesting party are prohibited under 35 U.S.C. § 317.35 U.S.C. § 317, found at Inter partes reexamination prohibited at Bitlaw.com website. Accessed July 3, 2008.
|
|
The culture is identified by the distinctive Clovis point, a flaked flint spear-point with a notched flute, by which it was inserted into a shaft. Dating of Clovis materials has been by association with animal bones and by the use of carbon dating methods. Recent reexaminations of Clovis materials using improved carbon-dating methods produced results of 11,050 and 10,800 radiocarbon years B.P. (roughly 9100 to 8850 BCE). A Folsom point for a spear The Folsom Tradition was characterized by the use of Folsom points as projectile tips and activities known from kill sites, where slaughter and butchering of bison took place.
|
|
Based on the presence and significance of intact archaeological or paleontological deposits, the site was nominated eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion D of 36 CFR 60.4. This site was listed on the National Register on July 12, 2011. The site was once again studied in 2012 through extensive excavation by a team from the Center for the Study of the First Americans at Texas A&M; University. As part of that effort the team conducted reexaminations of all existing site materials and data, including a reanalysis of all stone and bone artifacts identified to date and their provenience within the site.
|
|
NTP became suspicious of contacts between RIM and the PTO, prompting the company to file FOIA requests which revealed attempts by RIM attorney David Stewart to obtain off-the-record interviews with PTO examiners,Raymond Mercado, New Light on the Blackberry Litigation, IP Law & Business magazine. Report on allegations of impropriety by RIM and the PTO during reexaminations of NTP's patents though such interviews are prohibited by federal regulations (e.g., 37 CFR 1.560(a), stating that "requests that reexamination requesters participate in interviews with examiners will not be granted" and 37 CFR 1.955 stating that "interviews prohibited in inter partes reexamination proceedings"). RIM and NTP filed thousands of pages of documentation and expert opinions to support their respective positions.
|
|
The contingency model stated that various leadership styles would be more or less effective depending on the situation (Den Hartog & Koopman, 2001; Fiedler, 1965; Hunt, 1967). Path-goal theory proposed that subordinates would be satisfied with their leader if they perceived that their leader's behavior would bring them future satisfaction. Subordinates would be motivated by their leader if they perceived that completing work tasks would bring them satisfaction, and if the leader provided proper coaching, support, rewards, and guidance (House, 1996). Frustrations with not being able to find significant results with anyone's theory resulted in the development of reexaminations and new approaches, including questioning which situations necessitated a leader figure and which did not (Den Hartog & Koopman, 2001).
|
|
Opponents noted that the AIA contained a provision that would deny the right of patent owners to obtain judicial review of adverse USPTO decisions in ex parte patent reexaminations by civil action in district court – a right that has existed under / § 145 since the inception of reexamination in 1980. They contended that abolishing this right will leave direct appeal to the Federal Circuit as the only judicial recourse – an intolerable scenario for patent owners who need to rely on evidence that was unavailable during the administrative appeal stage. Opponents contended that this provision will exacerbate ex parte reexamination abuses by creating an unprecedented end-run around Federal District Courts in potentially all patent disputes. They warned that alleged infringers would simply file ex parte reexamination requests with USPTO, receive a final agency decision subject only to Federal Circuit review, essentially bypassing Federal courts.
|
|
If the patent office accepts claims that have been invented, published or even patented before, ignoring material prior art, then even existing technologies in use are subject to patent trolling. Reexamination to invalidate the patent based on prior art can be requested, but requests are typically made only after a lawsuit is filed or threatened (about 0.33% of patents in U.S. have re- examination requested)USPTO 2005 annual report , Table 13A and 13B and often in conjunction with an infringement lawsuit.Robert A. Saltzberg and Mehran Arjomand, Reexaminations Increase in Popularity , Morrison and Foerster, September 2007 Only the patent holder will participate in this process, and the party requesting the reexamination has no right of appeal and is estopped from using the same evidence in any subsequent civil action; this risk keeps the popularity of reexamination low despite its lower cost.Patent Reexamination by Robert J. Yarbrough.
|
|