Sentences Generator
And
Your saved sentences

No sentences have been saved yet

21 Sentences With "making a ruling"

How to use making a ruling in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "making a ruling" and check conjugation/comparative form for "making a ruling". Mastering all the usages of "making a ruling" from sentence examples published by news publications.

It will hear evidence for three days before making a ruling.
"And that might be OK — I'm not even making a ruling on it," he said.
The L.A. County Coroner is awaiting toxicology results before officially making a ruling ... which could be a few more weeks.
The medical examiner's office said it was conducting further studies before making a ruling on the cause of the boy's death.
At this point, it's unlikely the Court would hear the case until spring of 2019 — making a ruling in late June of 2019 most likely.
"Health care will be used as a political issue way beyond the ramifications of one district judge making a ruling that has no immediate impact," Blunt said.
Officials sidestepped making a ruling on whether the design of the shoes — extra-thick soles and springlike, carbon-fiber shanks that spring runners forward — gives an unfair advantage to runners who wear them.
The conciliation body will be responsible for validating environmental infractions, holding hearings with the defendants in which it can "present possible legal solutions to close out the dispute" and making a ruling in the case.
Judge Trevor McFadden, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by President Donald Trump, said he wanted to review the case over the weekend before making a ruling and scheduled a follow-up hearing for Monday at 10 a.m.
Plural Mujāhidūn (مجاهدون). ;Mujtahid (مجتهد) : a scholar who uses reason for the purpose of forming an opinion or making a ruling on a religious issue. Plural: Mujtahidun. ;Mullah (ملا) : are Islamic clergy.
Felton stopped rowing believing he had won on the foul but the umpire, Bill Beach ordered the men to continue rather than making a ruling. He later said that they were in neutral water and the foul in no way affected the result of the race. It was likely he believed the foul was accidental as an intentional foul would have cost the perpetrator the race. The umpire's decision was final.
Supporters of Amendment 3 said that the amendment would do three things: #Prevent state courts from making a ruling that current Utah marriage legislation as being unconstitutional. #Prevent state courts from forcing recognition of out-of-state marriages. #Prevent the creation of "counterfeit marriages", such as civil unions. They also said the amendment would not hurt heterosexual marriage, common law marriages, or the right to will property to whomever one wishes.
Felton offered Barry a return match, which was to be held in Sydney. During the race in August 1920, Felton led for the first half and then Barry fouled his opponent. Felton stopped rowing, believing he had won on the foul, but the umpire, Bill Beach ordered the men to continue rather than making a ruling. It was likely he believed the foul was accidental and did not make a difference to the race.
The Court said that states could undertake re- sentencing, or offer parole to inmates sentenced to life as minors. Up to 2,300 cases nationwide may be affected by the ruling. Another case affected by the ruling would be the sentence that Lee Boyd Malvo received for his role in the D.C. sniper attacks, with a judge making a ruling similar to Montgomery v. Louisiana. Malvo's trial progress had earlier been affected by Roper v.
The court hears only cases "solely with teenage batterers and their victim." During February 2010, while making a ruling on the bench, Hyman made a comment regarding a boycott of Judge Andrea Bryan. "I look to my colleague, who is now a subject of much public debate and in some quarters ridicule, and wonder whether or not I would have the courage to do what I thought was right." In this case involving a murder suspect, Hyman found the individual factually innocent.
There were several ways around that. One was "confessing and avoiding", introducing and discussing contradicting the facts reported by the jailer, but simply invalidating them. A second method was "proceeding by rule and motion"; by making a ruling that was independent of the return, the judges did not technically argue with the return or contradict it, but the same outcome was reached as if they had done so. That caused some concern because of feelings that it restricted the ability of the courts to deal with arguments over facts from the applicant for the writ.
Although it may be useful for the purposes of interpretation, it > cannot be used in making a ruling that runs counter to a clear legal > provision [...] As we will see, [Sections] 1, 19 and 20 of this [Act] > identify the targeted incorporated organizations and groups with the > greatest possible precision. It is these standard-setting texts that are > decisive. The report discussed several objections regarding the word "secte" (cult): > ... the word ‘sect’ has taken on an extremely pejorative connotation. In the > eyes of the public, it stigmatises movements whose activities are dangerous > either for their members or for society.
One of the unresolved issues raised by the re-initiation of the Guantanamo captives' habeas petitions is whether Federal civilian judges have the authority to order the Executive Branch to set captives free in the United States. The United States Supreme Court has considered making a ruling in the case of the Kiyemba petitioners, over whether the Judicial Branch has that authority. In 2009 the State Department was able to get Bermuda to offer residency to four of the Uyghur captives. A delegation from the small Pacific Ocean State of Palau visited the Uyghurs in Guantanamo, and eventually offered residency to all but one of the Uyghur captives.
In 1912, Hanford became the subject of public controversy, and an impeachment investigation by the United States House of Representatives, after a ruling in which he revoked the citizenship of an immigrant as having been procured by fraud, allegedly due to the person's Socialist beliefs. A House committee investigating the impeachment resolution heard testimony accusing Hanford of habitual drunkenness, and of having accepted financial favors from the Northern Pacific Railroad after making a ruling that reduced the company's tax liability. Hanford resigned his judgeship immediately after the testimony about the Northern Pacific transaction was completed, amid insinuations in the press that further witnesses were about to reveal even more corrupt behavior. The House committee terminated its impeachment proceedings upon his resignation.
Fresco of the Judgment of Solomon, Frauenberg, Styria The Judgment of Solomon is a story from the Hebrew Bible in which King Solomon of Israel ruled between two women both claiming to be the mother of a child. Solomon revealed their true feelings and relationship to the child by suggesting to cut the baby in two, with each woman to receive half. With this strategy, he was able to discern the non-mother as the woman who entirely approved of this proposal, while the actual mother begged that the sword might be sheathed and the child committed to the care of her rival. Some consider this approach to justice an archetypal example of an impartial judge displaying wisdom in making a ruling.
On August 9, the Senate committee filed suit in federal district court to force President Nixon to make the subpoenaed tapes available. Hoping to avoid making a ruling, the Court asked the parties to negotiate an out of court solution; their effort to find an acceptable compromise failed however, largely due to Nixon's intransigence. Nevertheless, Nixon soon began contemplating ways to accommodate Cox, the Senate Watergate committee, and Sirica after two polls showed that public opinion was solidly against him: 61 percent of those responding to a Gallup Poll said the president should release the subpoenaed tapes to the court; 54 percent of those responding to a Harris Poll said Congress would be justified in beginning impeachment proceedings against the president if he refused to obey a court order directing him to turn over the tapes., p. 226.

No results under this filter, show 21 sentences.

Copyright © 2024 RandomSentenceGen.com All rights reserved.