He spent 48 hours here at my house on the way to a trip to Asia, and I showed him the page proofs — we spent about 30 minutes going through the page proofs of "GMEU" together — and he loved the ratios.
|
|
"This is where I have the art and page proofs from each book," he said.
|
|
The story ends in bloody revolt and the assassination of the fictional author before he can review his page proofs.
|
|
Some page proofs of the book found their way beneath the eyes of the textbook division's editors, and things seemed to click naturally from there.
|
|
This exhibition includes 163 of his preparatory works, along with page proofs and text celebrating the enchanted car, which didn't just drive — it flew and floated, too.
|
|
Back upstairs we entered a high-ceilinged, near-empty room, where the page proofs of one of the designer's upcoming books, a career survey, were laid on the ground.
|
|
Cuarón had been up until 2 the night before, preparing "Roma" for Mexico's Morelia film festival and going through page proofs of a companion book of photographs published by Assouline.
|
|
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt is also a textbook publishing giant, and editors in that division happened to see page proofs of "Thing Explainer," which attempts to explain concepts like tectonic plates, cells and nuclear bombs using just the thousand most common words in English.
|
|
Thus any editor, "of genius" or otherwise, had to work on his list as a whole, shuttling between a wide range of projects in different stages of development: marking up page proofs, cajoling authors, reading stacks of manuscripts and letters of introduction, and occasionally making offers that could change a life.
|
|
In a compilation of catches made by the sports copy desk, John Oudens saluted his colleague Jason Bailey for spotting four errors in a single month while reviewing print page proofs between deadlines: Miomir Kecmnovic (it is Kecmanovic), Maya Dirado (it is DiRado), Kody Puderbaugh (it is Kory) and Jonathan Hankins (it is Johnathan).
|
|
He was an eminent Greek and Hebrew scholar, and proficient in sacred literature. Noyes died in Cambridge, Massachusetts, a few days after correcting the final page proofs for his New Testament translation.
|
|
Additionally, because final page proofs contain the final pagination, if an index was not compiled at an earlier stage in production, this pagination facilitates compiling a book's index and correcting its table of contents.
|
|
They burned them the next day. Joyce managed to save one copy, which he obtained "by ruse". He then returned to submitting the manuscript to other publishers, and in 1914 Grant Richards once again agreed to publish the book, using the page proofs saved from Maunsel as copy.Jeri Johnson, "Composition and Publication History", in James Joyce, Dubliners (Oxford University Press, 2000).
|
|
After the War, Zylbercweig picked up his work again. In 1959 the third volume appeared, followed by three more volumes in 1963, 1967, and 1969. When Zylbercweig died in 1972, a final seventh volume was in page proofs awaiting publication, but no funding was in place for the printing. Copies of these proofs are held at YIVO and Hebrew University.
|
|
In the fall of 1912 he revised the page proofs to include more material on the Cubist painters, adding the subtitle, Les Peintres Cubistes. When the book went to press, the original title was enclosed in brackets and reduced in size, while the subtitle Les Peintres Cubistes was enlarged, dominating the cover. Yet Les Peintres Cubistes appears only on the half t.p. and t.p.
|
|
Fullmer was the author of Sir Humphry Davy's Published Works, published in 1969-70 by Harvard University Press and Oxford University Press. At the time of her death, which occurred on January 31, 2000, she was completing her multi-volume biography of Sir Humphry Davy, being published by the American Philosophical Society. Page proofs for the first volume, Young Humphry Davy: The Making of an Experimental Chemist, arrived just after she died.
|
|
The Journal of Philosophy. 44: 721–723 – via Jstor. According to Friedrich Melchior Grimm, writing in 1777, "The entire extent of the injury done by this unexampled, murderous, and infamous depredation will never be known, since the perpetrators of the crime burned the manuscript as soon as it was printed and left the evil without remedy." This claim has proved not to be true for, unknown to Grimm, le Breton had kept copies of the page proofs.
|
|
The manuscript was submitted in late 1964. The page proofs, which arrived in 1965, had so many mistakes and required so many alterations that the publishers, Sweet & Maxwell, made the authors pay for a second set of proofs. As a result, Goff and Jones made practically no money from the first edition of the book, and Goff complained that Sweet & Maxwell "appeared to understand nothing about writing pioneering books". The book was finally published in 1966.
|
|
The first trial was conducted in New York in 1947. During a nine-month trial in New York's federal Foley Square Courthouse, Jerome passed the long hours in court writing poetry and reading page proofs of his memoir, A Lantern for Jeremy. He was convicted and sentenced in 1953 to three years at Lewisburg Penitentiary, which he served between 1955 and 1957. Shortly before going to prison, he resigned from Political Affairs, complaining that the Party made decisions without him.
|
|
In the fall of 2003 The University Register moved its prepress production to an entirely digital process, by sending PDF documents electronically to its printing company. Previously, the page proofs were printed on oversized paper and driven to the printer, where the proofs were converted into plates for printing. In the fall of 2007, The University Register switched from the compact format to broadsheet. During the 2009-2010 academic school year, the University Register ran out of funds and briefly ceased publication.
|
|
The book publication took much longer than either Goff or Jones anticipated. The manuscript was submitted in late 1964. The page proofs, which arrived in 1965, had so many mistakes and required so many alterations that the publishers, Sweet & Maxwell, made the authors pay for a second set of proofs. As a result, Goff and Jones made practically no money from the first edition of the book, and Goff complained that Sweet & Maxwell "appeared to understand nothing about writing pioneering books".
|
|
They further argued there was a likely "non-paranoid" explanation for the missing part of the page. But as it was pointed out by Todorov and by Logunov, Mestvirishvili, and Petrov, even in his mutilated form, the page proofs of Hilbert contain the correct Lagrange density of the gravitational field, which in conjunction with Hilbert action results in the correct gravitational field equations. To derive the gravitational field equations from his action was not more than a minor exercise for Hilbert. Therefore, the game was over with Hilbert's action.
|
|
When the collection was broken up, many of the contents were transferred to the Melville Society.“The Many ‘Rooms’ of Herman Melville – Analog Beginnings to the Digital Present” Robert Allen Sandberg, (21 December 2012) Establishing a reliable text was not simple. The first printing of a book might not represent the author's intentions: Melville's handwriting was cramped, misreadings and typographical errors were common, and Melville was impatient with proofreading. In addition, publishers censored or cut many of his early books and Melville made changes and corrections on the page proofs or inserted new material.
|
|
For that school year, the board supplied $4,668 in printing costs, and Howard Emerson, the adviser to the journalism class, submitted page proofs of the May 13 issue of the newspaper to principal Robert Eugene Reynolds for approval, a practice that was customary at the time. Reynolds objected to two of the stories scheduled to run. One was about teen pregnancy, containing interviews with three students who had been pregnant. The story used false names to keep the girls' identities a secret, but Reynolds was concerned that the students would still be identifiable from the text.
|
|
"The Quest of Erebor" was originally written in the 1950s to be an appendix to The Lord of the Rings, but Tolkien decided not to include it due to space limitations, and only a very abridged version of the tale occurred in Appendix A, III "Durin's Folk". Though none of the original manuscripts were dated, it can be deduced that the story was written no earlier than September 29, 1953—the date Tolkien first received page proofs for The Fellowship of the Ring. A note in the earliest known draft referenced a page number in Fellowship. There are multiple manuscripts extant of the work.
|
|
Miller stated later, "My job as a Stalinist was to keep track of the sailing of all Trotskyite seamen so a Stalinist agent would be at the port and have surveillance on whatever Trotskyites entered the Soviet Union." Miller's primary KGB contacts, as noted in Venona traffic, were Joseph Katz and a woman he knew as Sylvia Getzoff, also known as Rebecca Getzoff. In the first half of 1944, Miller met in New York with Jack Soble who provided the KGB with microfilm of the page proofs of Leon Trotsky's biography of Joseph Stalin. Miller carried the microfilm to Mexico for the SWP to present to Natalia Sedova, Trotsky's widow.
|
|
Berlin: Springer-Verlag. . (NOTE: this PDF is from the page proofs, and is not identical to the published version) The fungi that are parasitized by myco-heterotrophs are typically fungi with large energy reserves to draw on, usually mycorrhizal fungi, though there is some evidence that they may also parasitize parasitic fungi that form extensive mycelial networks, such as Armillaria. Examples of fungi parasitized by myco- heterotrophic plants can be found among the ectomycorrhizal, arbuscular mycorrhizal, and orchid mycorrhizal fungi. The great diversity in unrelated plant families with myco-heterotrophic members, as well as the diversity of fungi targeted by myco-heterotrophs, suggests multiple parallel evolution of myco-heterotrophs from mycorrhizal ancestors.
|
|
The British edition, set by Bentley's printers from the American page proofs with Melville's revisions and corrections, differs from the American edition in over 700 wordings and thousands of punctuation and spelling changes. Excluding the preliminaries and the one extract, the three volumes of the British edition came to 927 pagesTanselle (1988), 685 and the single American volume to 635 pages.Tanselle (1988), 687 Accordingly, the dedication to Hawthorne in the American edition — "this book is inscribed to"— became "these volumes are inscribed to" in the British.Cited in Tanselle (1988), 673 The table of contents in the British edition generally follows the actual chapter titles in the American edition, but 19 titles in the American table of contents differ from the titles above the chapters themselves.
|
|
Boner also aided Stedman with the latter's Library of American Literature, and of that service it is recorded "for the accuracy of the text we are greatly indebted to the friendship and professional skill of John H. Boner, of the Century Dictionary staff, who has given much of his spare time to the correcting of our page-proofs, and in other ways has been of service to the work". Boner continued to write poetry, and became recognized as a literary man of much force. His standing as a man of letters received further recognition by his election in 1888 to membership in the Authors Club in New York. His best known poem, "Poe's Cottage at Fordham", appeared in the Century Magazine in November, 1889.
|
|
In a follow-up analysis he concluded that he could find 'no way of avoiding the inference that Dershowitz copied the quotation from Twain from Peters's From Time Immemorial, and not from the original source', as Dershowitz claimed. Michael Desch, political science professor at University of Notre Dame observed: > Not only did Dershowitz improperly present Peters's ideas, he may not even > have bothered to read the original sources she used to come up with them. > Finkelstein somehow managed to get uncorrected page proofs of The Case for > Israel in which Dershowitz appears to direct his research assistant to go to > certain pages and notes in Peters's book and place them in his footnotes > directly (32, col. 3).Michael C. Desch, "The Chutzpah of Alan Dershowitz," > The American Conservative 5 December 2005, online posting, > normanfinkelstein.
|
|
93 Saruman did not appear in the first draft of the chapter 'The Scouring of the Shire'. Christopher Tolkien writes: "It is striking that here, virtually at the end of the Lord of the Rings and in an element that my father had long meditated [that, among other things,] he did not perceive that it was Saruman who was the real Boss, Sharkey, at Bag End [...]" The name used by Saruman's henchmen for their diminished leader is said in a footnote to the final text to be derived from an Orkish term meaning "old man". Saruman's death scene, in which his body shrivels away to skin and bones revealing "long years of death" and "a pale shrouded figure" rises over the corpse,The Return of the King Book VI Chapter VIII p.363 was not added until the page proofs of the completed book were being reviewed by Tolkien.
|
|
In his review of Beyond Chutzpah, echoing Finkelstein's criticisms, Michael Desch, political science professor at University of Notre Dame observed: > Not only did Dershowitz improperly present Peters's ideas, he may not even > have bothered to read the original sources she used to come up with them. > Finkelstein somehow managed to get uncorrected page proofs of The Case for > Israel in which Dershowitz appears to direct his research assistant to go to > certain pages and notes in Peters's book and place them in his footnotes > directly (32, col. 3). Oxford academic Avi Shlaim had also been critical of Dershowitz, saying he believed that the charge of plagiarism "is proved in a manner that would stand up in court."Mandy Garner,"The Good Jewish Boys Go into Battle," Times Higher Education Supplement, December 16, 2005 Los Angeles attorney Frank Menetrez concluded in an opinion piece that he can find "no way of avoiding the inference that Dershowitz copied the quotation from Twain from Peters' From Time Immemorial, and not from the original source," as Dershowitz claimed.
|
|