Sentences Generator
And
Your saved sentences

No sentences have been saved yet

11 Sentences With "exceed the scope of"

How to use exceed the scope of in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "exceed the scope of" and check conjugation/comparative form for "exceed the scope of". Mastering all the usages of "exceed the scope of" from sentence examples published by news publications.

The senator's propensity for voting no on bills he finds to exceed the scope of government strikes some colleagues as sincere constitutionalism, but exasperates others.
Judge Beetlestone agreed, finding that the Trump administration's rules "exceed the scope of the agencies' authority under the ACA" and find no refuge as a legitimate accommodation under RFRA.
Christopher Allen, a spokesperson for the FBI, told Motherboard in an email that, "As a matter of practice the FBI narrowly tailors warrants, and we do not exceed the scope of those warrants."
But if a tribal official's tortious acts exceed the scope of his or her authority, the official is subject to suit for those acts. See Cosentino vs. Fuller, Cal. Ct. App.
It also enables them to utilize specialized personnel whose technical knowledge base and experience may exceed the scope of the business, thus providing a higher level of technical support to their employees.
Separately, the Justice Department argued in a filing in the district court than Hanen's ordered sanctions "exceed the scope of [the court's] authority and unjustifiably impose irreparable injury on the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security and thousands of innocent third parties."Brent Kendall (May 31, 2016). Justice Department Pushes Back on Sweeping Sanction, The Wall Street Journal. The Justice Department also argued that additional ethics courses could cost up to $7.8 million over five years.
For businesses needing to provide technical support, outsourcing allows them to maintain a high availability of service. Such need may result from peaks in call volumes during the day, periods of high activity due to introduction of new products or maintenance service packs, or the requirement to provide customers with a high level of service at a low cost to the business. It allows businesses to utilize specialized personnel whose technical knowledge base and experience may exceed the scope of the business, thus providing a higher level of technical support to their employees.
Sociedad Estatal Loterías y Apuestas del Estado (Spanish for "State Society for State Lotteries and Bets", SELAE) is a state-owned company assigned to the Spanish Ministry of Finance responsible the management, operation and marketing of all types of lotteries and games nationwide or whenever they exceed the scope of a region. The company was created in 1984 due to the integration of the services that until then managed the State games —the Mutual Sports Betting Board and the National Lottery Service— and it was last reformed in 2010. It assumes the State powers on lotteries, an activity promoted by the State since 1763.
Contrary to popular belief, the dealership has no obligation to buy back the vehicle, because the dealership does not warrant the vehicle, the manufacturer does. Lemon laws offer remedies that exceed the scope of a vehicle manufacturer's warranty. While a manufacturer's warranty might obligate a vehicle manufacturer to make a repair at no cost to the consumer, warranties do not include maximum time periods for the completion of repair, nor do they trigger buy-back provisions if the repair cannot be completed within such a time period. Some state lemon laws cover only certain classes of vehicles, such as vehicles purchased for individual use but not for business use, or vehicles under a certain gross weight.
Both elicit assumptions being made based on inferences drawn from observable data, which can be falsified or otherwise inaccurate, undermining the integrity of the process. (2014) 37(2) University of New South Wales Law Journal 713 Critics of the increasing role played by data-based surveillance for the purposes of law enforcement foresee that such reliance could lead to issues in prosecuting individuals based on a probability-based crime system. Furthermore, such a system holds the potential for conclusions to be drawn by attributing weighting to certain characteristics of an individual – an approach which could inadvertently mask any discriminatory agendas held by law enforcement bodies potentially targeting certain minorities. Adding to the potential for discrimination, many big data algorithms often create new categories that exceed the scope of regulations designed to prevent against the unfair or discriminatory use of data.
In the United States federal Courts, a cross-examining attorney is typically not permitted to ask questions that do not pertain to the testimony offered during direct examination, but most state courts do permit a lawyer to cross-examine a witness on matters not raised during direct examination. Similarly, courts in England, South Africa, Australia, and Canada allow a cross-examiner to exceed the scope of direct examination. Since a witness called by the opposing party is presumed to be hostile, cross-examination does permit leading questions. A witness called by a direct examiner, on the other hand, may only be treated as hostile by that examiner after being permitted to do so by the judge, at the request of that examiner and as a result of the witness being openly antagonistic and/or prejudiced against the party that called them.

No results under this filter, show 11 sentences.

Copyright © 2024 RandomSentenceGen.com All rights reserved.