We have no sensations resembling necessitation, and, yet, causes necessitate their effects.
|
|
For this reason the determination we are concerned with is not a necessitation.
|
|
Hence the will directs with absolute necessity and is itself subject to no necessitation.
|
|
Moral obligation is not necessitation. The moral law commands but does not coerce us.
|
|
An action plan to resolve the issue will by necessitation consist of several steps.
|
|
The authors attack the common view that causation involves necessity by distinguishing between causal 'production' and necessitation.
|
|
This tends to have the individual an over necessitation in the sense of their responsibility to the animal.
|
|
In virtue of their contents, psychological states stand in logical relations like incompatibility, material implication, and conceptual necessitation.
|
|
The voluntary actions of men are now seen to claim an equal freedom from the necessitation of natural causes.
|
|
Now the will's necessitation by the final end was a claim that virtually all late thirteenth-century thinkers, voluntarists and intellectualists alike, accepted.
|
|
On the second reading, no moral necessitation is possible with regard to the choice to live, since morality first arises after the choice is made.
|
|
In addition to the existence of modal fixed points, we assume the following rules of inference for the provability operator \Box: # (necessitation) From \vdash A conclude \vdash \Box A: Informally, this says that if A is a theorem, then it is provable. # (internal necessitation) \vdash \Box A \rightarrow \Box \Box A: If A is provable, then it is provable that it is provable. # (box distributivity) \vdash \Box (A \rightarrow B) \rightarrow (\Box A \rightarrow \Box B): This rule allows you to do modus ponens inside the provability operator. If it is provable that A implies B, and A is provable, then B is provable.
|
|
The initially installed gates were of oak, operated by hydraulically activated chains. The new east pier was long and constructed of timber, on the west side part of the old pier was removed and a new pier section added, meeting the old at a "V". Construction of the dock's quays was delayed due to the weak ground conditions encountered, necessitation a partial redesign, and increasing cost. The north and south quays were supported on square reinforced piles spaced laterally and longitudinally at a distance of .
|
|
A few days later, on 8 December 2013, Matteo Renzi became the new leader of the Democratic Party. In his victory speech, he vowed to change the electoral law to counter the risk of "stabilized grand coalitions". Renzi's reformist agenda ultimately led to him replacing Letta as prime minister. Renzi came to an agreement with coalition partner Silvio Berlusconi regarding a set of institutional reforms, including a new majority-assuring law based on a two-round system, designed to make the necessitation of a grand coalition impossible.
|
|
There is no independent necessitation of change and becoming, other than what God has ordained. To posit an independent causality outside of God's knowledge and action is to deprive Him of true agency, and diminish His attribute of power. In his famous example, when fire and cotton are placed in contact, the cotton is burned not because of the heat of the fire, but through God's direct intervention, a claim which he defended using logic. In the 12th century, this theory was defended and further strengthened by the Islamic theologian Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, using his expertise in the natural sciences of astronomy, cosmology and physics.
|
|
Heyting algebras and interior algebras are the Lindenbaum–Tarski algebras for intuitionistic logic and the modal logic S4, respectively. A logic for which Tarski's method is applicable, is called algebraizable. There are however a number of logics where this is not the case, for instance the modal logics S1, S2, or S3, which lack the rule of necessitation (⊢φ implying ⊢□φ), so ~ (defined above) is not a congruence (because ⊢φ→ψ does not imply ⊢□φ→□ψ). Another type of logics where Tarski's method is inapplicable are relevance logics, because given two theorems an implication from one to the other may not itself be a theorem in a relevance logic.
|
|
Non-normal worlds were introduced by Saul Kripke in 1965 as a purely technical device to provide semantics for modal logics weaker than the system K — in particular, modal logics that reject the rule of necessitation: : \vdash A \Rightarrow \ \vdash \Box A. Such logics are typically referred to as "non- normal." Under the standard interpretation of modal vocabulary in Kripke semantics, we have \vdash A if and only if in each model, A holds in all worlds. To construct a model in which A holds in all worlds but \Box A does not, we need either to interpret \Box in a non-standard manner (that is, we do not just consider the truth of A in every accessible world), or we reinterpret the condition for being valid. This latter choice is what Kripke does.
|
|
Therefore, > Humility: We have no knowledge of the intrinsic properties of substances." According to van Cleve, Langton's irreducibility premise contains three components: first, that the relational properties of objects have causal power, and that by 'sensing' them, we enter into 'causal relations' with them; second, that establishing causal relations with one set of an object's properties does not necessitate establishing such relations with another set of that object's properties; and third, that necessitation in this context should be understood as logical or metaphysical necessity (as opposed to nomological or physical necessity). With these clarifications, van Cleve offers a more robust version of Langton's claim as follows: > "Receptivity: We have knowledge only of those properties of things in virtue > of which they enter into causal relations with us. > Irreducibility: The causal relations between things are not necessitated by > their intrinsic properties.
|
|
But while statement 2 overcomes the problem of worlds at which there is some extra stuff (sometimes referred to as the "epiphenomenal ectoplasm problem"See e.g., Stoljar, 2009, section 4.3.) it faces a different challenge: the so-called "blockers problem".See Hawthorne, 2002. Imagine a world where the relation between the physical and non-physical properties at this world (call the world w1) is slightly weaker than metaphysical necessitation, such that a certain kind of non-physical intervener—"a blocker"—could, were it to exist at w1, prevent the non-physical properties in w1 from being instantiated by the instantiation of the physical properties at w1. Since statement 2 rules out worlds which are physical duplicates of w1 that also contain non-physical interveners by virtue of the minimality, or that's-all clause, statement 2 gives the (allegedly) incorrect result that physicalism is true at w1. One response to this problem is to abandon statement 2 in favour of the alternative possibility mentioned earlier in which supervenience-based formulations of physicalism are restricted to what David Chalmers (1996) calls "positive properties".
|
|
Chalmers, 1996 Adopting the former suggestion here, we can reformulate statement 1 as follows: 2) Physicalism is true at a possible world w if and only if any world that is a minimal physical duplicate of w is a duplicate of w simpliciter. Applied in the same way, statement 2 is the claim that physicalism is true at a possible world w if and only if any world that is a physical duplicate of w (without any further changes), is duplicate of w without qualification. This allows a world in which there are only physical properties to be counted as one at which physicalism is true, since worlds in which there is some extra stuff are not "minimal" physical duplicates of such a world, nor are they minimal physical duplicates of worlds that contain some non-physical properties that are metaphysically necessitated by the physical.Where "metaphysical necessitation" here simply means that if "B" metaphysically necessitates "A" then any world in which B is instantiated is a world in which A is instantiated--a consequence of the metaphysical supervenience of A upon B. See Kripke, 1972.
|
|