Sentences Generator
And
Your saved sentences

No sentences have been saved yet

18 Sentences With "causing to be"

How to use causing to be in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "causing to be" and check conjugation/comparative form for "causing to be". Mastering all the usages of "causing to be" from sentence examples published by news publications.

"My Lords, I declare My Consent to a Contract of Matrimony between My Most Dearly Beloved Grandson Prince Henry Charles Albert David of Wales and Rachel Meghan Markle, which Consent I am causing to be signified under the Great Seal and to be entered in the Books of the Privy Council," she wrote.
"I declare My Consent to a Contract of Matrimony between My Most Dearly Beloved Grandson Prince Henry Charles Albert David of Wales and Rachel Meghan Markle, which Consent I am causing to be signified under the Great Seal and to be entered in the Books of the Privy Council," the statement released to the public the following day read.
"My Lords, I declare My Consent to a Contract of Matrimony between My Most Dearly Beloved Grandson Prince Henry Charles Albert David of Wales and Rachel Meghan Markle, which Consent I am causing to be signified under the Great Seal and to be entered in the Books of the Privy Council," it reads, according to the official documents on People.
"My Lords, I declare My Consent to a Contract of Matrimony between My Most Dearly Beloved Grandson Prince Henry Charles Albert David of Wales and Rachel Meghan Markle, which Consent I am causing to be signified under the Great Seal and to be entered in the Books of the Privy Council," the Queen wrote in a letter released by Buckingham Palace on March 15.
World Patent Marketing also started to include a comprehensive non-disparagement clause in all its contracts that forbade customers from complaining online:The Client and WPM shall refrain from making or causing to be made, publishing, ratifying or endorsing any and all disparaging, negative, or other similar statements concerning either of them to any third party, including but not limited to individuals, entities, internet websites, blogs, publications, postings, emails, and any social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, blogs and wikis.
Per the Municipal Code of Chicago, it's unlawful to use the flag, or any imitation or design thereof, except for the usual and customary purposes of decoration or display. Causing to be displayed on the flag any letter, word, legend, or device not provided for in the Code is also prohibited. Violators are subject to fines between $5.00 and $25.00 for each offense.
By committing and prosecuting divers worthy prelates for humbly petitioning to be excused from concurring to the said assumed power. # By creating and using an organization affiliated with the Catholic Church. By issuing and causing to be executed a commission under the great seal for erecting a court called the Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes. # By the use of funds by Crown for other purposes than the funds were originally granted for by Parliament.
In the past, the area of Samsen to Pak Kret in Nonthaburi used to be a place where abundance of toli shad (Tenualosa toli) was found. They will swim from the sea to spawn in freshwater sources on the Chao Phraya river in Bangkok area to the north. Therefore they are fished in large numbers and causing to be in an endangered state at present.Jaruthanin, Kittipong and Chavalit, Vidthayanon, ปลาน้ำจืดหายากที่สุด ๑๐ ชนิดของไทย (The Top - Ten Endangered Freshwater Fishes of Thailand), Aquarium Biz , Vol.
In fact, it was a forgery, or at least a falsification. Howison was charged at the Court of Justiciary for “treasonably causing to be printed a false, adulterate and altered Act of Parliament instead of the true and genuine Act of 1592. He was sentenced to prison, but the General Assembly petitioned the King and he was released on 7 March 1596. Back in Cambuslang, Howison brought a charge of immorality against James Hamilton of Turnelaw (one of the group who had complained about him to the Court of Session in Edinburgh).
The arrest warrant affidavit says Pou and the nurses "intentionally (killed)" Emmett Everett Sr., 61; Hollis Alford, 66; Ireatha Watson, 89; and Rose Savoie, 90, by administering or causing to be administered lethal doses of morphine sulphate (morphine) and/or midazolam (Versed). According to Kristy Johnson, LifeCare's director of physical medicine, Pou told these patients that she was administering drugs to make them "feel better." The drugs injected are usually given for pain purposes, but not at the levels found in subsequent toxicology reports. The arrests were controversial.
The prosecution argued that Chua had decided to take out his personal frustrations on patients "for reasons truly known only to himself". On 18 May 2015, Chua was convicted on two counts of murder. He was found not guilty of murdering Arnold Lancaster, who had been suffering from terminal cancer, but was convicted of attempting to cause him and twenty other patients grievous bodily harm with intent by poisoning. He was also found guilty of eight offences of unlawfully administering or causing to be taken by another person any poison or destructive or noxious thing with intent to injure, aggrieve or annoy, or attempting to do so, after deliberately altering prescriptions.
Malicious prosecution is a common law intentional tort. While like the tort of abuse of process, its elements include (1) intentionally (and maliciously) instituting and pursuing (or causing to be instituted or pursued) a legal action (civil or criminal) that is (2) brought without probable cause and (3) dismissed in favor of the victim of the malicious prosecution. In some jurisdictions, the term "malicious prosecution" denotes the wrongful initiation of criminal proceedings, while the term "malicious use of process" denotes the wrongful initiation of civil proceedings. Criminal prosecuting attorneys and judges are protected from tort liability for malicious prosecution by doctrines of prosecutorial immunity and judicial immunity.
The phoneme represented by the letter ق in texts is a point of contention. The letter, which in Classical Arabic represented either a voiceless pharyngealized velar stop or a voiceless uvular stop, most likely represented some kind of post- alveolar affricate or velar plosive in Andalusian Arabic. The vowel system was subject to a heavy amount of fronting and raising, a phenomenon known as imāla, causing to be raised, probably to or and, particularly with short vowels, in certain circumstances, particularly when i-mutation was possible. Contact with native Romance speakers led to the introduction of the phonemes , and, possibly, the affricate from loanwords.
Verdun published a book, The Fox in Charge of the Biggest Henhouse in Canada, which is not available for sale after a defamation suit was brought against Verdun by Robert Astley, who was Chair of the Board of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) and a director of the Bank of Montreal. The book cannot be published, circulated or promoted by J. Robert Verdun due to a June 14, 2011, Order of the Superior Court of Justice in the case of Astley v. Verdun. Under the order, Verdun is prohibited from publishing or causing to be published, or otherwise disseminating or distributing in any manner whatsoever, this book or any statements or other communications which refer to Robert Astley by name, depiction or description.
On February 2, 2007, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ruled that the complaint that Tremaine, "engaged in a discriminatory practice on the ground of religion, national or ethnic origin, race and colour, in a matter related to the usage of a telecommunication undertaking" had been substantiated. Tremaine was ordered to pay a fine of $4000.00 and to, "cease the discriminatory practice of communicating telephonically or causing to be communicated telephonically... material... that are likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination, contrary to section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act." As a result of an investigation that began in June 2006, Tremaine was arrested January 23, 2008 and charged with promoting hate on the Internet.
In 1215 Pope Innocent III gave the countship of Melgueil in fief to the Bishop of Maguelone, who thus became a Prince-bishop. From that time the Bishop of Maguelone had the right of coinage. Pope Clement IV reproached (1266) Bishop Bérenger de Frédol with causing to be struck in his diocese a coin called "Miliarensis", on which was rend the name of Mahomet; in fact at that date the bishop, as well as the King of Aragon and the Count of Toulouse, authorized the coinage of Arabic money, not intended for circulation in Maguelone, but to be sold for exportation to the merchants of the Mediterranean. In July, 1204, Montpellier passed into the hands of Peter II of Aragon, son-in-law of the last of the Guillems; James I of Aragon, son of Peter II, united the city to the Kingdom of Majorca.
The Convention does not apply to customs, law enforcement or military aircraft, thus it applies exclusively to civilian aircraft. The Convention criminalises the following behaviour: #Committing an act of violence against a person on board an aircraft in flight if it is likely to endanger the safety of the aircraft; #destroying an aircraft being serviced or damaging such an aircraft in such a way that renders it incapable of flight or which is likely to endanger its safety in flight; #placing or causing to be placed on an aircraft a device or substance which is likely to destroy or cause damage to an aircraft; #destroying or damaging air navigation facilities or interfering with their operation if it is likely to endanger the safety of aircraft; #communicating information which is known to be false, thereby endangering the safety of an aircraft in flight; #attempting any of 1–5; and #being an accomplice to any of 1–6. The Convention sets out the principle of aut dedere aut judicare—that a party to the treaty must either (1) prosecute a person who commits one of the offences or (2) send the individual to another state that requests his or her extradition for prosecution of the same crime.
The Protocol was concluded at the same time as the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (SUA Convention) and like it is based on the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft. The Protocol criminalises the following behaviour: #Seizing control of a fixed platform by force or threat of force; #committing an act of violence against a person on a fixed platform if it is likely to endanger the safety of the platform; #destroying a fixed platform or damaging it in such a way that endangers its safety; #placing or causing to be placed on a fixed platform a device or substance which is likely to destroy or cause damage to the ship or its cargo; #injuring or killing anyone while committing 1–4; #attempting any of 1–5; #being an accomplice to any of 1–6; and #compelling another through threats to commit any of 1–7. The Protocol sets out the principle of aut dedere aut judicare—that a state party to the treaty must either (1) prosecute a person who commits one of the offences or (2) send the individual to another state that requests his or her extradition for prosecution of the same crime.

No results under this filter, show 18 sentences.

Copyright © 2024 RandomSentenceGen.com All rights reserved.