Sentences Generator
And
Your saved sentences

No sentences have been saved yet

97 Sentences With "bears the burden"

How to use bears the burden in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "bears the burden" and check conjugation/comparative form for "bears the burden". Mastering all the usages of "bears the burden" from sentence examples published by news publications.

Jesus bears the burden with us until the surprise ending nobody could've imagined.
But the issue is who bears the burden of providing home-care services.
For instance, who bears the burden of truth -- the accuser or the accused?
The prosecution bears the burden of proving conspiracy and fraud beyond a reasonable doubt.
He alone bears the burden of his conduct and alone should suffer the consequences.
And in subsidizing Uber, the town now bears the burden of policy that isn't scalable.
"In all cases, the applicant bears the burden of proof of admissibility," the agency said.
The prosecution bears the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt to show intent and materiality.
Ours is a landscape that bears the burden of human atrocities waged against other humans through war.
Rather, it bears the burden of proving to the U.S. DistrictCourt that the transaction violates the law.
Rather, it bears the burden of proving to the U.S. District Court that the transaction violates the law.
Other trial courts have disagreed with the 8th Circuit's view of which side bears the burden of proof.
"A plaintiff bears the burden of showing that race was a but-for cause of its injury," Gorsuch wrote.
As a result, no one play (or movie) bears the burden of either seeming to affirm, or attempting to negate, stereotype.
He regularly claims that China, not the U.S., bears the burden of the duties, and says that the U.S. is taking in "billions" from China.
Mexico, not the United States, bears the burden of investigating the trial's wide range of criminal allegations, said Guadalupe Correa-Cabrera, a scholar at Rice University's Mexico Center.
If these tariffs on phones and laptops are implemented, there are several scenarios for who bears the burden — and none of them will be palatable to the Trump administration.
This regime violates the most basic principles of due process, where the government—and not the individual—bears the burden of proof before depriving individuals of legally protected rights.
" He was clearly worried about how they might affect his own re-election campaign, adding, "He alone bears the burden of his conduct and alone should suffer the consequences.
As long as the government can show mere probable cause that the asset was used or acquired illegally, the owner bears the burden of proving that it was not.
When art in advertising bears the burden for corporate malpractice, the people involved in these changes get to feel good, but other mechanisms continue to thrive under the surface.
Section 7 of the Communications Act provides that any party opposing the offering of a new technology or service bears the burden of demonstrating it is inconsistent with the public interest.
But their fortunes have markedly diverged because Malaysia has allowed Petronas to follow its own growth path, while Pertamina is hobbled by Indonesian government intervention and bears the burden of a subsidy program.
It's a sad reality that Crazy Rich Asians bears the burden of representation for future Hollywood films with Asian casts, with many studios waiting to see if the film performs at the box office before greenlighting similar new projects.
For at least the next two weeks, Diamond, a Northern Irishman who had a decorated amateur career, will carry McIlroy's clubs while McIlroy bears the burden of determining the yardages and choosing his clubs — and living with the decisions.
"When taking any agency action, the FCC bears the burden of demonstrating that its analysis is supported by the record, and that it has fully engaged with the American public by ensuring their voices are heard," the members wrote.
More than a year after U.S. President Donald Trump fired the first tariff salvo that eventually led to a trade war with China, the debate about who actually bears the burden of those elevated levies has not found a definite conclusion.
Death, even when it perversely unites people, is ultimately between the dead and the living; Of the two people who knew that relationship, one is gone, and Jimmy bears the burden of being the only living soul who experienced it firsthand.
And, ironically, while those in the middle of the country may look at IPOs from Silicon Valley and their investors on Wall Street as disassociated from jobs in the Rust Belt, middle America bears the burden of the declining IPO.
"It's not only bad for airports and infrastructure overall and for the municipal community, but at the end of the day in the airport world, it's the passenger who bears the burden for this change in the House bill," she said.
Ambitious undertakings are growing more frequent—as part of the federal precision medicine initiative, the NIH is seeking to recruit 1 million diverse patients for a study called All of Us. Experts disagree on who bears the burden of change.
We are in the middle of a public health crisis, and the Food and Drug Administration led by Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., the agency which bears the burden of protecting Americans from harmful drugs, is failing the people they are supposed to be helping.
The ACLU highlighted that part of the ruling in a statement: "The court strongly reaffirmed that the Trump administration bears the burden if it attempts to separate families based on an accusation that the adult is not the child's parent," ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said.
Once they retire, they get what is due them, and the insurer bears the burden of paying them, but makes a profit on the deal if the money the employer pays to assume the liabilities produces greater income than the insurer has to disburse over time.
A company opposing a pension-benefit claim bears the burden of proof when a worker makes a prima facie case that he is entitled to the benefits, but does not have access to key information under the company's control that could substantiate the claim, a divided three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled.
Where the plaintiff bears the burden of proving severance damages to the remaining property.
"Blood & Thunder: Who Bears the Burden: Retailer or Publisher," The Comics Journal #148 (Feb. 1992), p. 7.
This differs from a motion in a civil process in which the movant must have standing, and bears the burden of proof.
2d 882, 852 P. 2d 377 (1993). Exemptions must be narrowly construed and the public agency bears the burden of proving that an exemption applies.Bakersfield City School Dist. v.
2d 258, 271 (2004). Likewise, the party asserting privilege, both in the context of joint defense agreements and otherwise, bears the burden of proving the applicability of the privilege.
The Ninth Circuit, firstly, stated that the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing that the jurisdiction is proper.As explained in Boschetto v. Hansing, 539 F3d 1011, 1015 (9th Cir. 2008).
The rhythmic rocking motions combined with repeated trunk rotation and elongation relaxes muscles and improves mobility.Scaer R. 2014. The body bears the burden: trauma, dissociation, and disease, third edition. Routledge. .
A party bears the burden of proof with regard to the facts which he/she alleges in his/her favor, except either where the law provides otherwise or where the circumstances render it manifestly unfair.
The Supreme Court overturned the decisions of the courts below, holding that the Government bears the burden of proving not only that a citizen has enlisted in a foreign state but also that his enlistment was voluntary.
The burden of proof is always on the person who brings a claim in a dispute. It is often associated with the Latin maxim semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, a translation of which in this context is: "the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges."Transnational principle of law: Trans-Lex.org In civil suits for example, the Plaintiff bears the burden of proof that the Defendant's action or inaction caused injury to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant bears the burden of proving an affirmative defense.
Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 (1985), is a United States Supreme Court decision reaffirming due process principles elucidated in Sandstrom v. Montana, that the prosecution bears the burden of proof of establishing the mental element of intent.Criminal Law - Cases and Materials, 7th ed.
The employer can rebut the prima facie case by introducing alternative statistics or by demonstrating that plaintiff's proof is either inaccurate or insignificant.Teamsters, 431 U.S. at 339-41. The plaintiff then bears the burden of proving that the employer's information is biased, inaccurate, or otherwise unworthy of credence.Coates v.
The burden for showing joint defense is the same as the burden for showing attorney client privilege. The party asserting the joint defense agreement always bears the burden of demonstrating its existence by establishing each element of the attorney- client privilege.United States v. Salvagno, et al, 306 F. Supp.
Romaozinho (Portuguese: Romãozinho [xomãw'ziɲu]) is a character from Brazilian folklore who bears the burden of immortality. Because he is cursed with unending life, he is somewhat similar to the character Ahasvero. The legend of Romãozinho started in the Boa Sorte district, Pedro Afonso, Goiás.José A. Teixeira - Folclore Goiano, pp.
In Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that fair use was an affirmative defense to copyright infringement. This means that in litigation on copyright infringement, the defendant bears the burden of raising and proving that the use was fair and not an infringement.
Medtronic is a consequence of the Court's previous ruling in MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., which cleared the way for declaratory judgments to be sought in patent cases. The question as to who bears the burden of proof in such proceedings was the matter at issue in the present case.
The court stated that the plaintiff bears the burden of proof of (1) and (2),As ruled in Sher v. Johnson, 911 F.2d 1357, 1361 (9th Cir. 1990). and if the plaintiff did so, the defendant bears the shifted burden of proof regarding (3) to tell the jurisdiction would be unreasonable.
The framework as currently applied by courts is as follows: #A plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by a preponderance of the evidence, i.e. allege facts that are adequate to support a legal claim. (see the below section for more) #Then the burden of production shifts to the employer, to rebut this prima facie case by "articulat[ing] some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the employee’s rejection."McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 802. #Then the employee may prevail only if he can show that the employer’s response is merely a pretext for behavior actually motivated by discrimination.. Even though the employer bears the burden of production in the second step, the plaintiff bears the burden of persuasion at all times..
In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), the Supreme Court ruled that when a publication involves a public figure, to support a suit for libel the plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the publisher acted with actual malice: knew of the inaccuracy of the statement or acted with reckless disregard of its truth.
2018) ("In removal proceedings involving an LPR, the government bears the burden of proof, which it must meet by adducing clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true.") (internal quotation marks omitted) (summary order); accord (a); ; Mondaca-Vega v. Lynch, 808 F.3d 413, 429 (9th Cir.
Under California law, administrative findings (in this case by the LAPD) are entitled to a presumption of correctness and the petitioner (in this case Dorner) bears the burden of proving that they were incorrect. The appeals court concluded that the LAPD had substantial evidence for its finding that Dorner was not credible in his allegations against Evans.
Attorney fees shall not be awarded in excess of $125.00 per hour unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living or other special factors justifies a higher fee. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (2) (A). The movant bears the burden of producing satisfactory evidence of the prevailing market rate for the kind and quality of legal services rendered. Blum v.
The ratio of tax obligation to income tends to shrink as income increases because high-earners tend to consume proportionally less of their income. Gilbert E. Metcalf. "The National Sales Tax: Who Bears the Burden?" An individual unable to save will pay taxes on all his income, but an individual who saves or invests a portion of his income will be taxed only on the remaining income.
The U.S. Supreme Court described fair use as an affirmative defense in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. This means that in litigation on copyright infringement, the defendant bears the burden of raising and proving that the use was fair and not an infringement. Thus, fair use need not even be raised as a defense unless the plaintiff first shows (or the defendant concedes) a "prima facie" case of copyright infringement.
This issue is related to who bears the burden: users or the general public. Even if users bear the burden, that class must be subdivided, e.g. users during peak times or off-peak, freight or passenger traffic, urban or rural users, residents or non-residents (many toll plazas are located on the state line to maximize revenue from non- residents). A third issue concerns the full costs of transportation.
During patent prosecution, the disclosed utility is presumed valid. The patent office bears the burden to disprove utility. The standard the USPTO uses is whether it is more likely than not that it would lack utility from the perspective of a person having ordinary skill in the art. If the examiner shows evidence that the invention is not useful, the burden shifts to the applicant to prove utility.
Accordingly, the courts have repeatedly emphasized that an overbreadth claimant bears the burden of demonstrating, "from the text of [the law] and from actual fact" that substantial overbreadth exists. Virginia v. Hicks, 539 U.S. 113 (2003). Similarly, "there must be a realistic danger that the statute itself will significantly compromise recognized First Amendment protections of parties not before the Court for it to be facially challenged on overbreadth grounds".
Technically, the presumption of innocence is not a presumption, but rather is a rhetorical expression that emphasizes that the prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal case. The accused has no obligation to adduce evidence in their favor and is automatically acquitted unless the prosecution proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See presumption of innocence. An example of presumption with basic facts is Declared death in absentia, e.g.
Some defences impose an evidential burden on the defendant. If the evidential burden is met, the prosecution then bears the burden of proof (which is not called an evidential burden). For example, if a person charged with murder pleads self- defence, the defendant must satisfy the evidential burden that there is some evidence suggesting self-defence. The burden of proof then falls on the prosecution to produce evidence to support their position.
Inheritance tax treaties often cover estate and gift taxes. Generally fiscal domicile under such treaties is defined by reference to domicile as opposed to tax residence. Such treaties specify what persons and property are subject to tax by each country upon transfer of the property by inheritance or gift. Some treaties specify which party bears the burden of such tax, but often such determination relies on local law (which may differ from country to country).
Since her grandfather was responsible for everything, she believes that she alone bears the burden of setting the world right. Her Persona was artificially induced to allow her to participate in the battle against the Shadows. Mitsuru is the only SEES member that had her ability to summon a Persona forced on her. Mitsuru loses all will to fight after Ikutsuki kills her father, since restoring the family honor is meaningless without a family.
Shipowners owe a duty of reasonable care to passengers. Consequently, passengers who are injured aboard ships may bring suit as if they had been injured ashore through the negligence of a third party. The passenger bears the burden of proving that the shipowner was negligent. While personal injury cases must generally be pursued within three years, suits against cruise lines may need to be brought within one year because of limitations contained in the passenger ticket.
In Nix, the Court established that the prosecution bears the burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that discovery of the evidence would have been inevitable. The defendant had argued for the higher clear and convincing evidence standard, but the Court explained that preponderance of the evidence is the normal burden of proof applied when it comes to admissibility of evidence, and there was no reason to depart from that for inevitable discovery.Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. at 444 & n.5.
World War III breaks out and in the middle of battle, the human's own alien synthezoids turn against their creators, nearly annihilating humankind. Later in the year 2085, the remaining humans are on the run from the machines who are terminating them. In order to survive to defeat the alien machines, the human race must leave Earth, and go to Mars. Among these voyagers is one woman who bears the burden of guilt for her father's contribution to the destruction of civilization.
Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors over their works (copyright), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons, restrictions on the use of untruths to harm others (slander and libel), and communications while a person is in prison. When a speech restriction is challenged in court, it is presumed invalid and the government bears the burden of convincing the court that the restriction is constitutional.
Throughout the story, Mitsuru hides many details about Tartarus and the Dark Hour from the group, due to feelings of guilt over her family's involvement in the accident that created them. Since her grandfather was responsible for everything, she believes that she alone bears the burden of setting the world right. Her Persona was artificially induced to allow her to participate in the battle against the Shadows. Mitsuru is the only SEES member that had her ability to summon a Persona forced on her.
In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct and gets the benefit of the doubt, while the other side bears the burden of proof. When a party bearing the burden of proof meets their burden, the burden of proof switches to the other side. Burdens may be of different kinds for each party, in different phases of litigation. The burden of production is a minimal burden to produce at least enough evidence for the trier of fact to consider a disputed claim.
Under normal long-term labour contracts, an employer bears the burden of proof as the defendant; if the plaintiff is the fired employee, the employer must justify the firing. This is known as the reversal of burden of proof, and is based on the legal justification provided to fire the employee. This 1973 law was enacted under Pierre Messmer's prime ministry during Valéry Giscard d'Estaing's presidency. Pierre Mesmer had succeeded Jacques Chaban-Delmas, who after May 1968 had a "new society project" aiming to modernize France.
For the example of this difference, assume a firm, that contains employer and employees. The tax imposed on the employer is divided. The concept of tax incidence was initially brought to economists' attention by the French Physiocrats, in particular François Quesnay, who argued that the incidence of all taxation falls ultimately on landowners and is at the expense of land rent. Tax incidence is said to "fall" upon the group that ultimately bears the burden of, or ultimately suffers a loss from, the tax.
On Earth, Haruto learns the Valvrave absorbs the pilot's memories and will soon kill him. Nevertheless, he decides to keep piloting so that no other bears the burden. L-elf tries rescuing Dorssian princess Lieselotte, who explains to Haruto that a race known as Magius landed on Earth a few centuries ago and began possessing Earth's lifeforms in order to survive. As time passed they created an organization called the Council of One Hundred and One to conceal their existence from humanity while securing Runes for their survival.
State court rules, however, may be stricter than this. Notably, under Rule 36(a)(3), requests for admission are automatically deemed admitted in U.S. federal courts if the opponent fails to timely respond or object. The opponent bears the burden of moving for relief from its failure to respond and providing a legitimate excuse for why it did not respond earlier. Some U.S. states have reversed the burden as set forth in the federal rules, such that the party propounding the RFAs must follow up with a motion to have RFAs deemed admitted.
Prize captors need show only "reasonable suspicion" that the property is subject to condemnation; the owner bears the burden of proving the contrary.Colombos, A Treatise on the Law of Prize p. 361-62 (observing claimant must show the property is not subject to confiscation, a reversal of the usual presumption of innocence) A prize court normally ordered the vessel and its cargo condemned and sold at auction. But the court's decision became vastly more complicated in the case of neutral vessels, or a neutral nation's cargo carried on an enemy vessel.
The Court in Near left open the possibility of prior restraints for various exceptional purposes, such as national security, control of obscenity, and the like. It wrote: Near's dicta suggest that, while a constitutional prior restraint can exist, the high burden of proof necessary to demonstrate constitutionality results in a presumption of invalidity, and the government bears the burden of showing the restraint's constitutionality. In a later case (Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart), the Court wrote: This shows the strong later acceptance of what had been a disputed decision when it was first handed down.
A bas-relief from Angkor Wat, Cambodia, shows Samudra manthan- Vishnu in the center and his turtle Avatar Kurma below The tortoise is a symbol of wisdom and knowledge, and is able to defend itself on its own. It personifies water, the moon, the Earth, time, immortality, and fertility. Creation is associated with the tortoise and it is also believed that the tortoise bears the burden of the whole world. The turtle has a prominent position as a symbol of steadfastness and tranquility in religion, mythology, and folklore from around the world.
Because an affirmative defense requires an assertion of facts beyond those claimed by the plaintiff, generally the party who offers an affirmative defense bears the burden of proof. The standard of proof is typically lower than beyond a reasonable doubt. It can either be proved by clear and convincing evidence or by a preponderance of the evidence. In this respect, affirmative defenses differ from ordinary defenses [claim of right, alibi, infancy, necessity, and self- defense (which is an affirmative defense at common law)], which the prosecution has the burden of disproving beyond a reasonable doubt.
It is thus seen that all eleven judges agreed that the reverse doctrine of equivalents is a valid defense, but six judges considered the summary judgment record insufficient to support a finding of reverse equivalents because of unresolved material facts, while five judges considered the record adequate support. The lead opinion stated that the burden of proof was allocated in this "ping–pong" manner: > The patentee bears the burden of proving infringement by a preponderance of > the evidence . . . . Initially that burden is carried when literal > infringement has been proved . . . .
A valid accord does not discharge the prior contract; instead it suspends the right to enforce it in accordance with the terms of the accord contract, in which satisfaction, or performance of the contract will discharge both contracts (the original and the accord). If the creditor breaches the accord, then the debtor will be able to bring up the existence of the accord in order to enjoin any action against him. If a person is sued over an alleged debt, that person bears the burden of proving the affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction.
Davis v. United States, 160 U.S. 469 (1895), is a criminal case establishing that in a federal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proof of sanity if an insanity defense is raised.Criminal Law - Cases and Materials, 7th ed. 2012, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, Guyora Binder, , It is a common law ruling that sets precedent in federal court, but is not a constitutional ruling interpreting the United States Constitution, so does not preclude states from requiring defendants to prove insanity, even to the point of requiring defendants to prove insanity beyond a reasonable doubt, as in Leland v.
As noted by the U.S. Supreme Court, summary judgement is mandated when, after sufficient time is allowed for discovery, there is a lack of evidence to support a non-moving party's case on issues for which that party bears the burden of proof. It is also the burden of the non-moving party to rebut any facts presented affidavit or other evidence that would indicate the presence of a genuine and material issue of fact for trial, rather than to simply allege the existence of a broad factual dispute. For these reasons, the count did grant Burger King's motion for summary judgement with respect to Count I.
These laws often function by allowing a defendant to file a motion to strike and/or dismiss on the grounds that the case involves protected speech on a matter of public concern. The plaintiff then bears the burden of showing a probability that they will prevail. If the plaintiffs fail to meet their burden their claim is dismissed and the plaintiffs may be required to pay a penalty for bringing the case. Anti-SLAPP laws occasionally come under criticism from those who believe that there should not be barriers to the right to petition for those who sincerely believe they have been wronged, regardless of ulterior motives.
It is a higher standard of proof than the balance of probabilities (commonly used in civil matters) and is usually therefore reserved for criminal matters where what is at stake (e.g. someone's liberty) is considered more serious and therefore deserving of a higher threshold. The prosecution in criminal matters typically bears the burden of proof and is required to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that in order for a defendant to be found guilty the case presented by the prosecution must be enough to remove any reasonable doubt in the mind of the jury that the defendant is guilty of the crime with which they are charged.
However, definitions of the defence are derived from M'Naghten's case and have not been codified. Whether a particular condition amounts to a disease of the mind is not a medical but a legal question to be decided in accordance with the ordinary rules of interpretation.. This defence is an exception to the Woolmington v DPP (1935) 'golden thread',. as the party raising the issue of the defence of mental illness bears the burden of proving this defence on the balance of probabilities.. Generally, the defence will raise the issue of insanity. However, the prosecution can raise it in exceptional circumstances: R v Ayoub (1984).
Zeelandic bears the burden of being strongly associated with the rural population, as it is spoken mainly in the countryside. The town dialects of Middelburg and Vlissingen are both much closer to Hollandic than the rural variants and are almost extinct. Surveys held in the 1990s found that at least 60% of Zeeland's population still use Zeelandic as their everyday language. An estimated 250,000 people speak Zeelandic as a mother tongue (West Zeelandic Flemish is included in that count), and although it is in decline, just as other regional languages, it is in no direct danger of extinction since in some villages with strong isolated communities, more than 90% of the youngsters still speak Zeelandic.
Australia prohibits circumvention of "access control technical protection measures" in Section 116 of the Copyright Act. The law currently imposes penalties for circumvention of such measures as well as the manufacturing and distribution of tools to enable it. DRM may be legally circumvented under a few distinct circumstances which are named as exceptions in the law: #permission of the rightsholder #enabling interoperability with copyrighted software #encryption research #security testing #disabling access to private information (circumvention only) #national security or law enforcement #library acquisition decisions (circumvention only) #acts prescribed by regulation (circumvention only) A person circumventing the access control bears the burden of proof that one of these exceptions apply. Penalties for violation of the anti-circumvention laws include an injunction, monetary damages, and destruction of enabling devices.
Individual stations may apply for up to 10% (−10 dBc) if they can prove it will not cause harmful interference to any other station. If at least six verified complaints of ongoing RF interference to another station come from locations within the other station's service contour, the interfering station will be required to reduce to the next level down of 4%, 2% (−17 dB), or 1%, until the FCC makes a final determination. The station to which the interference is caused bears the burden of proof and its associated expenses, rather than the station that causes the problem. For grandfathered FM stations which are allowed to remain over the limit for their class, these numbers are relative to that lower limit rather than their actual power.
The District Court recognized that Mirowski was the defendant in the action, but it held that Mirowski, "[a]s the part[y] asserting infringement," bore the burden of proving infringement. After a bench trial, the court found that Mirowski had not proved infringement, either directly or under the doctrine of equivalents, and it therefore lost. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that "when an infringement counterclaim by a patentee is foreclosed by the continued existence of a license, a licensee seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and of no consequent liability under the license bears the burden of persuasion." Therefore, Medtronic, as plaintiff, bore the burden of proof, and the District Court ruling was vacated and remanded.
The position of Receiver has high status and responsibility, and Jonas quickly finds himself growing distant from his classmates, including his close friends Asher and Fiona. The rules Jonas receives further separate him, as they allow him no time to play with his friends, and require him to keep his training secret. They also allow him to lie and withhold his feelings from his family, things generally not allowed in the regimented Community. Once he begins it, Jonas's training makes clear his uniqueness, for the Receiver of Memory is just that—a person who bears the burden of the memories from all of history, and who is the only one allowed access to books beyond schoolbooks and the rulebook issued to every household.
Burden of proof is a legal duty that encompasses two connected but separate ideas that for establishing the truth of facts in a trial before tribunals in the United States: the "burden of production" and the "burden of persuasion." In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct, while the other side bears the burden of producing evidence persuasive enough to establish the truth of facts needed to satisfy all the required legal elements of legal dispute. There are varying types of burden of persuasion commonly referred to as standards of proof, and depending on the type of case, the standard of proof will be higher or lower. Burdens of persuasion and production may be of different standards for each party, in different phases of litigation.
In 2016, Thuraisingam defended Roy Ngerng, a blogger who was sued for defamation by Lee Hsien Loong, who is the Prime Minister of Singapore. He also acted for activist and social worker Jolovan Wham and Donald Liew when they were sent letters of demand in relation to comments made by them which were allegedly defamatory of Singapore's Minister of Manpower, Mrs Josephine Teo. In 2016 and 2017, he represented The Online Citizen, an independent online media platform, in successfully protecting its right to free speech against the Singaporean government. He is now representing The Online Citizen and the Singapore Democratic Party in the Singapore Court of Appeal on the issue of whether or not the Singapore government bears the burden of proof in proving that a statement is false when it issues a correction direction under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA).
See . An age limit may be legally specified in the circumstance where age has been shown to be a "bona fide occupational qualification [BFOQ] reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the particular business" (see ). In practice, BFOQs for age are limited to the obvious (hiring a young actor to play a young character in a movie) or when public safety is at stake (for example, in the case of age limits for pilots and bus drivers). The ADEA does not stop an employer from favoring an older employee over a younger one, even when the younger one is over 40 years old.. The United States Supreme Court, in Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab, 554 U.S. 84 (2008), held that the employer, not the employee, bears the burden of proving that a layoff or other action that hurts older workers more than others was based not on age but on some other “reasonable factor.” In Gomez- Perez v.
In response to Therasense, the USPTO rewrote its definition of materiality to say that information is material if :(1) It establishes, by itself or in combination with other information, a prima facie case of unpatentability of a claim; or :(2) It refutes, or is inconsistent with, a position the applicant takes in: ::(i) Opposing an argument of unpatentability relied on by the Office, or ::(ii) Asserting an argument of patentability. The misrepresentation or omission can include: :(a) failure to submit material prior art known by the applicant; :(b) failure to explain references in a foreign language or submit pre-existing full or partial translations of the references; :(c) misstatements of fact, including misstatements in affidavits concerning patentability; and :(d) mis-description of inventorship (authorship). The party asking the court to decline to enforce the patent, usually the alleged infringer, bears the burden of proving inequitable conduct to the court. The moving party must show by clear and convincing evidence that the patentee intentionally withheld or misrepresented information, and that the information was material.
Radical feminists assert that society is a patriarchy in which the class of men are the oppressors of the class of women. They propose that the oppression of women is the most fundamental form of oppression, one that has existed since the inception of humanity. As radical feminist Ti-Grace Atkinson wrote in her foundational piece "Radical Feminism" (1969): > The first dichotomous division of this mass [mankind] is said to have been > on the grounds of sex: male and female ... it was because half the human > race bears the burden of the reproductive process and because man, the > ‘rational’ animal, had the wit to take advantage of that, that the > childbearers, or the 'beasts of burden,' were corralled into a political > class: equivocating the biologically contingent burden into a political (or > necessary) penalty, thereby modifying these individuals’ definition from the > human to the functional, or animal. Radical feminists argue that, because of patriarchy, women have come to be viewed as the "other" to the male norm, and as such have been systematically oppressed and marginalized.

No results under this filter, show 97 sentences.

Copyright © 2024 RandomSentenceGen.com All rights reserved.