These immoveables are deemed to be moveables with respect to each partner, only so long as the company lasts.
|
|
There are, however, moveables that are considered immoveables, because they can be regarded as dependencies or appurtenances of tenements and other civil things.
|
|
We would also note, in respect of the publication of rights: real security on moveables, transfers of authority over immoveables and expropriation procedure.
|
|
Country dwellers often had precise knowledge of the quality and value of their neighbours' properties and estates, in relation to both moveables and immoveables.
|
|
The interior is baroquized, the main altar has a valuable baldachin structure. The statue of Saint Charles Borromeo, a patron of the seminary, is on its cupola. Almost all the altars, the pulpit and other moveables are from years 1760–1770. Its preserved Gothic elements document a plaster Gothic decoration.
|
|
Julius was toying with explosive material. Naturally Ottavio refused, and Alessandro supported him. The Farnese underwent a complete breach in relations with the Pope, and Alessandro was immediately unwelcome in Rome. Pope Julius sequestrated his diocese of Monreale, and confiscated all of the moveables in the Palazzo Farnese, said to have been worth 30,000 scudi.
|
|
Okhta yard was closed and the moveables were sold in the following year. C. M. Dahlström company held claims of over 4.5 million marks to the bankrupt estate. The Dahlström brothers took immediate actions to restart the operations in Turku, in order to secure their property. Therefore, only such property was sold that was not necessary for production.
|
|
W:m Crichton & C:o was officially filed for bankruptcy on 24 April 1913. The estate announced that the claims of trading house C. M. Dahlström, owned by the Dahlström brothers, reached over 4.5 million marks. Therefore, the Dahlström brothers took immediate actions to defend their assets. The Okhta yard was closed and in the following year its moveables were sold.
|
|
Corporeal moveables, ie: property which can be physically moved such as personal items, furniture, cars etc. can be possessed with an animus and corpus. Possession of corporeal moveable property is relevant in Scots criminal law with criminal offences involving possession; such as those relating to drugs, under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, for possession of an illegal substance,Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 s.5 or theft.
|
|
This is locally stated to be the origin of the Mudaliar settlement, colloquially termed "Mudaliar Kottai". In 1757, Hyder Ali captured Sholavandan, on his way from Dindigul to Madurai, reportedly "sweeping of the whole of the cattle and moveables in the surrounding country". This invasion was reportedly at the invitation of Puli Thevar and the then ruler of Madurai, Barkadthullah. Under the British rule, Sholavandan started receiving some benefits of a settled administration.
|
|
By requiring a conveyance stage as well as the formation of a contract, Scots law adopts the traditio system where the cause of the transfer may be void or voidable, but the conveyance remains legally valid. Areas of Scots law, such as the law of sale in contract law have been, what is termed by some Scots legal academics as, "anglicised",van Vliet, Lars (May 2008). "The Transfer of Moveables in Scotland and England". Edinburgh Law Review.
|
|
The current main entrance to the tomb is an arched opening in the side of the hill, not the original main entrance. After discovery the few surviving remains were moved and interred with honor elsewhere or unknowingly discarded. The moveables—the one whole sarcophagus and the fragments of other sarcophagi—were placed on display in the hall of the Pio-Clementino Museum at the Vatican in 1912. The sepulchre is a rock-cut chambered tomb on the interior, with the remains of a late façade on the exterior.
|
|
In 1290, a law explicitly prohibited that a nobleman's estates could be seized by another nobleman who was not a member of his clan through marrying a daughter entitled to the daughters' quarter. The amount payable to the daughters was determined in accordance with a set of rules known as "commun estimation", which always gave a value lower than the market price. If a nobleman's male heirs could not pay off his daughter in moveables, they were entitled to compensate her in land, stipulating the right to redeem it at a pre-arrenged price.
|
|
However, the share of land and moveables of the other sons was only slightly smaller than that of the eldest and the youngest son. Only in the southern part of the country was the house inherited by the youngest son; in the north it was inherited by the eldest son. The Russian family of around 1900 considered property such as the house, agricultural implements, livestock and produce as belonging collectively to all family members. When the father died, his role as head of the family (known as Khozain, or Bolshak ) was passed to the oldest person in the house.
|
|
This delict involved bad faith, but violent enforcement of claims, even in good faith, needed repression. Such conduct had been criminal from the Republic, and Marcus Aurelius provided that one who seized property to satisfy a claim, without judicial process, should forfeit his claim. In A.D. 389 it was provided that one who seized property under a bona fide claim of right should, if the claim was well founded, forfeit his right, and if it was unfounded should give back the property and its value as well. This penalty applied to land as well as moveables.
|
|
Fine weather, to the great comfort of the locomotive public. Never > knew the city in such a chaotic state. Every other house seems to be > disgorging itself into the street; all the sidewalks are lumbered with > bureaus and bedsteads to the utter destruction of their character as > thoroughfares, and all the space between the sidewalks is occupied by long > processions of carts and wagons and vehicles omnigenous laden with perilous > piles of moveables. We certainly haven't advanced as a people beyond the > nomadic or migratory stage of civilization analogous to that of the pastoral > cow feeders of the Tartar Steppes.Strong, George Templeton; Nevins, Allan & > Thomas, Milton Halsey (eds.) (1952) The Diary of George Templeton Strong.
|
|
He is also deprived of the perfect words (Blessings of the Imam) # If a person taking the oath breaks it, all his possessions, i.e. moveables, cash, housing, utensils, jewels, ornaments, carriages, horses, cattle, milking cows, she buffaloes, slaves, males and females and all worldly materials become unlawful for him. All his property is liable to be looted and to be distributed among the poor and the needy. When he takes the oath again and accepts all the terms of that covenant then his things become lawful to him and then only he is entitled to get his things back # All the benefits which he had already enjoyed (from his possessions) becomes unlawful i.e.
|
|
Apparel, beds, &c.; were hastily conveyed to a distance, but the unfortunate owners were compelled to witness the demolition of their peaceful habitation – the small remaining hope of saving the residue of their property was not left them long. The destructive element made rapid progress towards the depository of their moveables and quickly was the wreck complete – of a watch, the wheels alone remained – an old Kangaroo dog, guarding, it is supposed, the last relics of his master's worldly goods, had the hair literally singed off him, and his legs left in a pitiable state. The fate of their Cattle is not yet known, whether destroyed in the conflagration or driven into the bush.
|
|
He was in Ireland with his uncle Mr James Alexander in May 1679, and came over to Scotland after the scuffle at Drumclog in June, and went to his house at Crawford's Dyke, where understanding the conduct of the west country army, he had no freedom to join them, though his own brother James Spreul, and two cousins, John Spreul writer, and John Spreul merchant in Glasgow, were with them in arms. His business obliged him to be with some in that army, but he never joined them. After the defeat at Bothwell he absconded again, however his wife and family was turned out of his house and shop, and all the moveables secured. Within a little he retired to Holland, and stayed there some time.
|
|
A regulation in 1525, on 22 January was driven by the fact that dissolution of the Tallinn's Ministerial Brothers fraternity did not help to get the important part of the fraternity's property, because Brothers had hidden more valuable moveables and documents, largely near Harju and Viru vassals, but also partly at the houses of citizens. After the dissolution of fraternity in 1525, on 12 January, the management of abbey (prior Augustinus Emsinckhoff, lecturer and subprior Thomas de Reken and procurator David Sliper) was taken into custody to force them to reveal the information about the location of abbey's treasure and privileges. The reports of all three have remained, but are not dated. Judging from the hints that can be found in these letters about the negotiations between the procurator and prior about the issue of treasure, the reports were compiled probably after issuing the Town council regulation.
|
|
As it was said, the Dominicans did not only place their property at the houses of Tallinn's inhabitants and the Town Hall could have had the information about it (the penalization of the people living outside of the town was a juridical problem for the Town Hall). Appealing to the clergy as well as to the secular was a formality of the stronghold of the elite in that time, because the prosecution of the clergymen had to be very doubtful for the Town Hall in a Catholic town. Some expressions that concern the distribution of the Brothers’ property, are with a certain content and refer to the fact that the delivery process took place according to all the moveables deposition rules, cannot be excluded that with a judicial involvement. What were these rules like, is sadly unknown – any medieval Tallinn's remained act does not describe such a procedure.
|
|
The remedy is therefore considered to be open to all possessors of land and natural possessors of corporeal moveables, including those who acquired possession themselves unlawfully (such as a thief) and can even be used against the owner of property too. As Lord Bankton, the institutional writer notes: > "The pursuer's title, in an action of spuilie [sic], is possession of the > goods ... and if the possession was peaceable, even the true owner, seizing > the goods from the possessor, will be liable in a spuilie ... The party that > is violently deprived of the possession must be first restored, and then the > question of property considered ..."Bankton I,10,126. However, in practice an owner of property can concurrently raise proceedings of an action of vindication (vindicatio) or similar proceedings to recover ownership of the property so the use of an action of spuilzie is limited against an owner. Yet, in theory, it is legally valid to raise an action of spuilzie against an owner as spuilzie focuses on possession alone.
|
|