In the view of the movie, the character has earned both objectifications.
|
|
Taking back her own identity from all of these objectifications that people did of her.
|
|
However, these writings – irreproducible and unrepresentative – have been premised on a process of communication. They were not intended to be passive material and they are not objectifications of the imagination. They are compounds of political and social experiences, and of artistic creation.
|
|
Niranjan or Niranjana (Sanskrit: ') is a word from the Sanskrit literature of Hindu tradition, which means, spotless, pure, supreme being, devoid of all objectifications, without any bad quality (attributes), active, truthful, great and it is lord Shiva . It is also Lord Krishna according to Bhagavad Gita.
|
|
Bakhtin (1984). p. 166Morson and Emerson (1990). p. 37 On the individual level, this means that a person can never be entirely externally defined: it is essential to subjective consciousness that it retains the ability to never be fully enclosed by others' objectifications. Though external finalization (definition, description, causal or genetic explanation etc) is inevitable and even necessary, it can never be the whole truth, devoid of the living response of the subjective consciousness.
|
|
Eero Tarasti considered Dasein very important in Existential Semiotics. Jacques Lacan turned in the 1950s to Heidegger's Dasein for his characterisation of the psychoanalyst as being-for-death: (être-pour-la-mort).Roudinesco, É., Jacques Lacan (1999) p. 249-50 Similarly, he saw the analysand as searching for authentic speech, as opposed to “the subject who loses his meaning in the objectifications of discourse...[which] will give him the wherewithal to forget his own existence and his own death”.
|
|
There is also a textual link/rationale provided in the literature. Both links involve a leap of faith on the part of the reader; that is, we don't believe that one method for this interpretation is necessarily better than the other, or that one form of justification for such an interpretation outweighs its competitor. ; Accounts : Accounts are the ways members signify, describe or explain the properties of a specific social situation. They can consist of both verbal and non-verbal objectifications.
|
|
Dubler praises Bouteldja's "joyful spirit" and the "mischievous fashion" in which the book's argument is articulated, and argues that "Whites, Jews, and Us shows the reader an exceedingly good time." Dubler proclaims his allegiance to Bouteldja's "we", but questions her two "yous" ("whites" and "Jews"), who, he argues, are both included via a demand for solidarity, and excluded. Dubler argues that in the American context, "The hailing of white people as white people" has lost its political resonance, as > To heed the call is to establish one's bona fides as the exception to the > rule. Those who embrace these objectifications find absolution in their > confession, and thereby exempt themselves from the charge.
|
|
According to Peter Burger, some of the theories involving aesthetics can come all the way back to the writings of Karl Marx. According to Burger, " For Marx, this development is not merely one in economic theory. Rather, he feels that the possibility of a progress in knowledge is a function of the development of the object toward which insight directs itself ... Marx demonstrates through the example of the category of labor also applies to objectifications in the arts ... it is only with aestheticism that the full unfolding of the phenomenon of art became a fact, and it is to aestheticism that the historical avant-garde movements respond". Besides from the idea of Karl Marx's influence over the avant-garde movement, much of the movement came through social commentary from the wars that were fought during the time of its rise.
|
|
He began with the mainstream understanding of culture as the product of human cognitive activity, and the Boasian emphasis on the subjective meanings of objects as dependent on their cultural context. He defined culture as "a mental phenomenon, consisting of the contents of minds, not of material objects or observable behavior." He then devised a three-tiered model linking cultural anthropology to archeology, which he called conjunctive archaeology: # Culture, which is unobservable (behavior) and nonmaterial # Behaviors resulting from culture, which are observable and nonmaterial # Objectifications, such as artifacts and architecture, which are the result of behavior and material That is, material artifacts were the material residue of culture, but not culture itself. Taylor's point was that the archaeological record could contribute to anthropological knowledge, but only if archaeologists reconceived their work not just as digging up artifacts and recording their location in time and space, but as inferring from material remains the behaviors through which they were produced and used, and inferring from these behaviors the mental activities of people.
|
|