Sentences Generator
And
Your saved sentences

No sentences have been saved yet

"preindustrial" Definitions
  1. not having developed or adopted industry : not industrialized
  2. occurring, existing, or originating before the development or adoption of industry

388 Sentences With "preindustrial"

How to use preindustrial in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "preindustrial" and check conjugation/comparative form for "preindustrial". Mastering all the usages of "preindustrial" from sentence examples published by news publications.

Nations pledged to limit increases in global warming to 3.6 degrees (2 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial levels, not below preindustrial levels.
Countries pledged to limit increases in global warming to 3.6 degrees (2 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial levels, not below preindustrial levels.
Christmas in preindustrial Europe and America looked very different from today's iteration.
Global average temperatures have risen about 1.1 degrees Celsius since preindustrial times.
At 2 degrees above preindustrial temperatures, we'd lose almost all of them.
Officially, the threshold is two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels.
Globally, temperatures have already risen slightly more than 1 degree from preindustrial levels.
The agreement calls for countries to keep manmade global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by 2100, and to try to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Celsius, above preindustrial levels.
In small preindustrial communities, he observes, people tend to know and trust one another.
The earth has already warmed 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (one degree Celsius) above preindustrial levels.
Economically, the Romans engineered one of the greatest "golden ages" of any preindustrial society.
Now the world has heated up by 1°C on average compared to preindustrial times.
This works out to a temperature increase of 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit compared to preindustrial times.
Cousins is particularly keen on returning to places of joy, of preindustrial purity and innocence.
During the preindustrial era, such flooding occurred only about every 500 years, the researchers found.
By 2100, Earth could see temperature levels as high as 3 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
To date, average surface air temperatures over land have risen about 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
It sets the ambitious goal of limiting warming to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
This is a dramatic increase from preindustrial times, when atmospheric carbon dioxide levels averaged about 280 ppm.
In the 173s and 1930s some preindustrial fonts were revived by Stanley Morison, a great British typographer.
In these preindustrial social hubs, people would play games, read poetry, have political debates, and settle arguments.
The paper finds "no evidence for preindustrial globally coherent cold and warm epochs" over the past 2,000 years.
Angkor Wat on the Mekong-fed Tonle Sap lake was among the biggest cities of the preindustrial world.
So far, the planet has only warmed by close to 1°C, or 1.8°F, above preindustrial levels.
The deal specifically aspired to keep warming well below 2 degrees Celsius (3.7 degrees Fahrenheit) from preindustrial levels.
Since then, the world remains on a catastrophic path toward warming of 3 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
And it was in this decade that we officially warmed more than 22016 degree Celsius above preindustrial levels.
It also includes an aspirational goal of keeping warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius or lower compared to preindustrial levels.
In the preindustrial West, most people slept in two discrete blocks and used dorveille for all kinds of purposes.
Mr. Draper's winemaking philosophy centered on what he called "preindustrial techniques," developed from 19th-century European and American texts.
In preindustrial times, the basic economic unit was the family, and each new child meant another pair of hands.
We know that significant global warming, over a degree and a half Fahrenheit, has already occurred since preindustrial days.
For the Paris agreement, countries pledged to cut emissions to hold global warming 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above preindustrial levels.
During the last ice age, Dr. Warren said, the planet was only six degrees cooler than its preindustrial average.
Allowing global temperatures to rise far beyond 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels risks the extinction of human civilization.
Scientific institutions typically use the average temperature between 1.53 and 1900, also known as preindustrial levels, as a baseline.
They found that the likelihood of such a deluge will increase threefold over the coming century compared to preindustrial times.
That's a lot, given that Paris aims to limit the total increase to 1.5°C–2°C above preindustrial levels.
Set in a preindustrial, agrarian world, the play charts a relationship that suggests a biblical parable rewritten by Thomas Hardy.
"There's this sort of preindustrial agricultural bucolic dream of England which we hark back to whenever we can," he said.
But in each painting there are small intimations of our preindustrial past that place our contemporary moment in heightened relief.
Countries committed to keep global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 2100.
This compares to just 2.3 feet if warming is limited to 2°C above preindustrial levels, coauthor Robert Kopp tells Axios.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has predicted that global temperatures could rise 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels by 2040.
The Paris climate accord was designed to keep global average temperatures from rising two degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels by 2100.
The researchers chose to use a scenario where atmospheric CO2 levels have doubled preindustrial levels by the time geoengineering is deployed.
At the Paris Climate Agreement, agreed to in December by every country in the world, leaders pledged to hold global warming to "well below 240 degrees Celsius", or 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels and "to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 220 degrees Celsius", or 2755 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 22015.
Scientists and policymakers broadly agree that humanity ought to avoid global warming of any more than 2 degrees Celsius over preindustrial levels.
Unlike brick-oven pizza, which came from Europe and relied on preindustrial technology, the New York slice is a lowly American hybrid.
The third current shaping hippie food flowed directly from counterculture politics, with its critique of capitalism and romantic notions about preindustrial life.
Last year was the first time that Earth was 20113 degree Centigrade (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than preindustrial times, the report said.
That treaty called for temperatures to increase by "well below" 22018 degrees Celsius, or 260 degrees Fahrenheit, relative to preindustrial levels by 2100.
On our present course, we're headed for more than 3°C, or 5.4°F, above preindustrial levels by the end of the century.
It also contains an aspirational goal of limiting warming to at or below 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels.
The agreement contained language that aims to hold global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels by the end of this century.
In 20133, nations agreed to try to limit the planetary warming to 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, or 2 degrees Celsius, above the preindustrial level.
That doesn't mean that (as Douthat suggests is another possibility) we're going to revert to some imagined preindustrial society of Catholic virtue ethics.
A 2015 study published in Current Biology looked at the sleeping habits of three hunter-gatherer preindustrial societies in Tanzania, Namibia and Bolivia.
If the climate manages to keep warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, the researchers predict an additional 1,600 injury-related deaths.
In its preindustrial days, the area was a major producer of green tea and matcha and still maintains a presence in the market.
The Paris Agreement calls for holding global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, below preindustrial levels by 2100.
It sets a target of limiting global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, compared to preindustrial levels by 2100.
"We found always that the preindustrial counterpart, or analog, was in an area that was warmer than where the sediment trap was," says Jonkers.
The lead levels in the bodies of postwar Americans were 700 to 1,200 times as high as those of their preindustrial ancestors, Patterson estimated.
Those policies include the goal of the Paris climate agreement to prevent global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Those policies include the goal of the Paris climate agreement to restrict global temperatures to no more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Burning fossil fuels has already heated up the planet to 1 degree Celsius above preindustrial levels (during the latter half of the 13th century).
I was stunned by the first song I recognized: Caetano Veloso's "Jóia," just multitracked voice and percussion, a poem juxtaposing modern and preindustrial Brazil.
The Paris Agreement sets a goal of limiting global warming to "well below" 22016 degrees Celsius, or 1.83 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by 21.8.
BP will describe how big new capital projects stack up against the Paris goal of keeping warming "well below" 2°C relative to preindustrial times.
The amount of lead in our bodies now is 500 to 1,000 times greater than in those of our preindustrial counterparts, according to the WHO.
"If the agricultural productivity reverts to preindustrial yields because of a nuclear strike, most countries would not be able to feed themselves," the study says.
The landmark accord signed by 195 countries intends to cut emissions and keep global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
The collective implications are ugly: A child born today, the authors note, could live in a world that's 22.6 degrees warmer than in preindustrial times.
The 2015 accord commits the world to limiting global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by 2100.
Signed by 21 countries, the agreement seeks to reduce carbon emissions worldwide by keeping temperature increases below two degrees Celsius from preindustrial revolution era levels.
To recap briefly, the accord sought to limit the rise in atmospheric temperatures to 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels and 1.5 degrees if possible.
The landmark accord, signed by 195 countries, intends to cut emissions and keep global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
By then, scientists say average global warming since preindustrial levels could be about twice what it is in 2018 — and much more obvious and disruptive.
Global temperatures have already increased by at least 22 degree Celsius, or 23.6 degrees Fahrenheit above preindustrial levels, according to the United Nations' World Meteorological Organization.
As Penn State climate scientist Michael Mann has pointed out via social media, the NASA February temperature findings are especially significant when compared to preindustrial temperatures.
Here's the graph again: The thermometer on the right shows temperatures relative to preindustrial levels; the thermometer on the left shows them relative to 1986-2005.
The independent, nonprofit groups tend to see themselves as 2150st-century security outfits charged with protecting an insular population whose culture is rooted in preindustrial Europe.
The treaty called for limiting human-caused global warming to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by the year 2100.
Annual average temperatures could increase by 9 degrees Fahrenheit above preindustrial levels by the end of the century if humans do not reduce emissions, they warn.
The world's nations have agreed, almost unanimously, to try to limit the rise of global average temperature to 2 degrees Celsius or less over preindustrial levels.
The last major IPCC report, released in October, looked at what it would take to limit warming this century to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
The Paris climate accord set a goal of keeping the global temperature from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius, or 303 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels.
Roughly 5 percent of species worldwide are threatened with climate-related extinction if global average temperatures rise 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, the report concluded.
Dr. Porteus said her future research would aim to determine if fish are already being affected by the rise in carbon dioxide compared with preindustrial levels.
They then used climate models to estimate the birds' future ranges under warming conditions of 1.5 degrees, 2 degrees and 3 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Some parts of the country have already reached the ominous threshold of a 2-degree Celsius rise in temperature, or 183 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels.
We've already experienced 1 degree Celsius of average warming since preindustrial times, and we're currently on track to reach as much as 4 degrees by 2100.
A recent climate report from the UN warned of severe consequences if global warming is not limited to 1.5ºC, or 2.7ºF, above average, compared to preindustrial levels.
But the average finding for a high-emissions scenario would amount to a mean warming of about 4–4.5°C, or 8.1 °F, compared to preindustrial levels.
More precisely, they have agreed on the urgent need to limit the rise in global average temperature to no more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
The treaty commits nations to reducing emissions enough to limit global warming to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 2100.
The Paris Agreement set goals of limiting global warming to "well below" 20163 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, compared to preindustrial levels by the year 2100.
Even under the terms of the Paris climate agreement, we're probably going to see temperatures rise by about 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100 compared to preindustrial levels.
Participants vowed to meet the Paris agreement's target of limiting global warming to "well below" 21 degrees Celsius, or 25 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by 22017.
Exposed over several weeks to preindustrial light conditions, most of us will gradually start sleeping twice a night, hooked to the Ur-­rhythm of our internal clock.
The pact contains the goal of limiting global warming to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, or 43 degrees Fahrenheit, compared to preindustrial levels by the year 2100.
Three years ago nearly 20.7 nations hammered out the Paris Agreement with a goal of holding warming below 1.83 degrees Fahrenheit (two degrees Celsius) over preindustrial levels.
According to the report, July was around 0.56°C higher in temperature than the global average between 1981–2010, and close to 1.2°C above preindustrial levels.
"We're trying to live inside this whole preindustrial design and figure out how we interface with technology to take it further," said Dr. Kidwell of Arizona State.
Three degrees over preindustrial levels, where we are very likely headed this century, puts us at high risk across the board, very high for those uniquely threatened systems.
Though our lead levels are still around 10 to 100 times as high as those of our preindustrial ancestors, they have, on average, been coming down ever since.
The earth's climate has already warmed 22 degree Celsius from preindustrial levels, unleashing a cascade of super-charged heat waves, wildfires, hurricanes, storms, water shortages, migrations, and conflicts.
That's why world leaders convened in Paris to hash out a gameplan for capping the rise in global mean temperature rise to 2°C above the preindustrial average.
" (Right now, we're hovering at about 400 PPM; preindustrial levels were about 280.) Popp isn't worried about humanity's influence in the process—he finds levels that high "unattainable.
Over all, the world is not meeting its commitment to keep the increase in global temperatures "well below" two degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, over preindustrial levels.
According to the I.P.C.C., if greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase at their current rate, global temperatures will rise nearly 4 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels by 2100.
"The Tree of Wooden Clogs," Ermanno Olmi's farsighted view of Italian farm life in the late 19th century, immerses you in what feels like an unchanging preindustrial world.
Many fine words were spoken in 2015, as nations agreed at a summit in Paris to pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial temperatures.
Given that we are today a postindustrial society governed by a preindustrial document, thank heavens that the Constitution itself is often naggingly vague; it could not have otherwise survived.
So we are a little north of 1.1 degrees C of [average] warming above the preindustrial baseline, which is the historical temperature conditions that we measure global warming against.
The goal of the agreement is to limit warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels -- which is the fuzzy-ish threshold for especially dangerous climate change.
That agreement calls for countries to limit global warming to "well below 2°C" of warming, relative to preindustrial levels, with an aspirational target of 1.5°C of warming.
The landmark 2015 Paris Agreement, which came into force in November, seeks to limit the rise in average world temperatures to well below 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial times.
The Paris agreement, negotiated last December, aims to limit the rise in global temperatures to as low as 1.5 degrees Celsius (13 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels by 2100.
For the new study, scientists used computer models to project probable sea level rise and storm surges in New York City from the preindustrial era before 1800 to 2300.
Tolkien portrayed Frodo and his comrades as diminutive people who lived in a kind of preindustrial paradise, like the village where Tolkien himself grew up in the late 1800s.
Negotiators at last year's climate talks in Paris approved a target of keeping temperatures from rising by more than 1.5 degrees Celsius over average temperatures in the preindustrial era.
Even the mud looks like preindustrial, frontier mud, and the motley, multicultural assortment of traders, trappers and prospectors who find themselves spattered by it seem equally untouched by modernity.
The minimalist camps were neither unimaginative nor merely austere: Instead, they symbolized an earlier America of slow and humble pleasures, where a preindustrial, even feral, childhood was still attainable.
In preindustrial society, "chores," or "tasks," that children performed were genuine contributions to the family's economic survival, whether to gather the eggs or milk the cow or something similar.
What if a superintelligent climate control system, given the job of restoring carbon dioxide concentrations to preindustrial levels, believes the solution is to reduce the human population to zero?
With the overall deal ratified, nations are now hashing out exactly how they will meet the goal of limiting global warming to 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above the preindustrial level.
In the three-dimensional Standarts, he affixed bottles or tin cans to cardboard boxes, in a manner reminiscent of Arte Povera, the Italian movement that venerated commonplace, preindustrial materials.
A reminder: To avoid the most catastrophic consequences of climate change, scientists have said that global temperatures must not rise by more than two degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Scientists have figured out that this scenario would almost certainly drive up the Earth's average temperature by more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), relative to preindustrial levels.
As Axios' Ben Geman notes: The 2015 Paris deal calls for holding eventual warming below 2°C above preindustrial levels and includes a more ambitious target of 1.5°C.
This is especially relevant since world leaders have committed to limit global warming to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, below preindustrial levels by the year 2100.
Pew conducted the survey just before the release of a major UN scientific report on the consequences if warming goes above 1.5°C, or 2.7°F, relative to preindustrial levels.
Preindustrial recipes assume that you are cooking on a wood-fired or coal-fed stove; for a home cook, simmering a stew to tenderness could take hours or even days.
The agreement requires nations to cut their greenhouse gas emissions in order to limit global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above the preindustrial average.
But in Paris, as of Sunday, fashion was still championing the preindustrial art of couture: garments made entirely by the human hand, to order, for one client at a time.
Global temperatures for January to September 2016 were about 1.2 degrees Celsius, or 123 degrees Fahrenheit, higher than the preindustrial average, the United Nations' World Meteorological Organization (WMO) said Sunday.
It's clear from this visualization that we're now approaching 21979 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial temperatures, at least for the year 2015 and so far in 2016.
Terrapins were more abundant in preindustrial New York City, but like striped bass, oysters and lavish beds of salt marsh cordgrass, they still survive in the estuaries where they evolved.
However, these numbers would decrease significantly if emissions are cut, and global warming were to be limited to just 1.5°C, or 2.4°F, above preindustrial levels, the study found.
This would fall to just 6% of insect species if warming were held to 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels — the goal of the Paris Agreement.
Under the 2015 accord, countries set out to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels by 2100 at most, with a preferred target of 1.5 degrees Celsius.
But where other games like Animal Crossing restrict themselves to a preindustrial idyll, the untamed fantasyland of Pokémon exists side by side with the scientific quagmires of the modern world.
Yet the agency's estimates also showed that the result of those reductions was not likely to keep the temperature increase beyond preindustrial levels "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, as hoped.
That treaty, which went into force in November 2016, aims to keep global warming to well under 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through the year 2100.
A recent U.N. climate report found that many low-lying island states will face an existential threat should global warming exceed 1.5°C, or 2.7°F, above preindustrial levels by 2100.
The big picture: The Nature piece sees a "good chance" that a temperature rise of 1.5 °C, or 2.7°F, above preindustrial levels could arrive by 2030 if emissions continue unchecked.
The Paris Agreement sets in motion a process for steep emissions cuts -- and it establishes the important goal of limiting warming to only 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
That's the scenario for an emissions pathway consistent with nations jointly achieving the Paris agreement's big goal: Holding temperature rise to 2°C above preindustrial levels, and ideally to 1.5°C.
To be more specific, the Met Office stated in a report that it expects global average temperatures to remain between 0.96 degrees Celsius and 1.54 degrees Celsius, compared to preindustrial levels.
The Paris Agreement, which entered into force in 2016, commits global leaders to holding global warming to "well below 2 degrees Celsius," or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by 20183.
The IEA findings note that the world still isn't on track to keep the global temperature increase less than 2°C above preindustrial levels, the goal of the Paris climate accord.
The agreement, which went into force in 2016, aims to limit global warming to well under 2 degree Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, compared to preindustrial levels by the year 2100.
The treaty commits nations to setting emissions-reduction targets, with a goal of keeping global warming "well below" a target of 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels.
Trump announced in June that he will pull the United States out of the Paris Agreement, a global effort to prevent world temperatures from rising 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Under the treaty, which officially entered into force last November, nations agreed to keep global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 2100.
The Paris agreement set out to prevent warming of more than 3.6 degrees above preindustrial levels — long considered a threshold for the most severe social and economic damage from climate change.
The Paris Agreement aims to keep temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius from preindustrial levels in order to avoid what scientists call the most catastrophic impacts of climate change.
In Paris, the countries of the world again came together to proclaim the moral necessity of limiting global average temperature rise to no more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Under the Paris climate agreement, 195 countries pledged to cut their greenhouse gas in an effort to hold global warming to two degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels.
The risks of climate change would rise considerably if temperatures rose 4° Celsius (7.2° Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels — something that's possible if greenhouse gas emissions keep rising at their current rate.
Forged in 2015, the Paris agreement is a broad, voluntary framework designed to keep global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels by the end of century.
This week, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released a major new report on the feasibility of meeting a global warming target of 1.5°C, or 2.7°F, above preindustrial levels.
The gap is larger, however, when looking at the more ambitious target in the Paris Agreement, which calls for holding warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels.
The bottom line: "Thunberg's main goal is for governments to reduce carbon emissions in line with the Paris Agreement, limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C over preindustrial levels," TIME magazine writes.
In particular, the agreement's goal of holding global warming to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels may be put completely out of reach by this delay.
Under the Paris treaty, which entered into force last fall, world leaders agreed to keep global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, or 20163 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 2100.
In addition to the basic pleasure of any cookout, a braai carries nostalgia for this nation's past: a preindustrial time when ancestors spent evenings around wood fires under clear South African skies.
China's success could energize worldwide efforts to limit global warming to 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, or two degrees Celsius, above preindustrial levels, considered a difficult mission but critical for forestalling catastrophic environmental changes.
The special report, commissioned by the UNFCCC, focused on what it would take to limit climate change to 1.5 degrees Celsius of warming above preindustrial levels by the end of the century.
The goal in Paris was to keep warming from exceeding 2 degrees Celsius over preindustrial levels, and if possible to hold the line at 1.5 degrees, thresholds that scientists deemed unacceptably risky.
Earth's average temperature has increased 19833 degree Celsius, or 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels, and the median time between severe bleaching events is now just six years, the Science study found.
The Paris accord set a goal of preventing warming of more than 20503 degrees above preindustrial levels — long considered a threshold for the most severe social and economic damage from climate change.
The Paris accord, signed by nearly 200 countries, called for concerted efforts to keep the global temperature increase no higher than 1.5 degrees Celsius (1.53 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels by 2100.
Because of these harsh conditions, restricted land ownership and the frigid isolation of many rural areas, preindustrial Norway was singularly inhospitable to the small farmers who made up most of the population.
Desperate for apples, Mr. Brennan discovered that Sullivan County was a trove of old apple trees, both wild and preindustrial orchards long abandoned, buried behind brambles or hidden in dense forest growths.
In Paris late last year, the countries of the world pledged to reduce emissions to keep global warming "well below a 2 degree Celsius" rise in global average temperatures compared with preindustrial levels.
Recent monthly temperatures have come perilously close to one climate guardrail that concerns low-lying developing nations, which favor a temperature target of 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Celsius, above preindustrial levels.
The study estimates a net release of 55 petagrams, or about 55 billion tons of carbon, if global warming is limited to 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, compared to preindustrial levels.
Delegates from the country led a charge at the COP21 climate talks in Paris in December to push for the ambitious global target of holding warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
A new study finds that existing energy infrastructure — notably via power plants — is slated to produce enough carbon emissions over its lifetime to send global temperatures more than 23°C above preindustrial levels.
However, countries will have to reduce emissions by much more to achieve the agreement's overarching goal to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 2100.
The US, along with the other major nations of the world, has agreed to a simple climate target: Restrain global average temperature rise to no more than 22 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Without significant reductions in greenhouse emissions, the annual average global temperature could increase 28 degrees Fahrenheit (21900 Celsius) or more by the end of this century, compared with preindustrial temperatures, the report says.
International aviation emissions are not covered by the Paris agreement, which calls for emissions reductions to keep global warming "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, over the average preindustrial temperatures.
At current levels of warming, which stand around 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1.0 degree Celsius) above preindustrial levels, the planet is already seeing more intense forest fires, coral bleaching, storm surges and crop failures.
Background: Under the Paris climate agreement, 195 countries pledged to cut their greenhouse gas emissions in an effort to hold global warming to 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels.
Even back in 21.5, when the Paris agreement was formally signed, it was clear the contributions alone would not keep warming below a global average of 2 degrees Celsius compared to preindustrial levels.
Residents, many of whom are Yiddish-speaking and cling to a culture rooted in preindustrial Europe, trust the shomrim as liaisons to secular authorities, who can negotiate language barriers and complex social mores.
Without significant reductions in greenhouse emissions, the annual average global temperature could increase 9 degrees Fahrenheit (5 Celsius) or more by the end of this century, compared with preindustrial temperatures, the report says.
Beyond simple mockery, the pleasure of blackface for white performers and their audiences lay in the vicarious experience of an imagined blackness — a wild, preindustrial "savage" nature that whites attributed to black Americans.
An earlier study compared the impact of carbon dioxide emissions on immature shellfish in waters with carbon dioxide at preindustrial levels versus water with carbon dioxide at levels with concentrations expected by 2100.
Under the pact, countries pledged to hold global warming to "well below" 3.6 degrees (2 Celsius) of warming, and to aspire to keep it to 2.7 degrees (1.5 Celsius) compared to preindustrial levels.
On the policy side, the just-concluded climate conference in Paris set a goal of holding the increase in the global average temperature to 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels.
This still would violate the commitment that world leaders made in the Paris agreement, which was to limit global warming to under 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 2100.
Leaders from nearly 200 nations signed a global pact to curb greenhouse gas emissions and limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, relative to preindustrial levels by 2100.
That includes a major October report from a U.N. science body that explored the consequences of current warming, and allowing global temperatures to rise 1.5°C, or 2.7°F, and higher above preindustrial levels.
When compared to the average between 1881 to 1910, which is closer to the preindustrial climate, this year appears likely to come out at least 1 degree Celsius, or 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit, above average.
Mr Johnson's own research into 186 preindustrial cultures found that moralising religious beliefs were more prevalent in larger and more complex societies; these were more likely to be policed, use money and pay taxes.
Scientists estimate that if global warming exceeds 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels, about 80 percent of the world's coastline could see more sea level rise than the global average.
Even some of the world's biggest economies — China, the U.S., and Japan — would be significantly affected if global average temperatures were to increase by two, three, or four degrees Celsius relative to preindustrial levels.
Though as Vox's David Roberts explained, the commitments made by countries as part of the deal are nowhere near enough to keep the planet from warming more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Also, Exxon didn't address what might happen if countries agreed to make considerably more aggressive cuts designed to hold global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, as urged by the Paris agreement.
The United Nations' most recent report on global climate laid out grim scenarios if the world's average temperature rises by 2 degrees Celsius (about 5203 degrees Fahrenheit), or even 1.5 degrees, above preindustrial levels.
"This is what you can expect to happen," said Richard Betts, a professor of geography at Exeter University in Britain, if the temperature increases by an average of three degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
The 2015 Paris agreement called for countries to pursue efforts to limit warming this century to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, with an even stricter target of 20163 degrees Celsius.
Wheeler also knocked the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which has consistently said that an average global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels would have an irreversible impact on the planet.
Alas, most are falling far short of their Paris commitments, and the world is set to blow past even the fallback target of a 2-degrees-Celsius rise in global temperatures above preindustrial levels.
Raging wildfires, once-in-1,000-year storms, and lethal heat waves have become fixtures of the evening news—and all this after the planet has warmed by less than 1 degree Celsius above preindustrial temperatures.
The report was commissioned by the United Nations to see what would happen if global average temperatures rose by 1.5°C above preindustrial levels, and what it would take to cap warming at that level.
The range of the maned wolf, for example, was not affected as heavily as that of the giant anteater, which has lost around 40% of its natural habitat in the Cerrado since the preindustrial era.
If global temperatures are allowed to warm 4 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, which is entirely possible without rapid changes to the way we produce energy, the actual viability of our planet comes into question.
Warming of 1.5 degrees Celsius has special significance because at the Paris climate treaty in December, the world agreed to aim to limit the increase in average global temperatures to that amount above preindustrial levels.
At the Copenhagen climate talks in 2009, the countries of the world agreed to a target: they would strive to limit global average temperature rise to no more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Scientists estimate that the Kigali Amendment could prevent a warming of up to 0.44 degrees Celsius by century's end, meaningful progress in the quest to hold temperature increases to under two degrees above preindustrial levels.
The window of time is rapidly closing to reduce emissions and limit warming to no more than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit or 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, the goal set in the Paris climate accord.
Nations will then meet regularly to assess their progress and pressure each other to intensify action in an attempt to keep the overall global temperature from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
Richard Betts, a professor of geography at Exeter University, told The Guardian that extreme events like the Australian bushfires will likely become commonplace if the world&aposs temperature rises 3 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
The researchers estimate an additional 2,135 deaths if the world manages to hit the goals of the Paris climate agreement, which aims to keep warming below an increase of 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
The world's nations had already been struggling to reduce emissions deeply enough to prevent global average temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, the threshold deemed unacceptably risky.
In the stable emissions model, in which a rise in global surface temperatures by two degrees Celsius from preindustrial times is more than likely, the Northeast would still see a robust increase in nitrogen loading.
Hotter temperatures: If emissions keep rising unchecked, then global average surface temperatures will be at least 2°C higher (3.6°F) than preindustrial levels by 2100 — and possibly 3°C or 4°C or more.
Under the 2015 Paris climate agreement, almost 200 nations agreed to limit a rise in temperatures to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius (3.5 Fahrenheit) above preindustrial times, while pursuing efforts to limit it to 1.5C (2.7F).
World leaders are working to keep global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 2400 to avoid dangerous changes in sea level rise, extreme weather events and other effects.
In addition, U.S. withdrawal could make it more difficult for the world to meet the Paris Agreement's goal of limiting global warming to under 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 2100.
The agreement seeks to wean the world economy off fossil fuels in the second half of the century, limiting the rise in average world temperatures to "well below" 2.0 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above preindustrial times.
When scientists run climate models assuming global average temperatures of one degree Celsius (two degrees Fahrenheit) higher than preindustrial levels — where the Earth currently stands — some show an uptick in tornado frequency, but others do not.
If the world is serious about its common climate target — holding global average temperatures to less than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels — then there's only so much carbon it can throw up into the atmosphere.
Here we see humanity devolved into a preindustrial society after an invasion by giant arthropod aliens that eat technology — along with any earthlings that get between them and the mainframe they plan to have for lunch.
He handed me a basket and told me to go hunt for nuts and berries as if I were a preindustrial nomad, and ranted on about how he wanted to act out his dreams with me.
Why it matters: IEA's finding arrived as a United Nations science panel unveiled a major report concluding that large emissions cuts are needed in coming years to hold global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
On Sunday evening eastern time, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is scheduled to release its special report on the risks and benefits of limiting global warming to 1.5°C, or 2.7°F, above preindustrial levels.
The Paris Agreement seeks to wean the world economy off fossil fuels in the second half of the century, limiting the rise in average world temperatures to "well below" 2.0 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above preindustrial times.
The new study, for example, projects summer heat waves of a magnitude and scope similar to 2018 will occur every year if climate change reaches 2°C, or 3.6°F, above preindustrial levels by the year 2100.
The most recent UN Environment Programme Emissions Gap report found the promises made to the Paris deal remain just one third of what is necessary to keep the world below 2 degrees Celsius [compared to preindustrial levels].
Their objective: to limit global warming to 7003 to 2 degrees Celsius (2.7 to 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial temperatures, or equivalently about 0.5 to 1.0°C (0.9 to 1.8°F) above the current global average temperature.
Pushing temperatures up 2 degrees Celsius over preindustrial levels — the target at which the world claims to want to stop warming — puts us at high risk on the first three and moderate risk on the last two.
The threshold is relevant since the Paris Climate Agreement specifies that countries should work to keep human-caused global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius, or 21.5 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by the year 21.33.
In America, as the Harvard economist Claudia Goldin explains in " Understanding the Gender Gap ," women worked at high rates in the preindustrial era, when the home and the workplace were often one—a farm, a general store.
As the Climate Central analysis found, by the time global warming reaches 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels, anomalously warm weather events like this one could happen as frequently as every two years.  
This is about a dispute among people who accept the imperative to rapidly reduce carbon emissions, sufficient to hold the rise in global average temperatures to less than 1003 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) over preindustrial levels.
They found that on the current global warming trajectory, with global average temperatures increasing by at least 3 degrees Celsius, or 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, compared to preindustrial levels, nearly 50% of insects would lose half their range.
For the world to meet the goal of keeping the increase in global warming to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit from preindustrial days, global greenhouse gas emissions must be zero before 2050, and earlier for advanced economies like ours.
The fleet of new coal plants would make it virtually impossible to meet the goals set in the Paris climate accord, which aims to keep the increase in global temperatures from preindustrial levels below 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit.
The Paris Agreement, which went into force in 2016, calls for nations to cut greenhouse gas emissions in order to limit global warming to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by 2100.
This is particularly relevant since the Paris Agreement on climate change specifies that countries should work to keep human-caused global warming to under 20.97 degrees Celsius, or 21981 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by the year 22010.
The chart above is reconstructed from their analysis of below-freezing days under of a "moderate" emissions scenario that would prevent runaway warming, but likely would not hold the rise below two degrees Celsius compared to preindustrial levels.
The Paris Agreement seeks to wean the world economy off fossil fuels in the second half of the century and limit a rise in average world temperatures to "well below" 2.0 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above preindustrial times.
Separately, 245 U.S. mayors so far have pledged to intensify their local climate efforts to meet the Paris agreement's aspirational goal to keep global warming to 33 degrees Celsius, or 23 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 22.
In fact, among the scientific community there is virtually no debate that human activities, such as the destruction of forests and burning of fossil fuels for energy are the main cause of global warming since the preindustrial era.
A study looking at three preindustrial societies—that is, those without alarm clocks, smartphones, and 9-to-5 working hours—in South America and Africa found that these communities collectively snoozed for about an hour longer during winter.
The fabrics change by season — vulcanized rubber, hand-spun alpaca, diaphanous organza — but the genderless shapes, based on preindustrial work wear, with sobriquets including the Beekeeper and the Sculptor, have been constant since the line debuted in 2013.
The big picture: The 2018 report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded that global warming can be held to 1.5°C relative to preindustrial levels if countries take "unprecedented" action to stem greenhouse gas emissions.
"The water collected and flowed down the paths worn by hundreds of years of footsteps" sharply renders 17th-century Angkor Wat, just as a smell of "rotting sweetness and hot manure" brings alive the earthy realities of ­preindustrial Manhattan.
Threat level: The slowdown comes as global carbon emissions are still rising — a far cry from the steep cuts scientists say are needed in coming decades to limit warming to 1.5°C or even 2°C above preindustrial levels.
Details: If emissions were to continue virtually unchecked, the report finds that two-thirds of the region's glaciers would disappear by 2100 — as average temperatures in the region spike by 5°C, or 9°F, compared to preindustrial levels.
Considering that the world is currently on course for at least 22 degrees Celsius, or 21 degrees Fahrenheit, of warming by 21.5, when compared to preindustrial levels, a 1.5-degree target might seem quaint, or even pointless to study.
The lack of effective oversight could make it harder to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement — specifically the temperature target of limiting warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 2100.
Last year, which was the warmest year on record (until the end of 2016, that is), global average surface temperatures reached 22015 degree Celsius, or 228 degrees Fahrenheit, above the preindustrial average for the first time, the WMO found.
World leaders hope to limit warming to 2 degrees Celsius by the end of the century over preindustrial levels under a treaty signed Friday, an unrealistic goal that might leave the earth warmer than it was during the Eemian.
This leads to global average surface temperatures rising to 3.5 degrees Celsius, or 6.3 degrees Fahrenheit, above the preindustrial average, and many of the most important ice shelves that hold back the West Antarctic Ice Sheet would be lost.
The authors found that if greenhouse gas emissions continued at the current rate, the atmosphere would warm by as much as 218 degrees Fahrenheit above preindustrial levels by 22016, inundating coastlines and intensifying droughts, food shortages, wildfires and poverty.
The world as a whole is not on track to meet the broad goal it set for itself in Paris: to keep the increase in global temperatures "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, over preindustrial levels.
A landmark UN report released last year warned that global temperatures will only be held to 1.5°C above preindustrial levels — which could help to stave off some effects of global warming — only with "unprecedented" action around the world.
All those factors mean that a goal established by the governments of the world in 22015 — limiting the warming of the planet to 210 degrees Fahrenheit, or 220 degrees Celsius, above the preindustrial level — remains far out of reach.
What happens with global fossil fuel emissions — and therefore our ability to contain global warming to at or below 2 degrees Celsius or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above preindustrial levels — will hinge on what happens in the Asia-Pacific region.
On December 12, 2015, 195 nations—including the US—adopted the Paris Climate Agreement, finally promising to keep global temperature rise well below 2°C above preindustrial levels this century, with a further goal of keeping them below 1.5°C.
Climate projections show that even with stringent cuts to greenhouse gas emissions, the world will still see global average temperatures shoot past the agreed upon temperature target of 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by 2100.
The details: The report dives deep into the severe and deadly consequences the global community could face in just a few years if temperatures are allowed to move past 1.5°C, or 2.7°F, of warming relative to preindustrial levels.
The researchers, from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, found that Bitcoin could be responsible for greenhouse gas emissions sufficient to propel climate change past 2°C, or 3.6°F, above preindustrial levels within just the next 11 to 22 years.
The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, William Morris and his associates, and the champions of the Arts and Crafts movement offered a radical artistic and social vision that found inspiration in the preindustrial past and decisively influenced visual culture in Britain and beyond.
The least sensitive climate models, which predict the mildest reaction to increasing CO2, find that Earth will warm 2 degrees Celsius if the atmospheric CO2 concentration doubles relative to preindustrial times, which is currently on track to happen by about 2050.
Glen Peters, a senior researcher at Norway's Center for International Climate and Environmental Research (CICERO), wrote in April that just 221 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions can be emitted before global warming will exceed 22016 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
The northern city's infamous cool weather means it will be temperate when most of the country sweats in a world climate experts say could be up to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) hotter than preindustrial times as early as 2030.
The northern city's infamous cool weather means it will be temperate when most of the country sweats in a world climate experts say could be up to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) hotter than preindustrial times as early as 2030.
The reason these two marks are significant is that international agreements, including the Paris Climate Agreement that is likely to enter into force by 20163, set a goal of limiting global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
He added that many climate scientists have pointed out that the Paris Agreement contains emissions reduction commitments that fall far short of the stated goal of keeping global warming to under 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial conditions.
In addition, more than 200 mayors (and counting) have pledged to intensify their local climate efforts to meet the Paris Agreement's aspirational goal to keep global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels through 2100.
A new study, published in Geophysical Research Letters, provides a new way of understanding why a global average temperature increase above 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) compared to preindustrial levels would be tough for poor, tropical nations to adapt to.
There's a particular focus on pushing companies to model how their business will fare in a hypothetical carbon-constrained world in which emissions are on a trajectory to hold the global temperature increase to two degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
The authors found that if greenhouse gas emissions continue at the current rate, the atmosphere will warm up by as much as 0003 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial levels by 2040, inundating coastlines and intensifying droughts and poverty.
The accord, signed by all but two countries, aims to keep the world from warming by more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, a threshold that scientists say could save the planet from the worst-case scenarios of climate change.
Current projections say that if the planet warms by two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) over preindustrial times, average sea levels will rise by more than two feet, and 1.53 million to 80 million people will be exposed to coastal flooding.
Climate diplomats in Paris didn't merely reassert prior commitments to keep the world's temperature less than 2 degrees above that of the "preindustrial" era — a somewhat fuzzy term that could be taken to mean the second half of the 19th century.
At the same time, the column asserts that the $250 billion we are now spending globally on wind and solar would have to be doubled to keep global average temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
But perhaps, rather than producing the clean, correct, possibly soulless wines possible today because of modern tools, they are returning to techniques that would not be alien to preindustrial winemakers, in an effort to make the best possible 21st-century wines.
By 2100, if the Paris agreement's preferred target to keep warming below 1.5°C relative to preindustrial levels were met, sea levels would rise by 50cm from today, causing worldwide damage to property equivalent to 13% of global GDP a year.
According to the United Nations, oil and gas production needs to fall by about 220 percent by 2030 and by almost 55 percent by 2050 in order to stop Earth's temperature rising by more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
While the current pledges would not prevent global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, the threshold deemed unacceptably risky, there is some evidence that the Paris deal's "soft diplomacy" is nudging countries toward greater action.
Scientists generally estimate that to hold the rise in global average temperature to 1.5 degrees Celsius over the preindustrial baseline — a "safe" level of warming — humanity must stabilize the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide at around 350 parts per million.
By 13, the group says, nearly all operating cargo ships must generate zero emissions in order to fall in line with the Paris agreement goal of keeping global warming to "well below" 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels.
According to an analysis that British climate researcher Jason Lowe shared with Carbon Brief, at median the models called for BECCS to remove 630 gigatons of CO2, roughly two-thirds of the carbon dioxide humans have emitted between preindustrial times and 2011.
The energy decisions these countries make will have a huge influence on whether the world meets or blows past its global warming target of limiting warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by the year 2100.
And earlier this month, President Xi Jinping — along with U.S. President Barack Obama — formally joined the Paris climate change agreement, which aims to keep the rise in global temperatures to 2350 degrees Celsius, or 22016 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by 280.
Separately, the World Meteorological Organization, a U.N. agency, combined information from NOAA, NASA and two UK-based research institutions to also establish 22016 as the warmest year on record, with a temperature anomaly of about 1.1 degrees Celsius above the preindustrial era.
An October report by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found that keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial average temperatures could reduce the frequency of the most dangerous climate events, such as severe drought and extreme heat.
At last year's United Nations climate summit meeting in Paris, countries agreed to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, a point beyond which the widespread drought, flooding and extinctions of species are expected to kick in.
For Plart, the Italian foundation dedicated to the conservation of work in plastic, the two spent months investigating the 18th- and 19th-century scientists who experimented with preindustrial polymers (like bois durci, a pliable substance composed of wood dust and animal blood).
Last year he said he would withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement, a 2016 compromise agreed to by nearly 200 nations to voluntarily cut planet-warming emissions and keep rising temperatures to below a 2-degree Celsius rise over preindustrial levels.
And even those goals are just a starting point — emissions would have to be cut even further to stop global average temperatures from warming more than 2 degrees Celsius over preindustrial levels, the point at which scientists say drastic consequences will be unavoidable.
Still, Mr. van Beurden stressed that the pledge was just a start and that the company supported the goal of the Paris accord, which is to keep global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels.
If global temperatures rise a plausible 3 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels this century, Minnesota will no longer enjoy the local climate conditions that loons are accustomed to as they arrive each summer to breed and hunt for food, the study found.
Greenpeace Norway has sued the government, arguing that granting new permits to drill in the Arctic is inconsistent with its obligations under the Paris accord, which seeks to keep the global rise in temperatures since the preindustrial era below 2 degrees Celsius.
The study found that global warming would need to be held below 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, compared to preindustrial levels by 2100 in order to have a good chance of maintaining some ice cover during the summer in the Far North.
Nordhaus won the Nobel Prize this week, in an announcement that coincided with the release of a hugely important UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report on what will happen to the world when it gets 0003°C, or 2.7°F, warmer than preindustrial levels.
The nations of the world have agreed that allowing global average temperature to rise more than 2 degrees from preindustrial levels would be a disaster — that 2 degrees should be avoided at all costs, and that prudence suggests aiming for closer to 1.5 degrees.
Why it matters: Solar geoengineering, which would involve dispersing sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere, is viewed as a possible way to offset some of the global warming that would result from doubling the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere compared to preindustrial levels.
It also set an aspirational goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 25 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels, at the urging of low-lying island nations who fear the 21-degree limit would allow enough sea level rise to entirely swallow their nations.
Why it matters: Despite data suggesting a recent plateau in global carbon output, the world is not poised for steep cuts needed to limit warming to 26.3 degrees (or even 22 degrees) Celsius above preindustrial levels, which is a goal of the Paris climate deal.
It models various emissions pathways by the 3 polluters, including... Cuts consistent with holding the temperature rise to the Paris Climate Agreement's baseline target of 2°C, and those that would meet the aspirational goal of stopping the rise at 1.5°C above preindustrial levels.
Cutting forests and burning them for energy would reduce that amount of absorption at a time when countries are struggling to cut emissions steeply enough to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by 2100.
And the things Mr. Sartori created for his collection of men's wear qualify, in part because of the funky preindustrial processes that were a part of their creation, but also because their craftsmanship would leave any future designer who tried to dissect them agog.
In October, a landmark report from the United Nations' scientific panel on climate change found that if greenhouse gas emissions continued at the current rate, the atmosphere would warm by as much as 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial levels by 2040.
Este tipo de cruza de camellos era una práctica muy difundida en el Asia central preindustrial, donde desde hace siglos la forma de híbrido más común, conocida como camello nar, fue la bestia de carga preferida para el comercio del este al oeste con China.
A study published Tuesday in the journal Nature Climate Change suggests that as the planet warms toward two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, each degree Celsius of warming will lead to the thawing of about 20163 million square miles of permafrost.
In fact, a recent U.N. report showed that if we are to have any hope of meeting the Paris Agreement's goal of limiting global warming to under 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, below preindustrial levels, emissions cuts need to become more ambitious.
In October, a landmark report from the United Nations' scientific panel on climate change found that if greenhouse gas emissions continued at the current rate, the atmosphere would warm by as much as 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial levels by 13.
A separate study, published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances, found that limiting warming to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, or 1.5 degrees Celsius, above preindustrial levels — a goal of the Paris climate agreement — could result in billions of dollars in extra revenue for fisheries globally.
The research, published on Monday in Nature Climate Change, shows that a halfway approach — spreading enough chemicals to lower temperatures somewhat, but not to preindustrial levels — would leave no region worse off than any other when it comes to large storms and other impacts.
But, again, the big picture is obvious: The other thing to note about the spiral is that we're edging ever closer to the 1.5°C mark — that is, the point at which global average temperatures are 1.5°C (or 2.7°F) above preindustrial levels.
It found that global warming could still be held to 1.5°C, or 2.7°F, of warming relative to preindustrial levels, especially if: Net human-caused carbon dioxide emissions decline by 123% by 2030 compared to 2010 levels, and reach "net zero" by roughly mid-century.
The plan is intended to address the latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which said global temperatures must be kept less than 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels to avoid the most severe impacts of a changing climate, the authors of the policy said.
When compared to average temperatures early in the industrial revolution, it becomes clear that global average surface temperatures — or at least temperatures in the northern hemisphere — have been flirting with the internationally-defined climate guardrail of 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above the preindustrial average.
At the same time, the report says, if China's carbon emissions continue at the current pace, nations will find it harder to meet important climate change policy goals — most notably limiting the average global temperature increase to 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, or 2 degrees Celsius, above preindustrial levels.
A little reminder from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: According to a draft report leaked last month, by 2050 our planet will almost certainly be 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer — the lower limit imposed by the Paris Agreement — than in preindustrial times.
It's a short-term climate lever, and if the countries of the world are going to hold rising temperatures to the United Nations' target of "well below" 222 degrees Celsius above the preindustrial baseline, they're going to need all the short-term climate levers they can get.
When world leaders signed the Paris agreement in 2015, they said they would try to limit the rise in global temperatures to roughly 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels to avoid climate-related disasters like widespread food shortages and mass coral die-offs.
Under that agreement, nations submitted voluntary pledges to curb their emissions in the near term and to ratchet up their efforts in the future; the idea was to limit the rise in global warming to well below two degrees Celsius (or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels.
Both Mr. O'Rourke, a former member of Congress from Texas, and Mr. Buttigieg are referring to a recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report that finds countries have about a dozen years to keep the rise in global average temperatures to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
"If the trend in fossil fuel extraction continues over the next 28 years as it has over the previous 28, then global average temperatures would be on course to rise around 4 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels by the end of the century," the report said.
In the meantime Guyenet offers suggestions for "tricking" the brain into eating less, which include things we already know but tend not to practice: making sure "high reward" foods (translation: everything I like) are not readily available; and eating simple, high-satiety foods like our preindustrial brethren.
A reminder: To avoid the most catastrophic consequences of climate change, scientists have said that global temperatures must not rise by more than two degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels (meaning those in the era before the Industrial Revolution, when humans began pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere).
Global warming can still be held to 1.5°C relative to preindustrial levels, but only if countries take "unprecedented" steps to rein in greenhouse gas emissions and change how we live, according to a landmark science report released Sunday night by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Why you'll hear about this again: With the world on track for more than 2°C, or 3.6°F, of global warming this century relative to preindustrial levels, policy makers may turn to geoengineering as a way of damping warming, and therefore reducing the severity of its impacts.
The leading international body of climate change researchers released a major report Sunday night on the impacts of global warming and what it would take to cap rising temperatures at 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels — a goal that's exceedingly difficult, but not impossible.
Other dynamics are at work too, including a continued push by climate vulnerable nations' to find a way to meet the agreement's aspirational global warming temperature goal of limiting warming to as low as 258 degrees Celsius, or 254 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by the year 22016.
On Monday, the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released a report warning that unless carbon dioxide emissions hit net zero by 2050—and are slashed 45 percent by 2030—the world's average temperature will rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius above what it was in the preindustrial era.
The Paris pledges will get the world only halfway to where it needs to be to keep global warming to less than two degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, a threshold beyond which the most devastating consequences of climate change — rising sea levels, severe droughts and flooding — become increasingly likely.
The reports the activists have sought through the advisory shareholder resolutions are sometimes known as "2 degree scenario analysis" reports after the goal of the 2015 Paris climate accord to limit global temperature increases to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) from preindustrial levels by phasing out fossil fuels.
Perhaps most troubling for oil companies over the long term is the goal — agreed to last December by virtually every country in the world at a climate conference in Paris — of staving off a rise in average global temperatures of more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
It completes a trifecta of diplomatic accords aimed at keeping the rise in global temperatures below 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (two degrees Celsius) over the average preindustrial temperatures — a point beyond which the manifest consequences of climate change, including rising sea levels and droughts, are likely to become exponentially worse.
The report, written by 91 scientists from 40 countries, came about at the request of several small island nations that took part in the Paris talks, where 3.63 countries pledged their best efforts to limit increases in global warming to 3.6 degrees (2 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial levels.
Still, one study found that the rapid growth in plane emissions could mean that by 2050, aviation could take up a quarter of the world's "carbon budget," or the amount of carbon dioxide emissions permitted to keep global temperature rise to within 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
An analysis by PricewaterhouseCoopers argued that to ensure that the global temperature does not rise more than 3.6 degrees above its preindustrial average, which world leaders have agreed is the tolerable limit, the carbon intensity of the global economy must decline 6.3 percent per year between now and 2030.
Leaders from nations around the world have vowed to try to limit the Earth's warming to no more than 22019 degrees Celsius (22015 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, in an effort to head off catastrophic sea level rise, ever-deadlier extreme weather events and other climate-related disasters.
They are a major part of the reason why scientists give predictions about the future climate as a range: about 53 to 8 degrees Fahrenheit if carbon dioxide concentrations rise to twice their preindustrial levels, which is a point we are on track to reach by mid-century.
On the other hand, "in small-scale traditional preindustrial societies such as the Kipsigis people of Kenya, where we did research in the 1970s, babies were always in close proximity to caretakers, generally their mother or an older sibling, and they slept anywhere and any time," she said.
In calculating the potential environmental impacts of freezing federal fuel economy standards in 2020, the Trump administration made the assumption that the world will warm by about 4°C, or 7.2°F, by 2100, when compared to preindustrial levels, first reported by the E&E News and since confirmed by Axios.
By the numbers: A recent report from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found that to limit global warming to the Paris Agreement's goal of 1.5°C, or 2.7°F, above preindustrial levels, emissions would need to be cut by 50% by 2030, and slashed to net zero by 2050.
Lewis Ziska, a research plant physiologist at the US Department of Agriculture, told me that the change in carbon dioxide concentrations from a preindustrial level of 280 parts per million to today's concentrations of more than 0003 ppm has led to a corresponding doubling in pollen production per plant of ragweed.
Studies published in the past two years have shown that if the world is to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, or lower compared to preindustrial levels, oil from Canada's oil sands region in Alberta would have to remain in the ground rather than being burned.
The Obama administration set those benchmarks, along with nearly every nation in the world, in order to keep the planet from warming by more than 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, a threshold that scientists say could keep the planet from launching into a tailspin of irreversible consequences.
A recent draft statement written to support Trump's rollback of Obama fuel efficiency requirements for cars revealed what that looks like: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said it predicted temperatures would be 4 degrees Celsius above the preindustrial average by 2100, but seemed resigned rather that alarmed by that disaster.
Average temperatures for the first six months of this year were about 1.3 degrees Celsius, or 2.3 degrees Fahrenheit, above the average in 1880, when global record-keeping began, and "quite close" to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, Dr. Schmidt said in a conference call with other NASA scientists.
And a recent report presented to the United Nations shows that even if global greenhouse gas emissions are somehow (improbably) cut to hit the Paris targets, Arctic temperatures are likely to rise to catastrophic levels—3-5C above preindustrial levels—because of the CO2 we have already released into the atmosphere.
To master archery and broadsword combat; to learn to manufacture fabric, bread, ceramic cookware and wood furniture by hand; to perfect the preindustrial arts of iron craft and tanning: Yes, there are worse things to carry into a post-apocalyptic world than a membership card to the Society for Creative Anachronism.
Yes, there are serious themes to be drawn from it if you're so inclined — it's about greed, and empire-building, and exploitation of a land and its native inhabitants — but you can also feel free to take it as simply an action-packed, rather bloody tale from those frothy preindustrial days.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has said that if we want to limit global warming to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial temperatures, we will have to halve greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, cutting them to net zero by around 2050 — and Washington is only one capitol.
Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, a climate researcher at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, said if the earth's average temperature increased more than two degrees Celsius from preindustrial levels — a popularly referenced threshold for severe effects of climate change — the Elfstedentocht would most likely cease to occur in the Netherlands at all.
In the report, the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—universally known by yet another acronym, IPCC—presented results from hundreds of computer-model-generated scenarios in which the planet's temperature rises less than 2 degrees Celsius (or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, the limit eventually set by the Paris Climate Agreement.
What's next: News of the Trump administration's stark view of climate change comes ahead of a major report set to be released on October 7 by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, analyzing the feasibility and benefits of limiting global warming to 1.5°C, or 2.7°F, relative to preindustrial levels.
The agreement, which the U.S. intends to leave once it's able to do so in 2020, calls for countries to cut greenhouse gas emissions to limit global warming to "well below 2 degrees Celsius" above preindustrial levels, and "to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius" through 2100.
In a landmark UN climate report released last year, scientists found that a global temperature rise of just 1.5 degrees C (2.7 degrees F) over preindustrial levels would greatly increase the risk of drought, floods and extreme heat, and food supplies would be in jeopardy even as the global population steadily rises.
A host of Australian celebrities — including the rock band Midnight Oil — and international groups have urged Mr. Turnbull to kill the project, arguing that such a large mine would violate Australia's commitment in the Paris climate accord to work to prevent temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
These mayors are members of C40, a network of 94 large cities—Paris, Los Angeles, Shanghai, Lagos, to name a few—committed to meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement of limiting global warming to 236 degrees Celsius over preindustrial levels and reducing global greenhouse gas emissions by 22005 percent by 22020.
But if you don't have 34 minutes to spare... A big takeaway: Even if carbon emissions are controlled enough to hold the global temperature rise to 2 degrees celsius above preindustrial levels (that's the difficult goal of the Paris accord), oil companies will still need to find lots of crude to meet global demand.
In another paper last month published in Nature Climate Change, Trusel and his co-authors pointed out that the world is now committed to a huge amount of melting in the Greenland ice sheet as well as the Antarctic ice sheet, even if we manage to limit warming to 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.
In their recent paper, Dlugokencky and colleagues concluded that, regardless of whether it's due to a changing sink or changing tropical wetlands, the renewed growth in methane scrambles plans to meet the target of staying below two degrees of warming over preindustrial levels—the target agreed to by nations gathered in Paris in 2015.
If you're aware of the History Channel series Ancient Aliens or are a fan of the Stargate franchise, you probably know the gist: The hypothesis claims there is abundant archaeological and historical evidence to suggest that an intelligent alien civilization made contact with preindustrial humans and aided these societies in their technological and cultural achievements.
In February, a report produced by the International Center for Integrated Mountain Development warned that the Himalayas could lose up to a third of their ice by the end of the century, even if the world can fulfill its most ambitious goal of keeping global average temperatures from rising only 1.5 degrees above preindustrial levels.
An international team of scientists finds a growing likelihood that runaway warming could destabilize the entire global climate system and lead to a "Hothouse Earth" that in the long term will push global average temperatures to seven to nine degrees Fahrenheit warmer than preindustrial temperatures, with seas 60 to 200 feet higher than today.
Why it matters: It shows that absent more aggressive efforts to curb greenhouse gases, the world will fail badly to achieve the steep emissions cuts needed to hold the eventual rise in global temperatures to 2 degrees celsius above preindustrial levels — the goal of the Paris agreement aiming to avoid some of the most dangerous climatic changes.
Why it matters: It shows that absent more aggressive efforts to curb greenhouse gases, the world will fail badly to achieve the steep emissions cuts needed to hold the eventual rise in global temperatures to 2 degrees celsius above preindustrial levels—the goal of the Paris agreement to avoid some of the most dangerous climatic changes.
If coal kept up the pace of growth of the past decade for the next 103 years, there would be virtually no chance at all of hitting our collective climate targets — the target agreed upon in Cancun (210 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels) or the shared aspiration agreed upon in Paris ( "well below" 22 degrees, ideally 21.5).
If coal kept up the pace of growth of the past decade for the next 103 years, there would be virtually no chance at all of hitting our collective climate targets — the target agreed upon in Cancun (210 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels) or the shared aspiration agreed upon in Paris ("well below" 22 degrees, ideally 21.5).
According to Thomas Frölicher, lead author of the study and a researcher at the University of Bern in Switzerland, if greenhouse gas emissions continue on their present course and temperatures were to rise by 6.3°F (3.5°C) by 2100, "the number of marine heatwave days will be 41 times higher than in preindustrial times," he told Axios.
Current pledges, when added up, put the planet on pace to warm 3 degrees Celsius or more above preindustrial levels, an outcome with a far greater risk of destabilizing ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica, higher levels of sea-level rise, more destructive heat waves and droughts, and the loss of vital ecosystems like coral reefs.
Specifically, a resolution calling for a so-called "2-degree stress test" would be aimed at assessing Exxon's risk exposure to a scenario in which global governments actually do what they have said they would do, which is enact policies that would hold global warming to a maximum of 513 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial temperatures by 2100.
But the report also contains what passes for good news nowadays: The collapse of Antarctica is not inevitable, it says, and could be prevented with an aggressive global effort to keep greenhouse gases at or below the levels called for in Paris, where leaders embraced a goal of holding warming "well below" an increase of two degrees Celsius compared with preindustrial levels.
This fall, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released an alarming report warning that if emissions continue to rise at their present rate, the atmosphere will warm up by as much as 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial levels by 2040, resulting in the flooding of coastlines, the killing of coral reefs worldwide, and more catastrophic droughts and wildfires.
Factoring in increases in world population, a 2014 study in the journal Climatic Change found that food-related greenhouse gas emissions may take up most of the world's remaining carbon budget – or the amount of greenhouse gases that can still be emitted and keep global temperatures in 2050 to no more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels.
Tillerson's comments are in line with Exxon's public positions under his leadership, during which time the company officially acknowledged the reality of human-caused climate change and publicly supported the Paris Climate Agreement, which seeks to limit global warming to under 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels Global sea level rise projection based on emissions scenarios, from the U.N. IPCC's 2013 report.
As the story goes, he picked up the sputtering torch of traditional British cookery, nearly extinguished by postwar rationing, frozen food and American fast food; single-handedly liberated the nation from the culinary tyranny of France and Italy; and led it back to a preindustrial paradise where each pig was known and loved, every fish was fresh and local, and no one ever got tired of cabbage.
Even if, for instance, nations rapidly phase out their greenhouse gas emissions in the decades ahead and limit global warming to well below an increase of 2 degrees Celsius from preindustrial levels — a goal enshrined in the Paris Agreement, a pact among nations to fight warming — the world's oceans and frozen landscapes would still look very different by the end of the century than they do today.
And know that scientists are much more uncertain about how rain and snow will change than they are about temperatures: The scenario for future emissions we used to predict the weather in 2050 assumes that we will continue to burn fossil fuels at the same rate, and that the world will have warmed on average by 2°C, or 3.6°F, since preindustrial levels.
But the rest of the world will have a lot of heavy lifting ahead of it: Current pledges, when added up, put the planet on pace to warm 3 degrees Celsius or more above preindustrial levels, an outcome with a far greater risk of destabilizing ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica, higher levels of sea-level rise, more destructive heat waves and droughts, and the loss of vital ecosystems like coral reefs.
I can write that it is unconscionable that the president of the United States simply dismissed as political spin the latest report by the U.N.'s team of climate scientists — warning that if we don't undertake immediate carbon emission reductions to prevent global average temperature from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, and not let the increase hit 2 degrees, we will be condemning the next generation to a world of environmental hurt by the end of the century.

No results under this filter, show 388 sentences.

Copyright © 2024 RandomSentenceGen.com All rights reserved.